All posts tagged USA

The campaign leading up to the 2019 General Election, or as many people view it, the ‘Brexit Election,’ has been one of the most vicious, propaganda-filled, mistruth littered, and ultimately damaging, this country has witnessed in living memory.

Every one of the main political parties have lied, to varying degrees, and have mislead the electorate on a number of important issues, but by far the most pernicious, (and grossly inaccurate) claim, made by Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, is that Boris Johnson and the Conservative and Unionist Party, are ‘going to sell the InterNational Health Service to Donald Trump and the Americans’.

This claim was wholly predictable, however, and the Labour Party’s election campaign has focussed upon, and revolved entirely around this one issue, and it appears to be the only thing they have been able to effectively weaponise.

Your NHS.

On the surface, this untested, and unsubstantiated claim has had a remarkable effect, inasmuch as if more floating voters decide to fall for it, this country could be heading towards a hung parliament; which could mean that the hard-left socialists Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, could obtain the keys to Downing Street, if, and only if, they are supported by an unholy alliance comprising of the Liberal Democrats, The Green Party, and the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists.

Which would, in the light of day, also mean at least four more years of public confusion, electoral chaos, in all possibility the economy crashing,  Brexit being put on hold, or scrapped altogether, which spits in the face of 17.4 Million of the electorate, and years more hardship and misery for millions of people who can least endure it.

So with that in mind, I would like to share the following video with you.

A video which, in my opinion, demolishes Jeremy Corbyn’s claim about the NHS entirely, and should, at the very least, make any person who cares about the truth, (and has grown sick and tired of the sheer arrogance and patronising attitudes shown to them by the current crop of politicians) think long and hard about who they really want – and ultimately trust – to take this once great country forward.

You don’t have to look very hard these days, to find examples of how the mainstream media can twist things to suit whatever narrative they are pushing at any particular moment in time.

Only yesterday for example, the Guardian newspaper published an article, in regard to the claim that Tommy Robinson has launched a public appeal to request that US President Donald Trump, grant him ‘Political Asylum’, because of fears that he may be murdered if sent to prison, after recently being convicted on a contempt charge.

The Guardian, as expected, goes with the headline ‘Tommy Robinson Begs Donald Trump to grant him political asylum in US’, and the journalist goes on to state in the article [in their usual smug and self-righteous manner] that Robinson also ‘alleges’ that ‘British Prisons are controlled by jihadi gangs’.

Upon reading that article, many people would come to the conclusion that Tommy Robinson, is somewhat delusional, and has plucked his claim out of the sky, with little to support it apart from his paranoia, [which is entirely understandable] if that article was taken at face value, which, if I had to guess, is its main and only intention.

So where would Tommy Robinson get the idea that British Prisons are filled with Islamist extremists, who would attempt to kill him should they be given the opportunity?

Apart from the evidence of his own most recent experience of entering the prison system that is?

“A review of Islamist extremism in prisons, probation and youth justice that was commissioned by the government in 2015 found it was a “growing problem”.

Perhaps it could have been from articles like this, published only last year, which the above quote was taken from, and were published in a number of newspapers, including the Guardian, and strangely enough, was written by the same journalist.

In 2015, Islamic Extremism was shown to be a ‘growing problem within British prisons’, and as no contrary reports have emerged in the mainstream media or elsewhere, since then, would it be fair to assume that this particular issue is still a cause for concern for people like Tommy Robinson – or for that matter, anybody who has publicly identified problems in this country, that the left-wing media are desperately trying to deflect the public’s attention from ?

The following article was originally published on the Outlaw in 2014, and passed by relatively un-noticed.

I am republishing it now (with a few tweaks) as I believe it’s even more relevant today than it was a few short years ago, as from what I am witnessing all around today, far too many people are still swallowing the nonsense that is being churned out by the mass media.

