Tag Archives: Schools


I was sent an email recently, from a friend in Stockholm, Sweden, expressing concern about a note that had been sent to all parents of the school their children attended.

This note was not officially sanctioned by the school, nor the education authority, so cannot be viewed as being official policy, but is concerning nonetheless, as it addresses something that has become a serious issue in a number of European countries.

A school in a small town in Germany, however, has taken a more formal stance and it’s head teacher has sent out a  simarly worded letter to parents, asking them to ensure that their daughters ‘cover up their arms and legs for their own protection’ – against local Syrian “refugees.”

In this letter, Martin Thalhammer, the head of the Willhelm-Diess-Gymnasium, in the town of Pocking, Bavaria, which has a population of around 15,000 – female students have been asked to refrain from wearing “revealing clothes” because refugee accommodation has been set up next to the schools gym.

School Letter 1

Hundreds of Syrians have been housed in Pocking, as part of the ongoing plan to accommodate the 400,000 “asylum applications” expected this year, to join the 202,815 who have already re-located to Germany as a whole.

The headmaster’s letter also warned the female students against wearing immodest clothes and announced that the schools gymnasium had been shut down as a ‘precautionary measure’ – and the physical education classes would be moved to a neighbouring primary school.

“The Syrian citizens are mainly Muslim and speak Arabic. The refugees are marked by their own culture. Because our school is directly next to where they are staying, modest clothing must be adhered to. Revealing tops or blouses, shorts or miniskirts could lead to misunderstandings”.

These “misunderstandings” to which the letter refers are, of course, unwarranted attention or even sexual attacks upon the teenagers, as has happened elsewhere in European countries where large numbers of mainly male, ‘refugees’ have settled.

In Sweden for example, where as I mentioned earlier I have friends who initially contacted me with very real concerns, the number of rapes has increased so dramatically over the last few years, that the country has now been officially classified as ‘The Rape Capital of the West’, and also holds the unenviable position of being second in the world, behind Lesotho in Southern Africa, for this type of offence.

The letter continues:

“For the refugees, access to the school gardens and buildings is strictly forbidden. The same goes for the school grounds during the day. The number of teachers on duty during class breaks has also been increased”.

The letter, finished with a warning to the children, which some parents have justifiably viewed as being delivered in a somewhat threatening manner, in which the children were told to refrain from:

“Direct eyeballing, ogling or taking pictures”, and went on to say: “Derogatory or racial remarks cannot and will not be tolerated in any way.”


With Thanks to Sangeeta.







There is a word, that has for more than a few years, been one of the most effective ways of stifling free speech and creating abject fear that is currently available.

It has been used by Politicians to both silence and slander traditionalist or nationalist opposition, it has been used to close down debate, and it’s use usually leaves political opponents in fear of recrimination and even physical attack.

In everyday life, it has been used with great effect, causing almost irreparable damage by brainwashing both children and students, who then grow up into adults who are deeply ashamed of, and even to a degree hating their own country, their traditions, their culture and eventually even themselves and their countrymen.


That word, unless you hadn’t already worked it out – is ‘Racist’.

So where did this odious and entirely destructive noun originate?

Most people believe it’s been around for centuries, although very few of them could pinpoint with any accuracy, the date and the first time it was used, and for what purpose it was designed, I shouldn’t think.

The origins of the word is almost always never discussed, and even those on the ultra hard core right wing, would struggle if pressed to explain further.trotsky_words

The above passage, is taken from “The History of the Russian Revolution”, and the last word is “расистов”, who’s Latin translation is ‘racistov’ (Racist).

That work was produced in 1930, and is the first time in written history, in which that word is to be found being used in that particular context.

Try it, check the Internet, go through any number of books at your library, reference works or otherwise, and examine Microfiches of historical documents if you are able – you will not find an earlier usage of that word.

So who was the author, and the inventor of this word?


Well, as it turns out, the word ‘Racist’ was invented by one of the principal architects of the 74-year Soviet nightmare, and the founder and leader of the Red Army – one Lev Davidovich Bronshtein (1879 – 1940).

If that name is unfamiliar, maybe you will recognise the name he is better known by…. Leon Trotsky

So with this in mind, what was Leon Trotsky’s reasoning behind the invention of this word?

Maybe a full English translation of the previous referred to passage may offer an explanation.

“Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Mark remarked upon this theme: “In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them.” This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the ‘racists.'”

The ‘Slavophiles’ which he refers to, were historically a group of traditionalist Slavs who greatly valued their native culture and way of life, and were desperate to protect it.

Trotsky, however, saw them and others like them as being an impediment to his internationalist communist plans for enslaving the entire world.

He did not care about the Slavic Russians whom he claimed to serve, as to him, Slavophiles, were Slavs that had committed the mortal ‘crime’ of loving their own people and trying to protect their traditional way of life.

He decreed that they were simply ‘backward’, and anybody who thought as they did, were simply ‘racists’.

So, the reality of the word ‘racist‘ is very different from the liberal’s version of the story they continually perpetuate, which is, that the word was used to identify people who were ‘bigoted against certain racial groups, and should be used by all decent people to protect racial minorities from bigots.’

The truth is that the concept behind the word, that ethnic ‘backwardness’ must always be secondary to ‘enlightened’ internationalism – was used with great effect by Commissar Trotsky to justify the Communists’ murderous rampages against races of people who had simply tried to protect their traditional way of life from being replaced by what was to them, an alien system.

Those who use that word freely to cower behind, and as a defence to effectively ‘neuter’ their critics, have now grown exponentially from a handful of communists, to almost all corners of the ‘civilised’ world.

So Leon Trotsky, with the invention of that single, simple word, would arguably be responsible for causing more damage to the West – than Josef Stalin and the subsequent entire nuclear arsenal of Russia could have ever dreamt of.

He gave limitless power to the most despicable and traitorous elements within the west, which enabled them to systematically ‘rebrand’ anyone who was loyal to their own people, their cultural traditions and way of life as being ‘evil’.

Which in turn, brings us to the present, where we have had successive governments, an education system and a controlled mainstream media who have reinforced this Marxist ideology to the point where almost everyone is afraid to question it.

Even some of those who exist within the realms of the so-called ‘Alternative Media’ are actively promoting this, for want of a better word, ‘Agenda’, by referring to their critics as being, among other things…. ‘Racist’.

It’s also a good indicator, if one was to question whether a particular ‘truther’ they follow is ‘controlled opposition’ for instance, in the absence of anything immediately obvious that is.