The THEORY of Relativity, The THEORY of Evolution, The Big Bang THEORY, Cell THEORY, Chaos THEORY, Molecular THEORY and Conspiracy THEORY.
All of the above terms, with the exception of Conspiracy THEORY, have, at one time or another, been accepted as FACTS by the majority of the worlds population.
According to WIKIPEDIA, a THEORY is a contemplative and rational type of abstract or generalised THINKING, or the results of such THINKING.
Depending on the context, the results of such THINKING, include generalised (accepted) explanations of how nature works, or how the planet came into being for example.
A THEORY, in simple terms, is used to provide an explanation for an observation, which attempts to give a possible HYPOTHESIS to support the given explanation.
A THEORY can also be called upon to CHALLENGE the original THEORY, which is usually an official or generally accepted explanation for any given event, which of course is where the term Conspiracy THEORIST is sometimes used.
A Conspiracy THEORIST, is also a derogatory term used by the established order, which normally includes the mainstream media, to marginalise, isolate, ridicule and target anybody who offers an alternative THEORY which challenges the ‘Accepted’ explanation.
‘According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first use of the phrase “conspiracy theory” occurred in a 1909 article in The American Historical Review. Other sources predate this use by nearly four decades to at least 1871, where it is used in The Journal of Mental Science reporting on a conference of the Fifth Quarterly Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association (now the Royal College of Psychiatrists), held on January 27, 1870:’
“The theory of Dr. Sankey as to the manner in which these injuries to the chest occurred in asylums deserved our careful attention. It was at least more plausible than the conspiracy theory of Mr. Charles Beade…” – WIKIPEDIA
Most science is based on THEORY, all religion is based on THEORY, even the explanation of how human beings came to exist on this planet is based on a THEORY which has been almost universally accepted as FACT.
Theologists have argued (THEORISED) as to the true meaning of the Bible, in much the same way as Scientists have disagreed over any number of THEORIES, in order to PROVE that their personal THEORY is the only one possible, ie: The universally acceptable answer.
Answers, or accepted ‘FACTS’ which until fairly recently, have remained almost unchallenged by the world’s population for many hundreds of years.
The thing to remember is, just because something is universally believed by many people to be a FACT, does not mean it is a TRUE reflection of the actual events that occurred.
It will serve no purpose to list all the events which has shown this to be the case, but using the GULF OF TONKIN INCIDENT as only one example, it clearly shows how organised False Flag events have been used throughout history to steer the opinions of any population, to support a political agenda.
You may have noticed I am using WIKIPEDIA references throughout this article.
That is deliberate as WIKIPEDIA appears to be the main source of information used by the majority of people who do their research online.
Which ironically, is just another example of how an entirely controlled source of readily available, searchable information is still seen to be the first port of call for most people.
So if it’s on WIKIPEDIA, many people will accept it as FACT and look no further.
Most people are steered towards the ‘Acceptable’ version of any given event, almost as soon as they begin an online search, as they will find WIKIPEDIA entries feature prominently if search engines such as Google, Dogpile, Yahoo, AOL and MSN are used as a source.
Is it starting to register yet?
You may have also noticed that I use the term ‘Established Order‘ to describe the entities that exist throughout the world, which remotely control every word the Media print, which in turn controls the thinking of the majority of the population.
From experience, I know that when writers refer to the ever-present yet shadowy figures that exist behind the scenes of the public image of Government for example, many less enlightened and supposedly intelligent people, will refer to it as ‘Classic New World Order Nonsense’ or ‘That rubbish about the Illuminati’ and dismiss it without another thought.
‘Conspiracy Theorist’, has like other related words, such as ‘Racist’, ‘Bigot’, ‘Sexist’, ‘Anti-Semetic’, ‘Homophobic’, ‘Islamophobe’, ‘Transphobic’ and so on, have been used as a cover-all solution simply to prevent awkward questions being asked.
For instance, if a Pro-Gay article is published, you will find that it’s entirely pointless to question or disagree with the content, as you will instantly be labelled as being ‘Anti-Gay‘ a ‘Hater’ or a ‘Troll’ or something similar, a call which is of course taken up by any number of similarly brainwashed people who are terrified lest the same label becomes attached to them.
Regardless of whether the article is a complete load of shit or not, it becomes almost immune from any form of criticism, in the same way that ‘Pro-Jewish’ or ‘Pro-Islam’ articles become untouchable regardless of the veracity of the content matter.
An example that springs to mind immediately was an interview conducted by the always delightful Kay Burley of Sky News, following the UK Riots of 2011.
She asked the owner of a shop that was ransacked during the previous evenings disturbances, if he could in fact, identify any of those involved.
He replied in the affirmative, adding that they were ”local black kids”, which caused the MSM Mouthpiece Burley to cut him off mid-sentence reminding him that “he could not say that”.
The man replied, “yes I can because I know them, they live around here, they shop at my premises”….
You then saw the camera cutting away towards the broken shop fronts.
That is the establishment and mainstream Media’s agenda in plain view, a view that one simply cannot comment or speak the truth, just in case someone is offended or outraged by it.
Which of course they will be, as the programming is deeply ingrained.
That is only one example.
If you care to explore further, you will find many, many similar examples in the mainstream media, all ‘approved’ reading materials in educational establishments, local and national government literature and the list goes on.
Why are people so offended by the truth?
Because they have been told to be offended, they are encouraged on a daily basis by the programmes they watch on the television, by the reminders in movies and the mainstream media, in all it’s formats.
Since the Internet has become a part of daily life, the latest ‘Buzzword’ that is being utilised to great effect, is the word ‘Troll’.
Once again, the correct definition of an Internet Troll has been discarded to retro-fit almost anything that does not conform to the established thought patterns of much of the population, who’s belief systems have been nurtured by the mainstream media.
“In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. This sense of the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, but have been used more widely. Media attention in recent years has equated trolling with online harassment. For example, mass media has used troll to describe “a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families.” – WIKIPEDIA
You will notice that the WIKIPEDIA entry has now allegedly been edited to include material published on Websites and Blogs with ‘the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response’, which as I remember it, did not refer to material published on ones own website.
The real definition of an Internet Troll is a person that posts inflammatory, hateful and cruel comments on forums, Blogs, Chatrooms and Social Media, with the sole intention of causing fear and distress to the person or group being ‘Trolled’.
Does that sound like somebody who writes on his own blog and does not force anyone to read it ?
Even the edited Wikipedia entry acknowledges that mass media was responsible for changing the definition to further it’s own agenda.
And of course, it is difficult to miss the daily occurrences of mainstream bloggers and Social Media users who constantly refer to anybody who asks perfectly valid questions as being ‘Trolls.
The Internet may seem at times to resemble the Wild West, but it is still the only viable source of uncensored information freely available to everyone.
It would be wise to remember that every time you shriek, ‘Troll’ and are dutifully offended by something that offers an alternative view, it is still your choice entirely whether or not to read that view.
The Internet is the only freely available platform that is able to offer you that alternative, or any alternative view for that matter.
The establishment and the mainstream media will never give you that option, you can remain assured of that.