As the propaganda and ‘Fear Pornography’ are being cranked up to beyond insanity levels over Vladimir Putin and Russia, it has never been more important to look beyond what you are being told, to start thinking for yourselves, to start asking questions and ultimately – to trust your own gut feelings.


‘In order to fully understand what is happening in the world today, I firmly believe it is vitally important to have an insight into some of the major events of the past.

For example, those of a certain age will, I’m sure, have indelible memories of the tensions created by the ‘fact’ that a single misunderstanding between the protagonists of the quaintly titled ‘Cold War’ could easily have led to the extinction of all life on this planet.

That is only one of many accepted historical ‘events’ that was entirely manufactured, and was preceded by the building of the Berlin Wall in 1961, and the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, and which achieved it’s ultimate aim of helping to reinforce a carefully orchestrated illusion, which placed the world onto not only a war footing, but also into a perpetual state of fear.


M.A.D. Do you remember that?

So what if I were to suggest that the ‘Cold War’ was a complete fabrication, and was something carefully constructed by it’s protagonists to act as a distraction from what was really going on?

That would undoubtedly surprise at least some of you, and in some cases, may not have entered the minds of anyone who feels the need to even ask how (or why) anything like that was able to be implemented.

It is quite simply beyond the realms of most people’s thought processes today, to accept what the government and the mass media say, as being anything other than what they are seeing and hearing on their television and/or radio or read in the newspapers.

So how could an event, like the extensively documented and universally accepted narrative that was the ‘Cold War’, possibly be anything other than what it appeared to be?

Quite easily, when you realise that there is, and always was a completely different narrative written for each segment of the population, with only a select few ever granted access to the original and full version of the ‘script.’

This can be simplified even further, by comparing that situation to one that exists within any multinational corporation, or a large company or organisation which has numerous outlets, subsidiaries and thousands of employees.

Would the employees on the shop or factory floor know the senior executives at Head Office, personally for instance?

Would they be party to what the Chief Executive Officer, or the board of directors did on a daily or hourly basis, or would they only be familiar with their own menial roles, within their own departments, and only then within the immediate structure of the outlying subsidiary where they turn up for work every day?

My guess is that it would be the latter.

NASA for instance, is structured that way.

And getting a straight answer from any of these companies/agencies is as futile an act, as it would be to ask the men who repair potholes in the road, to explain why it is that the people who employ them have covered up decades of child grooming and abuse.

They repair potholes, that is their only role in that agency, and the only information they are made aware of is where the potholes are that need to be repaired, it makes absolutely no difference that they are employed by the same agency, as they are simply not privy to the requested information.


Once the basic principles of a ‘need to know’ basis are understood, and combined with the complete control and the manipulation of all information (via the completely controlled mass media) that is made available to the citizenry, it becomes a fairly simple and straightforward task to make the population of any given country …. believe almost anything.

However ‘impossible’ any given event would be to actually implement, it does not take that much effort to make people believe it …. as all that’s needed is for the mass media to report it as being a ‘fact’ ….

Things would become so much clearer, if people just took a little time to look beyond what they are expected to believe ….


It is relatively easy to observe how manipulation is being used every day, simply by noticing how millions of people are being lied to and led by the nose daily, via the mass media, directed by the established order, along pre-defined paths.

Through Advertising, through Television News, through The Schools/College/University Systems, through The mainstream media and through ‘Campaigns’ fronted by celebrities are the tried and trusted, and most visible methods.

The majority of people are only too willing to accept, and ultimately believe any or all of what is presented to them, even to the point of them becoming angry if they are denied that opportunity, simply because they have been ‘trained’ since birth to do so …. without question.

It is entirely possible that many historic events have utilised a similar template, including the establishment of Communism in specific parts of the world.

There is also very sound reasoning behind the widely held belief, that the old Soviet Unions’ retreat behind the ‘Iron Curtain,’ was simply a dramatic puppet show played out by those who manipulated their childlike audience (us) – using nothing more than the pulling of the right strings.

