I HAVE A THEORY

The THEORY of Relativity, The THEORY of Evolution, The Big Bang THEORY, Cell THEORY, Chaos THEORY, Molecular THEORY and Conspiracy THEORY.

All of the above terms, with the exception of Conspiracy THEORY, have, at one time or another, been accepted as FACTS by the majority of the worlds population.

According to WIKIPEDIA, a THEORY is a contemplative and rational type of abstract or generalised THINKING, or the results of such THINKING.

Depending on the context, the results of such THINKING, include generalised (accepted) explanations of how nature works, or how the planet came into being for example.

A THEORY, in simple terms, is used to provide an explanation for an observation, which attempts to give a possible HYPOTHESIS to support the given explanation.

A THEORY can also be called upon to CHALLENGE the original THEORY, which is usually an official or generally accepted explanation for any given event, which of course is where the term Conspiracy THEORIST is sometimes used.

A Conspiracy THEORIST, is also a derogatory term used by the established order, which normally includes the mainstream media, to marginalise, isolate, ridicule and target anybody who offers an alternative THEORY which challenges the ‘Accepted’ explanation.

‘According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first use of the phrase “conspiracy theory” occurred in a 1909 article in The American Historical Review. Other sources predate this use by nearly four decades to at least 1871, where it is used in The Journal of Mental Science reporting on a conference of the Fifth Quarterly Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association (now the Royal College of Psychiatrists), held on January 27, 1870:’

 “The theory of Dr. Sankey as to the manner in which these injuries to the chest occurred in asylums deserved our careful attention. It was at least more plausible than the conspiracy theory of Mr. Charles Beade…” – WIKIPEDIA

Most science is based on THEORY, all religion is based on THEORY, even the explanation of how human beings came to exist on this planet is based on a THEORY which has been almost universally accepted as FACT.

Theologists have argued (THEORISED) as to the true meaning of the Bible, in much the same way as Scientists have disagreed over any number of THEORIES, in order to PROVE that their personal THEORY is the only one possible, ie: The universally acceptable answer.

Answers, or accepted ‘FACTS’ which until fairly recently, have remained almost unchallenged by the world’s population for many hundreds of years.

The thing to remember is, just because something is universally believed by many people to be a FACT, does not mean it is a TRUE reflection of the actual events that occurred.

It will serve no purpose to list all the events which has shown this to be the case, but using the GULF OF TONKIN INCIDENT as only one example, it clearly shows how organised False Flag events have been used throughout history to steer the opinions of any population, to support a political agenda.

You may have noticed I am using WIKIPEDIA references throughout this article.

That is deliberate as WIKIPEDIA appears to be the main source of information used by the majority of people who do their research online.

Which ironically, is just another example of how an entirely controlled source of readily available, searchable information is still seen to be the first port of call for most people.

So if it’s on WIKIPEDIA, many people will accept it as FACT and look no further.

Most people are steered towards the ‘Acceptable’ version of any given event, almost as soon as they begin an online search, as they will find WIKIPEDIA entries feature prominently if search engines such as Google, Dogpile, Yahoo, AOL and MSN are used as a source.

Is it starting to register yet?

You may have also noticed that I use the term ‘Established Order‘ to describe the entities that exist throughout the world, which remotely control every word the Media print, which in turn controls the thinking of the majority of the population.

From experience, I know that when writers refer to the ever-present yet shadowy figures that exist behind the scenes of the public image of Government for example, many less enlightened and supposedly intelligent people, will refer to it as ‘Classic New World Order Nonsense’ or ‘That rubbish about the Illuminati’ and dismiss it without another thought.

‘Conspiracy Theorist’, has like other related words, such as ‘Racist’, ‘Bigot’, ‘Sexist’, ‘Anti-Semetic’, ‘Homophobic’, ‘Islamophobe’, ‘Transphobic’ and so on, have been used as a cover-all solution simply to prevent awkward questions being asked.

For instance, if a Pro-Gay article is published, you will find that it’s entirely pointless to question or disagree with the content, as you will instantly be labelled as being ‘Anti-Gay‘ a ‘Hater’ or a ‘Troll’ or something similar, a call which is of course taken up by any number of similarly brainwashed people who are terrified lest the same label becomes attached to them.

