5G, OR NOT 5G ?

That is the question. Whether it is nobler in the mind, to suffer the slings and arrows, and the smears, and the constant attacks from the establishment gatekeepers, and the bad actors who promote 5G, if we dare to take a stand, suitably armed against the sea of troubles and misfortune it may bring, and by opposing it, end it.

Or do we simply accept 5G technology, as being the completely harmless entity we are being told it is, and is something that will undoubtably enrich our lives, and connect us to the rest of humanity, at previously unimaginable speeds?

Blind public acceptance and compliance, and on a worldwide scale, certainly appears to a ‘thing’ lately, and has been brought into sharp focus, especially this year, which for anyone who has eyes in their head, and are able to focus on more pressing issues than the opening times of their nearest McDonalds, needs no further explanation.

On a personal level, I am opposed to the worldwide rollout of 5G technology for a number of reasons, none of which, have, in any way been influenced by any of the ‘anti’ 5G cranks, or the ‘pro’ 5G mobs who have rallied behind their online battle lines, and have been taking potshots at each other, and using smear tactics at every opportunity, ever since.

My reluctance to embrace 5G, as readily as many others appear to want to, relates solely to it’s draconian surveillance capabilities, as I believe that we have far too much monitoring and state control over our lives already, without ramping it up the point where we reach full-on Orwellian levels.

Neither do I feel comfortable, with the amount of 5G infrastructure that has been put in place during the Covid – 19 ‘crisis’, and as such, it has been difficult to monitor what has been going on, or to ask questions, and even denied, due to lockdown restrictions, the basic human right to legitimately protest against it.

In addition, and as far as I’m aware, there has been no long-term testing of 5G undertaken, from which to monitor, or assess any possible immediate, or future health risks, and the fact that the whole 5G infrastructure is totally reliant on the involvement of a hardline Communist regime, for it to even be able to function, is simply too great a risk to this country’s national security.

In my opinion.

6 thoughts on “5G, OR NOT 5G ?

  1. My apologies to William Shakespeare, or Francis Bacon, or to whoever was actually responsible for coming up with the words I have used as inspiration for the title of this piece.

    1. Maybe it was actually Christopher Marlowe.
      Either way, 5G is not for the betterment of mankind.
      Neither is the vast amount of satellites Elon Musk is encasing the world with.

  2. When I saw this being shared on Facebook, I must admit that I thought it was going to be another one of those crazy ass 5G blogs which claims that it spreads Coronavirus or is beamed into peoples bedrooms from the sidewalk to fry their brains and give them cancer and other crap like that. I’m glad its not. I totally get where you are coming from with this, and the questions you have asked are justified, and sensible, and not the usual fear promoting crap. We have enough to contend with this year already with the pandemic and the economic situation and useless politicians running about like headless chickens and changing their minds every ten minutes. So thank you for this, it has given me a lot to think about. I have bookmarked this site and will sit down later and have a good read of some of the other stuff on here, Thank you again for this. Mags x

Comments are closed.