People simply accept what they have been conditioned to believe.


It has become abundantly clear, that the United States and the Soviet Union shared a close working relationship behind the scenes during the ‘cold war’, while covertly working towards a common goal.

Was this goal, as a number of people have alluded to, part of ‘a combined attempt to “weaponise” the very skies above our heads?’

People’s immediate opinions are more often than not, based on the information that is made available to them.

Information found in the newspapers, on the television, what their own government’s decide to release ‘as being in the public interest’, or more recently, via any number of compromised internet outlets.

That is the reality, and one that is known to work, and work very well, as it has worked ever since the invention of the printing press made the written word available to the population at large.

It is the way that those words are presented which form the basis of what becomes generally held opinion, so if you can control everything that is written and shown on television, it naturally follows that public opinion can also be manipulated by you.

If this manipulation is strictly controlled from the top down, permeating through the schools and higher education systems, trickling down through the medical, legal and political arenas, all mainstream media outlets and all available printed materials, it becomes extremely difficult to find alternatives.

Unless you are prepared to look beyond what you have always been conditioned to believe …. that is.’

The attached video should be viewed in regard to the recent events in Charlottesville that have of course been covered heavily by the mass media, but are not giving their audiences (ie: You) the full, and more importantly, the true picture.

I am sure that you are able to decide for yourselves as to why this may be, and draw your own conclusions as to what is really going on in the United states at the present time.

Please keep visiting the website of EARTHLINGGB from tomorrow, for further information and in-depth details of this unfolding deception story as they emerge..



I am busy at the minute with a number of projects unrelated to this site, a book collaboration and some fairly intensive French nobility bloodline research, which is taking much longer than I initially thought as these things often do.

However, I have been keeping a watchful eye on some events that are currently unfolding both here in Blighty and across the pond, and happened upon a thread on a political forum in the US – which has made a prediction which piqued my interest somewhat.

If you are at all interested in the upcoming race to the White House, which it appears a large number of the readers of this site are, going by the number of emails I receive, the screen capped image below certainly gives food for thought, inasmuch as the kind of tactics that may (or not) come into play if the Clinton Campaign is seen to be faltering.

It may not happen of course, but if it does, it will show beyond a reasonable doubt how political campaigns are rigged every which way but loose, and this is only one tactic that may (or not) get the Democrats (and the Clinton’s) back into the White House and all that that entails.

You should have already guessed by now that Donald Trump has no real intention of becoming POTUS, he never did, his role is simply to ensure the Clintons return to the seat of power by decimating the Republicans vote.

I am not saying that this is what is going to happen, but please do not be surprised (or fooled into believing) if this, or a scenario very similar in nature plays out prior to the polls opening Stateside.



Before you get excited about the alleged ‘leak’ of the so-called #panamapapers,  there are a few aspects that may be worth considering.

The mass media as expected, are drip-feeding carefully controlled snippets of information, possibly to focus attention towards a number of persons and regimes that are deemed to be ‘hostile’, or that are viewed as being ‘targets’ of both the USA and the U.K.

‘The papers are an ‘unprecedented leak’ of 11.5 million files from the database of the world’s fourth biggest offshore law firm, Mossack Fonseca. The records were obtained from an anonymous source by the German newspaper Süddeneutsche Zeitung, which shared them with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) who in turn then shared them with a large network of international partners, including the Guardian, the BBC and other Media Outlets.’ – SOURCE

The ICIJ, is a global network of more than 190 investigative journalists in more than 65 countries who collaborate on in-depth investigative stories.

Founded in 1997 by the respected American Journalist Chuck Lewis, it was launched as a project to focus on issues that ‘do not stop at national frontiers, cross-border crime, corruption, and the accountability of power’ ….

Where have we heard that before?

