Tag Archives: WWII


“On the 24th January 1965, Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill died.

As the British Mainstream Media and establishment-funded ie: ‘Tame’ historians, still appear to be reluctant to publish and promote anything other than a pre-scripted, sanitised, and altogether inaccurate depiction – on this, the 50th Anniversary of the death of Winston Churchill, the Outlaw seeks to redress the balance by re-publishing the following article, which originally appeared here on July 13th 2013″.


Our current crop of Westminster politicians have now decided that their tame educators must now place more emphasis on teaching children ‘real’ history in a more practical manner in schools.

An indication that finally, British schools are going to be shaken out of their sleeplike, propaganda-laden and heavily-censored teaching methods perhaps?

Sadly it appears not, as one of the suggested subjects is the life and achievements of Winston Churchill, who topped the table in a BBC programme ‘The 100 Greatest Britons’ which was first aired in 2002.

The programme nominated who they considered to be ‘Great Britons’ and encouraged the viewer to vote accordingly.

It should come as no surprise that Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, DL, FRS Hon RA (1874-1965) topped that list, as (especially in the media and politics) Winston Churchill has long been celebrated as the definitive ‘Greatest Briton’.

So what is it that made this aristocratic war correspondent, author and military officer, who became First Lord of the Admiralty and wartime Prime Minister following the resignation of Neville Chamberlain in 1940, such a paragon of ‘Britishness?’

And why is he so heavily promoted by mainstream historians and the establishment? (Who incidentally have been entwined since written history has been set down for posterity.)

Was it because he behaved very aggressively towards striking workers in the General Strike of 1926, using the same methods he had used in south Wales between 1910 and 1911?

Was it because he will be forever remembered as a hammer of the workers who sent troops and tanks against the unarmed striking Mineworkers in South Wales?

Or could it be that he had rejected Adolf Hitler’s proposal to spare civilian targets, preferring instead to provoke the German leader into bombing London by ordering the Royal Air Force to attack Berlin and various civilian targets first?

It is worth remembering that Hitler in fact, had made very generous offers of peace that many people in England were more than willing to accept, which if successful, would have meant the often-referred to ‘Holocaust’ may not have occurred.

“During the first two years of the war, when the German authorities made efforts to secure the exodus of the Jews from the Reich and from Nazi occupied territory, it was Churchill & the British Government which took the lead in barring the escape routes from Europe against Jewish refugees.”Bernard Wasserstein.

So was it his blocking of the Red Cross from accurately monitoring and recording civilian casualties, which before the end of September 1940, numbered among the dead more than 7000 in London alone, including 700 children that made him a Great Briton?

Or maybe it was the deliberate misreporting of the true number of fatalities, which, by the end of the war some 60,000 British and 650,000 German Civilians had perished due to both German & Allied ‘strategic’ bombing attacks?

Churchill himself described the Second World War as the “most unnecessary war in history,” which was an uncannily accurate statement considering his true loyalties were to bankers in the City of London who had covered his stock market gambling losses and also saved his beloved home at Chartwell from foreclosure.

But that could not have been the reason that Churchill played such a major part in involving Britain in the second largest conflict in human history could it?

There are nowadays, greater numbers of historians who believe that the Second World War was instigated to be another step towards a program, which in the long-term means to enslave humanity in a world dictatorship run solely by these London-based monopoly capitalists.

These Megalomaniacs start and perpetuate wars simply to increase their wealth and power and to manipulate, reshape and further brutalise the societies they already control financially, under the guise of carefully managed ‘Patriotism’.

The ongoing “War on Terror” for example, was always intended to make us forfeit our civil rights and steer us towards yet another unnecessary war, but this time against Islam.

One of the lesser-known facts about Winston Churchill is that his maternal grandfather was Leonard Jerome (formerly Jacobson, 1818-1891) a speculator and business partner of August Belmont (nee Schoenberg 1813-1890), who was the Rothschild family’s main American representative.

Even his often written about ‘drive’ has been attributed to the fact his parents neglected him and taught him that love has to be earned in terms of how the world saw him.

But was it simply because he wanted to avenge his father whose political career/life was cut short by syphilis?

He was also one of the coldest and narcissistic personalities that his contemporaries had ever encountered.

His rise to power was assisted by his mother’s connections with the Rothschild’s, including the powerful banker Ernest Cassell and not by the peerless leadership qualities his biographers wax lyrically about.

In the 1930’s, he became a lobbyist, promoting “The Focus Group,” which was led by the Zionist chairman of British Shell, Sir Robert Waley-Cohen.

Churchill later became the main barrier of “appeasement” and eventually the biggest opponent to making peace with Hitler.

It would not have benefited what was after all, his involvement in a plan ‘to absorb the world’s wealth’ would it?

So was he a merely a controlled and charismatic leader who was seen as the only person capable of leading the people of this country into an ill-advised and extremely costly all-out conflict with Germany?

It now seems highly likely that Hitler had angered those who Churchill served by printing his own money, which of course meant that they had lost control of both him and their plan of using Germany to further their vision of world domination.

As Churchill’s own words to Lord Robert Boothby clearly state:

“Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war, was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.”




Many Western Government’s and the controlled mainstream media rely almost entirely upon the simple fact that many, many people are completely disinterested in world affairs, or have very short memories indeed.