Regardless of whether the article is a complete load of shit or not, it becomes almost immune from any form of criticism, in the same way that ‘Pro-Jewish’ or ‘Pro-Islam’ articles become untouchable regardless of the veracity of the content matter.

An example that springs to mind immediately was an interview conducted by the always delightful Kay Burley of Sky News, following the UK Riots of 2011.

She asked the owner of a shop that was ransacked during the previous evenings disturbances, if he could in fact, identify any of those involved.

He replied in the affirmative, adding that they were ”local black kids”, which caused the MSM Mouthpiece Burley to cut him off mid-sentence reminding him that “he could not say that”.

The man replied, “yes I can because I know them, they live around here, they shop at my premises”….

You then saw the camera cutting away towards the broken shop fronts.

That is the establishment and mainstream Media’s agenda in plain view, a view that one simply cannot comment or speak the truth, just in case someone is offended or outraged by it.

Which of course they will be, as the programming is deeply ingrained.

That is only one example.

If you care to explore further, you will find many, many similar examples in the mainstream media, all ‘approved’ reading materials in educational establishments, local and national government literature and the list goes on.

Why are people so offended by the truth?

Because they have been told to be offended, they are encouraged on a daily basis by the programmes they watch on the television, by the reminders in movies and the mainstream media, in all it’s formats.

Since the Internet has become a part of daily life, the latest ‘Buzzword’ that is being utilised to great effect, is the word ‘Troll’.

Once again, the correct definition of an Internet Troll has been discarded to retro-fit almost anything that does not conform to the established thought patterns of much of the population, who’s belief systems have been nurtured by the mainstream media.

“In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. This sense of the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, but have been used more widely. Media attention in recent years has equated trolling with online harassment. For example, mass media has used troll to describe “a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families.” WIKIPEDIA

You will notice that the WIKIPEDIA entry has now allegedly been edited to include material published on Websites and Blogs with ‘the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response’, which as I remember it, did not refer to material published on ones own website.

The real definition of an Internet Troll is a person that posts inflammatory, hateful and cruel comments on forums, Blogs, Chatrooms and Social Media, with the sole intention of causing fear and distress to the person or group being ‘Trolled’.

Does that sound like somebody who writes on his own blog and does not force anyone to read it ?

Even the edited Wikipedia entry acknowledges that mass media was responsible for changing the definition to further it’s own agenda.

And of course, it is difficult to miss the daily occurrences of mainstream bloggers and Social Media users who constantly refer to anybody who asks perfectly valid questions as being ‘Trolls.

The Internet may seem at times to resemble the Wild West, but it is still the only viable source of uncensored information freely available to everyone.

It would be wise to remember that every time you shriek, ‘Troll’ and are dutifully offended by something that offers an alternative view, it is still your choice entirely whether or not to read that view.

The Internet is the only freely available platform that is able to offer you that alternative, or any alternative view for that matter.

The establishment and the mainstream media will never give you that option, you can remain assured of that.

16 thoughts on “I HAVE A THEORY

  1. THE COMMENTS ON THIS SUGGEST THAT AT LEAST SOME YANKS ARE WAKING UP:-

    “Just weeks before Blackwater guards fatally shot 17 civilians at Baghdad’s Nisour Square in 2007, the State Department began investigating the security contractor’s operations in Iraq. But the inquiry was abandoned after Blackwater’s top manager there issued a threat: “that he could kill” the government’s chief investigator and “no one could or would do anything about it as we were in Iraq,” according to department reports.”

    READERSUPPORTEDNEWS

    COVER-UP OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT KIDS BRINGING DISEASE INTO THE U.S.

    NONE OF THIS IS BEING REPORTED ON THEIR MSM.(ALSO, REMEMBER THAT T.B. HAD ALMOST BEEN ERADICATED IN BRITAIN, UNTIL BLAIR’S UNCONTROLLED “LET ANYONE IN” POLICY):-

    WHITEHOUSE WHISPERS

    It’s Worse Than You Know;

    “In a May, 2014 letter to the U.S. Senate, Doctor Jay S. Cohen said of fluoroquinolones, “In my 40+ years in pharmacovigilance, FQs (fluoroquinolones) surpass Vioxx and Thalidomide in the degree of permanent harm done.” Let that sink in for a bit.”