Moving on, their Advisory Comittee comprises of some of the biggest names in investigative journalism, and their homepage states:

“The need for such an organisation has never been greater. Globalisation and development have placed extraordinary pressures on human societies, posing unprecedented threats from polluting industries, transnational crime networks, rogue states, and the actions of powerful figures in business and government. Our aim is to bring journalists from different countries together in teams – eliminating rivalry and promoting collaboration. Together we aim to be the world’s best cross-border investigative team.”

Noble words indeed, and an organisation such as the ICIJ could not of course, exist without financial support, and although they do operate as a non-profit organisation, they admit to relying heavily on charitable foundations and on financial support from the public, as they also stress: ‘Cross-border investigative journalism is among the most expensive and riskiest in the world’….

Among the recent ICIJ funders are some very well-known names, including: The Ford Foundation, The David and Lucille Packard Foundation, Open Society Foundation, The Sigrid Rausing Trust and the Waterloo Foundation.

Looking at one of those named funders, according to WIKIPEDIA, the OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION was founded by one GEORGE SOROS, who sits as it’s Chairman, and JONATHAN SOROS, who is listed as being it’s ‘Global Advisory Board Member’.

Taking any or all of the above into consideration, would it be entirely wrong to suggest that many of the names contained within this, or any similar ‘leak’ will never be made public?

Although the carefully selected list of names that have already been published on a number of media outlets make impressive reading, on the surface that is – will the true scope of what has been really going on, hit the front pages anytime soon?

I very much doubt it.


“The New Years Eve release of over 3000 new Hillary Clinton emails from the State Department has CNN abuzz over gossipy text messages, the ‘who gets to ride with Hilary’ selection process set up by her staff, and how a ‘cute’ Hillary photo fared on Facebook.”


CNN, however, have, along with other mainstream media outlets, been somewhat remiss in reporting on the more ‘explosive’ confirmations about Libya, which were also contained in the latest set of Clinton Email releases.

Admissions of rebel war crimes, special ops trainers being placed inside Libya from the very beginning of the protests preceding the invasion, Al Queda being firmly embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, western nations fighting to gain access to the Libyan oil fields, the real origins of the ridiculous Viagra-fuelled mass rape claims, and what may have been the real reason why the NATO-backed coalition effectively destroyed the country – the concern over Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, which would have directly competed with both the Euro and the Dollar.

One of those who predicted that Mu’ummar Qaddafi would be overthrown and Libya utterly destroyed was Quaddafi himself, who in his final speeches, told of a future Libya mired in utter chaos, endless civil conflict, western interference and a breeding ground for Jihadi fundamentalism and extremists.

 “In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the merciful….

For forty years, or was it longer, I can’t remember, I did all I could to give people houses, hospitals, schools, and when they were hungry, I gave them food.

I even made Benghazi into farmland from the desert, I stood up to attacks from that cowboy Ronald Reagan, when he killed my adopted orphaned daughter, he was trying to kill me, instead he killed that poor innocent child.

Then I helped my brothers and sisters from Africa with money for the African Union.

I did all I could to help people understand the concept of real democracy, where people’s committee’s ran our country.

But that was never enough, as some told me, even people who had ten room houses, new suits and furniture, were never satisfied, as selfish as they were – they wanted more.

They told Americans and other visitors, that they ‘needed democracy’ and needed ‘freedom’ never realising that democracy was a cut-throat system, where the biggest dog eats the rest, but they were enchanted with those words, never realising that in America, there was no free medicine, no free hospitals, no free housing, no free education and no free food, except when people had to beg on the streets or stand in long lines to get soup.

No, no matter what I did, it was never enough for some, but for others, they knew I was the son of Gamel Abdel Nasser, the only true Arab and Muslim leader we’ve had since Salah-al-Deen, when he claimed the Suez Canal for his people, as I claimed Libya, for my people.

It was his footsteps I tried to follow, to keep my people free from colonial domination – from thieves who would steal from us.

