It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the extent to which, we, as a sovereign nation here in the UK, are being blatantly lied to, and distracted from what is really happening in the world, by the mainstream media.
For those out there with little or no access to the Internet, it would prove almost impossible to get information other than what is churned out by the established news outlets, which in turn are almost entirely funded and controlled by groups who’s only allegiances are to global corporations and financial institutions.
“There is no such thing, at this date of the world history, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell out his own country for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting of an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of the rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our very lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” – John Swinton, the former Chief of Staff at the New York Times in 1922.
Things are no different today, and the stark reality is that the greater majority of people are not even aware of it. Today, in the United States, a select group of super-rich families and tightly-knit financial interests own the media outright and in turn control the U.S. government via their ownership and absolute control of that media.
In the UK, and throughout the rest of the world, there is no reason to think it’s not a similar situation.
Apart from the obvious ‘mis-reporting’ of the truth, the mass media have another purpose, which is to ‘mis-direct’ and steer you away from what you are not allowed to see and hear about, by dissemination of carefully selected snippets of information which are designed to seep into the collective psyche without actually providing any real answers.
A tried and tested process, which provides just enough information to it’s targeted audience, and which does not allow a direct response or clarification that a conversation or an open discussion would have.
In other words, dissemination of news to a large number of people, can present itself as having multiple meanings to each individual depending on their experience, their attitudes, their prior knowledge, their ethnicity, their religious beliefs or even their gender.
One size, certainly does not fit all in this case, and once the basic information is planted in this manner, the harvesting of what emerges from that, may be as far removed from the reality as it is possible to be.
Many of us are witnessing this right now, with the duplicitous manner in which the mass media have presented their coverage of alleged historic childhood sexual abuse, especially if those allegations have been linked with prominent establishment figures for instance.
But where the mainstream media really excel, is in their mis-reporting of ‘foreign‘ or ‘non-domestic‘ news.
The current situation unfolding in Syria is a good example of how the mainstream media spins a skewed version of what may be really happening, inasmuch as their negative coverage of Putin and Russia’s role in ‘assisting’ the Assad regime.
Is Putin genuinely aligning the military might of Russia with an ‘enemy of the west’?
Or is he acutely aware of the possible effects that Syria falling will have on not only the whole of the Middle East region, but mother Russia herself and consequently the rest of the world?
Imagine the following if you will:
If Saudi Arabia, (as is now widely believed) are funding the Tory Party in the UK, the government of the United States as well as the French Government, and are also financially backing rebel Jihadist terror groups around the world, including in the UK and of course the same Wahhibi crackpots who are trying to destroy Syria – things begin to make a lot more sense.
Syria is being attacked because they are a free, independent and sovereign state, which does not fit into the template being drawn up for the region by the international banking system and the giant power corporations who, no doubt have an interest in the enormous gas fields that lie beneath Syria.
Assad, who heads a nationalist government, would use the revenue from the sales of that gas for the people of Syria, and that is not going to be tolerated by the western powers.
Syria as a country, is not particularly important to the globalists, (apart from its gas fields) it is being destroyed so Israel can continue to wipe the Palestinians off the face of the earth, plus following the destruction of Syria, they can also attack Iran through Iraq.
From there they may go on to attack Belarus, and when both Iran and Belarus have fallen – they are at the Russian border.
The international bankers hate Russia, because under Putin they have broken away from the internationalists who previously had a stranglehold on the country.
Putin has re-established Russia as a Nationalist, Christian, and sovereign state and as such is the main target for the internationalists.
There may well come a time, and not too far away, that the only way the UK, or any other European nation will be allowed to regain their freedom and independence from the clutches of the internationalist bankers, will be with the backing of Russia.
And for Europe to survive, it needs Russia.
But that is something you will never see in the mainstream media, and it’ll not feature prominently in the so-called ‘Alternative Media’ for that matter.
It may be worth thinking about, why that would be?