    WAKINGTIMES

    AND:-

    WAKINGTIMES

    Bush & Blair: Blackmailed pedophiles or just war criminals?

    VT.COM

    NO APOLOGY FOR HARPING ON ON THIS BECAUSE THIS IS IMPORTANT.
    I HOPE YOU ALL GOOGLED THE “YINON PLAN”, SO THAT YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND WHERE OUR NEXT WORLD WAR IS COMING FROM:-

    Why Israel is in love with Kurdistan:-

    OPERATION EDGE

  2. “The last six days have been horrible for the web, and the Jewish press is reporting NADA. This proves it is the Jews doing it, if it really was terrorists or CHINA or anyone else, they would shout it from the rooftops.”

    BEFORE ITS NEWS

    PLENTY OF THEORIES ABOUT THE BEE DIE-OFF.

    SURVIVALBACKPACK

    BEAUTIFULLY SARCASTIC:-

    “Since education attainment levels have dropped like a rock to the point US businesses have to write job descriptions and employee instruction manuals at 6th to 8th grade (12-14 year old) levels, pictures might help get some Americans to understand USA history. Americans cannot profess to be photo op experts on the rest of the world (and cannot find many nations on a map) when they have not one damned clue about the history of their own nation.”

    RENSE.COM

  3. JUST A QUICKY. IF YOU’RE HAVING A PROBLEM ACCESSING SPIVEY’S SITE,I GOT TO IT BY USING THE “IXQUICK METASEARCH” SEARCH ENGINE. IT’S DUTCH BASED & HAS WORKED FOR ME WHEN OTHERS (GOOGLE) TRY NOT TO.

  4. What if conspiracy theorists were not conspiracy theorists but anti-conspiracy theorists who were conspiring to discredit conspiracy theorists…?

    1. What if Leena who wasn’t really Leena actually had something interesting & intelligent to say for once?

      Would we all die of shock?

      Guess we’ll never find out because it’s unlikely to ever happen 😉

  5. The world is a better place for people like you Jimmy Jones. I always look forward to reading your beautifully written articles, they are a joy to read. You have perfectly articulated the issues within this article (you always do). The country is a richer place for having The Outlaw and it’s like and I sincerely thank you Mr Jones!

    Emm Jay x

  6. I had to laugh at the Jean Kelly quote in your article – note to fabricator of that post, you must do better at matching the picture with the words.

    Never have I seen such a paradox on social media hahaha. I also have to laugh at that certain ‘red top rag et al’, they need to start a war against any alternative view because it shows their fairy tales up for exactly that, nothing but emotion inducing garbage.

    Whilst I’m on the subject of ‘the Spun’, there’s no point in getting worked up about them or others of the same because let’s consider who actually buys that *cough* newspaper ( that was soooo hard to type).

    So do we think Doctors buy it?

    What about Barristers?

    Teachers?

    Social Workers? any other professional person you care to think of?

    My guess would be that they don’t, nor would anyone from middle class Britain.

    So what about intelligent people?

    Well none of these categories would buy the Spun because they simply don’t want to be put in the same demographics as the Spun reader, you don’t want to have that sort of image, in fact any sane person wouldn’t want the association with something which tells the world what kind of person you are by the fiction you read, would they?

    I read another article posted by Chris on his site and it wasn’t so much the words he wrote which really grabbed my attention but the blatant attempt at subliminal messages contained within the screenshots and photographs.

    For instance that woman wearing the black furry jacket – not unlike a bearskin, then in the shot with the reporter the same woman’s top has furry bits on the shoulder and lots of dotty, buttony things – not unlike Rigsbys uniform.

    It’s all setting the scene to reinforce a message only we know better don’t we 🙂

    Maybe THE SHUN would be a better name for it.

  7. Becoming a conspiracy theorist is much like taking up golf or stamp collecting, it becomes a way of life and something obsessive. Being Elvis Presley impersonators is a much more healthy pastime (than being a conspiracy theorist), it wont mess with your brains(?).

Comments are closed.