Now, I am under attack by the biggest force in military history, my little African son, Obama wants to kill me, to take away the freedom of our country, to take away our free housing, our free medicine, our free education, our free food, and replace it with American style thievery, called ‘Capitalism’, but all of us in the Third World know what that means.

It means that corporations run the countries, run the world and its the people who will suffer.

So, there is no alternative for me, I must make my stand, and if Allah wishes, I shall die following his path, the path that has made our country rich with farmland, with good food and health, and even allowed us to help our African and Arab brothers and sisters.

I do not wish to die, but if it comes to that, to save this land, my people, all the thousands who are all my children, then so be it.

Let this testament be my voice to the world, that I stood up to crusader attacks of NATO, stood up to cruelty, stood up to betrayal, stood up to the West and it’s colonist ambitions, and that I stood with my African brothers, my true Arab and Muslim brothers, as a beacon of light.

When others were building castles, I lived in a modest house, and in my tent. I never once forgot my youth in Sirté, I did not spend our national treasury foolishly, and like Salah-al-Deen, our great Muslim leader, who rescued Jerusalem for Islam, I took little for myself….

In the West, some have called me ‘Mad Dog’ and ‘Crazy’, but they know the truth yet continue to lie, they know that our land is independent and free, not in the colonial grip, that my vision, my path, is, and has been clear and for my people and that I will fight to my last breath to keep us free, may Allah almighty help us to remain faithful and free”.

It is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the extent to which, we, as a sovereign nation here in the UK, are being blatantly lied to, and distracted from what is really happening in the world, by the mainstream media.

For those out there with little or no access to the Internet, it would prove almost impossible to get information other than what is churned out by the established news outlets, which in turn are almost entirely funded and controlled by groups who’s only allegiances are to global corporations and financial institutions.

“There is no such thing, at this date of the world history, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell out his own country for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting of an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of the rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our very lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” – John Swinton, the former Chief of Staff at the New York Times in 1922.

Things are no different today, and the stark reality is that the greater majority of people are not even aware of it. Today, in the United States, a select group of super-rich families and tightly-knit financial interests own the media outright and in turn control the U.S. government via their ownership and absolute control of that media.

In the UK, and throughout the rest of the world, there is no reason to think it’s not a similar situation.

Apart from the obvious ‘mis-reporting’ of the truth, the mass media have another purpose, which is to ‘mis-direct’ and steer you away from what you are not allowed to see and hear about, by dissemination of carefully selected snippets of information which are designed to seep into the collective psyche without actually providing any real answers.

A tried and tested process, which provides just enough information to it’s targeted audience, and which does not allow a direct response or clarification that a conversation or an open discussion would have.

In other words, dissemination of news to a large number of people, can present itself as having multiple meanings to each individual depending on their experience, their attitudes, their prior knowledge, their ethnicity, their religious beliefs or even their gender.

One size, certainly does not fit all in this case, and once the basic information is planted in this manner, the harvesting of what emerges from that, may be as far removed from the reality as it is possible to be.

Many of us are witnessing this right now, with the duplicitous manner in which the mass media have presented their coverage of alleged historic childhood sexual abuse, especially if those allegations have been linked with prominent establishment figures for instance.

But where the mainstream media really excel, is in their mis-reporting of ‘foreign‘ or ‘non-domestic‘ news.

The current situation unfolding in Syria is a good example of how the mainstream media spins a skewed version of what may be really happening, inasmuch as their negative coverage of Putin and Russia’s role in ‘assisting’ the Assad regime.

Is Putin genuinely aligning the military might of Russia with an ‘enemy of the west’?

Or is he acutely aware of the possible effects that Syria falling will have on not only the whole of the Middle East region, but mother Russia herself and consequently the rest of the world?

Imagine the following if you will:

If Saudi Arabia, (as is now widely believed) are funding the Tory Party in the UK, the government of the United States as well as the French Government, and are also financially backing rebel Jihadist terror groups around the world, including in the UK and of course the same Wahhibi crackpots who are trying to destroy Syria – things begin to make a lot more sense.