The Media are currently attempting to focus your attention on, as well as drum up support for yet another invasion to combat the latest ‘terrorist’ threat, namely the notoriously elusive but hastily constructed ISIS terror Group, who are alleged by the media to be the real reason behind the instability in Iraq.

*Special media attention is being given to the displacement and refugee status being given to hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Iraqi’s, which may yet prove to be an important aspect if this scenario plays out the way it’s meant to.*

Meanwhile, Foreign Secretary William Hague and the UK Foreign Office are making overtures towards Iran, offering to re-open the British Embassy in Tehran, quoting ‘Circumstances are now right’ to re-establish a diplomatic relationship.

Iran, unless you have forgotten, was fairly recently, a part of what ex-US President George Bush referred to as an ‘Axis Of Evil’, and who, were the main focus of attempts by the media to portray them as being the ‘Mortal Enemy of the West’.

Iran are now the main powerhouse in a very volatile area, they have ties to both Russia and China, and are also seen as being an obvious threat to an alleged globalist agenda to destabilise the whole region.

Western Governments do not make a move without consultation or a direct order from the state of Israel, who also, were threatening an all-out attack on Iran based on their alleged Nuclear capability.

Israel have remained unusually quiet over this, in case you had not noticed.

Is this now a case of ‘my enemies enemy is now my friend’ and to bring these nations together, united against a common adversary ?

Or is it yet another attempt to lay the foundations of a road that can only lead mankind to the brink of another world war ?

Any student of history cannot fail to draw certain comparisons between recent events and certain significant events that preceded and continued throughout the second world war.

We can only hope that these current events lead to a different conclusion, I very much doubt it though.


On October 16th 1933, Franklin Roosevelt granted diplomatic recognition to the Soviet Union.

The Communist government was very close to financial collapse due to a myriad of internal problems.

Giving them this diplomatic status literally saved a government, which, had been ostracized by virtually every other government in the world at that time.

Throughout the rest of the 1930s and the 1940s, two disparate groups infiltrated dozens of agents or members into the US Government’s executive branch under Roosevelt.

Namely, the Communist Party and the Council for Foreign Relations.

While these two groups had radically different motives, they both shared the same aim, which was, in essence, to weaken and eventually destroy American freedom and independence from within.

Almost nobody today, remembers that the second World War began in 1939 because the Soviet Union, as well as Germany, invaded Poland at the same time.

The Soviet Union was equally responsible for the onset of that war as Germany ever was.

This was common knowledge and universally condemned at the time.

However, in 1941 when Hitler attacked Russia, the world’s media made a complete U-Turn, and Russia became a “noble ally” of the Allies and turned against Germany.

Of course, it required the United States to supply the Soviets with the required hardware in order to fulfil their role in fighting the war.

We know now that the rest of the world dutifully fell into line, rushing to “save” Poland and ‘liberate’ the occupied countries of Eastern Europe.

Meanwhile, at YALTA, before the war was over, the United States State Department, agreed that in exchange for their ‘assistance’, the Soviet Union would be allowed to add Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, half of Germany, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, and Bulgaria to its territories in Europe.

Before the addition of those countries and people at the end of the war, Russia had a population of around 160 million people and controlled an area, a great deal smaller than the Russia of the Czars.

Soviet industry had been almost totally destroyed by the Nazi war machine.

Communism was a third rate power, militarily, industrially and economically.

There was conceivably, no apparent reason for the whole of Eastern Europe to be handed over to the Communists other than to concede to the power and influence of Communist agents within The US State Department.

During 1945, General Dwight Eisenhower ordered that an operation Codenamed “Keelhaul” be implemented, it’s main purpose appearing to involve the rounding up and shipping people back, to “their own countries of origin”

This effectively ensured that some 2.5 million Soviet citizens found themselves stranded in Germany and the occupied countries as prisoners of war, slave laborers, or rootless refugees.

From 1944 to 1947, these people were forcibly repatriated in a number of operations, during which, many committed suicide rather than return to Soviet slavery.

The numbers included all refugees from communism: men, women and children, soldier or civilian, male or female – even though many of them had been fighting on the side of the allies during the war.

Since all of Eastern Europe was by then under Communist control, sending these people back was quite literally, a death sentence, some by means of immediate execution, the remainder by slow extermination from being overworked or simply starving to death in enforced labour camps.

These people were routinely rounded up at bayonet point, forced into railway freight cars and shipped off to their deaths.

No accurate records were kept, but a conservative figure estimates their numbers of being between 2 and 5 Million.

The elimination of all these anti-Communist’s therefore made the Communist domination of Eastern Europe much easier.

The American, as well as the European public remained blissfully unaware of this action which Eisenhower enforced rigidly, even though it violated international law, the laws of his own country and also, the laws of humanity itself.

Many Germans were prosecuted at Nuremberg for similar crimes, but the total control of all media outlets ensured that Eisenhower, and those under his command who were accomplices in this outrage, were never officially accused of doing anything wrong.

Ike directly ordered that Operation Keelhaul, ensured that deporting these wholly innocent refugees from eastern Europe, placed them directly into the hands of Josef Stalin.

The Communists, more often than not, machine-gunned these unfortunate people the moment they arrived on Soviet territory – sometimes while they were still being held on the trains.

Almost all of these people had committed no crime, unless of course they had been judged as being guilty of being displaced white Christian’s, who didn’t want to live under Communist tyranny.