Syria is being attacked because they are a free, independent and sovereign state, which does not fit into the template being drawn up for the region by the international banking system and the giant power corporations who, no doubt have an interest in the enormous gas fields that lie beneath Syria.

Assad, who heads a nationalist government, would use the revenue from the sales of that gas for the people of Syria, and that is not going to be tolerated by the western powers.

Syria as a country, is not particularly important to the globalists, (apart from its gas fields) it is being destroyed so Israel can continue to wipe the Palestinians off the face of the earth, plus following the destruction of Syria, they can also attack Iran through Iraq.

From there they may go on to attack Belarus, and when both Iran and Belarus have fallen – they are at the Russian border.

The international bankers hate Russia, because under Putin they have broken away from the internationalists who previously had a stranglehold on the country.

Putin has re-established Russia as a Nationalist, Christian, and sovereign state and as such is the main target for the internationalists.

There may well come a time, and not too far away, that the only way the UK, or any other European nation will be allowed to regain their freedom and independence from the clutches of the internationalist bankers, will be with the backing of Russia.

And for Europe to survive, it needs Russia.

But that is something you will never see in the mainstream media, and it’ll not feature prominently in the so-called ‘Alternative Media’ for that matter.

It may be worth thinking about, why that would be?

A ‘False Flag’ (or black flag) describes covert operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.

Operations carried out during peace-time by civilian organisations, as well as covert government agencies, may also be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organisation behind an operation.

Sometimes the term is used to refer to those acts carried out by “military or security force personnel, which are then blamed on terrorists.”

The term may also refer to those events which governments are cognisant of and able to stop but choose to allow to happen (or “stand down”), as a strategy to entangle or prepare the nation for war. Furthermore, the term “false flag terrorism” may even be used in those instances when violence is carried out by groups or organisations which, whether they know it or not, are being supported or controlled by the “victim” nation.

Some argue that false flags are methods used by deep states as a form of deep politics.

The name “false flag” has its origins in naval warfare where the use of a flag other than the belligerent’s true battle flag as a ruse de guerre, before engaging the enemy, has long been accepted.

Such operations are also accepted in certain circumstances in land warfare, to deceive enemies in similar ways providing that the deception is not perfidious and all such deceptions are discarded before opening fire upon the enemy.

In a quiet suburb of London, sits a complex of buildings known as the Tavistock Center, devoted to the “study” of what is known as “human relations.” From this ob­scure location, an invisible army of social engineers, psychi­atrists, psychoanalysts, psychological warfare experts, and brainwashing technicians have been both created and deployed – and which are directly responsible for creating many of the False Flag outrages that have been carried out throughout the world over the last few decades.

This network was also believed to be behind the mass slaughter of the Bosnian and Croatian peoples in the Balkans.



The following list of ‘False Flags’ are only the ones that the perpetrators have ‘owned up to’.

Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This was known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found:

“Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….”

Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War, and Putin.

Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed).
The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950’s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.
The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.
The British Prime Minister Harold MacMillan, admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.
The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.
As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security”.
(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred).
They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.
In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country.

The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba.


In 1963, the U.S. Department of defence wrote a paper promoting attacks within the organisation American States – such as Trinidad – Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.”

In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

The German government admitted that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

A Mossad agent says that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC (the African National Congress) by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, and framed the ANC for the bombing.

An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings.

An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya.

According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organisation.

The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombing.

As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered seven innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials. Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

Similarly, the U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties.

Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction (despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers).

Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

United Press International reported in June 2005: U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers.

At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

Egyptian politicians admitted that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants.

The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Newspaper, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

The former Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others.

Britain’s security services have admitted they Carry out “digital false flag” attacks on targeted people, framing them by writing offensive or unlawful material.… and blaming it on their targets.