All posts tagged Lies

The campaign leading up to the 2019 General Election, or as many people view it, the ‘Brexit Election,’ has been one of the most vicious, propaganda-filled, mistruth littered, and ultimately damaging, this country has witnessed in living memory.

Every one of the main political parties have lied, to varying degrees, and have mislead the electorate on a number of important issues, but by far the most pernicious, (and grossly inaccurate) claim, made by Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, is that Boris Johnson and the Conservative and Unionist Party, are ‘going to sell the InterNational Health Service to Donald Trump and the Americans’.

This claim was wholly predictable, however, and the Labour Party’s election campaign has focussed upon, and revolved entirely around this one issue, and it appears to be the only thing they have been able to effectively weaponise.

Your NHS.

On the surface, this untested, and unsubstantiated claim has had a remarkable effect, inasmuch as if more floating voters decide to fall for it, this country could be heading towards a hung parliament; which could mean that the hard-left socialists Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, could obtain the keys to Downing Street, if, and only if, they are supported by an unholy alliance comprising of the Liberal Democrats, The Green Party, and the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists.

Which would, in the light of day, also mean at least four more years of public confusion, electoral chaos, in all possibility the economy crashing,  Brexit being put on hold, or scrapped altogether, which spits in the face of 17.4 Million of the electorate, and years more hardship and misery for millions of people who can least endure it.

So with that in mind, I would like to share the following video with you.

A video which, in my opinion, demolishes Jeremy Corbyn’s claim about the NHS entirely, and should, at the very least, make any person who cares about the truth, (and has grown sick and tired of the sheer arrogance and patronising attitudes shown to them by the current crop of politicians) think long and hard about who they really want – and ultimately trust – to take this once great country forward.

In all conscience, I would not be able to settle if I sat back and said nothing about what may well be, one of the most misleading and wholly disingenuous mainstream media articles that I have read for many a year.

I am of course, referring to something that was published earlier today, in the online version of the Daily Mirror, in regard to a recent YouTube video that was published by ex-East17 band member Brian Harvey.

Now anybody reading that headline, would almost certainly assume that Mr Harvey has totally lost the plot, and by drawing the readers attention to Mr Harvey’s claims that, he ‘has not been outside for five years’, and ‘has clones‘, leaves very little doubt as to the Mirror’s real intent.

To both totally discredit him and negate anything what Mr Harvey says (or presents evidence of wrongdoing) from now on perhaps?

If one was to read the article at face value, and accept what it says, it will of course have served it’s purpose, but if one was to look at what is not being said in the article, then things may appear a little clearer.

Now, I owe Mr Harvey nothing, as I believe that he has not done himself any favour’s lately, inasmuch as he has been taking advice from people on Social Media who are directly linked to the ‘Shadowy People’ he genuinely believes are trying to kill him, and he has made a grave error in stating that he has ‘not been outside for five years’ – when only recently he was protesting outside Downing Street, accompanied by a cameraman.However, the Mirrors’ claim that Mr Harvey has said that he ‘has clones’ is almost certainly a conscious attempt to make Mr Harvey appear delusional, as if they had done even the most basic research, they would have known that Mr Harvey, in a number of YouTube uploads and on his Twitter account – makes it perfectly clear that the ‘Clones’ he refers to, are in fact, ‘cloned images’ of the data stored on a hard disk drive, in the computer that was seized by the Metropolitan Police during his earlier arrest.

‘Disk cloning is the process of copying the contents of one computer hard disk to another disk or to an “image” file. This may be done straight from one disk to another, but more often, the contents of the first disk are written to an image file as an intermediate step, then the second disk is loaded with the contents of the image. Typically, this is done for archiving purposes, to restore lost or damaged data, or to move wanted data into a new disk, though other reasons also exist.

Unlike standard copying functions, disk cloning involves copying hidden and in-use files, and thus presents special challenges, as those types of files are typically not available for copying. Additional complications arise when the process is used for networked computers, as the network must be able to distinguish between different computers. Post-cloning operations may be necessary to address these and other issues’. – WIKIPEDIA

As for the rest of the article? …. It’s simply attempting to bring to the readers attention, a number of old negative news articles about Mr Harvey, that are already in the public domain, to flesh out what is in fact, a really lazy, and sloppy attempt to once again smear the man, possibly in response to the fact that Mr Harvey’s video has now gone viral …. is attracting a lot of attention, and the evidence he has to hand regarding phone hacking, by journalists (amongst others), may be starting to make somebody, very, very nervous indeed.

The following article was originally published on the Outlaw in 2014, and passed by relatively un-noticed.

I am republishing it now (with a few tweaks) as I believe it’s even more relevant today than it was a few short years ago, as from what I am witnessing all around today, far too many people are still swallowing the nonsense that is being churned out by the mass media.

As the propaganda and ‘Fear Pornography’ are being cranked up to beyond insanity levels over Vladimir Putin and Russia, it has never been more important to look beyond what you are being told, to start thinking for yourselves, to start asking questions and ultimately – to trust your own gut feelings.


‘In order to fully understand what is happening in the world today, I firmly believe it is vitally important to have an insight into some of the major events of the past.

For example, those of a certain age will, I’m sure, have indelible memories of the tensions created by the ‘fact’ that a single misunderstanding between the protagonists of the quaintly titled ‘Cold War’ could easily have led to the extinction of all life on this planet.

That is only one of many accepted historical ‘events’ that was entirely manufactured, and was preceded by the building of the Berlin Wall in 1961, and the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, and which achieved it’s ultimate aim of helping to reinforce a carefully orchestrated illusion, which placed the world onto not only a war footing, but also into a perpetual state of fear.


M.A.D. Do you remember that?

So what if I were to suggest that the ‘Cold War’ was a complete fabrication, and was something carefully constructed by it’s protagonists to act as a distraction from what was really going on?

That would undoubtedly surprise at least some of you, and in some cases, may not have entered the minds of anyone who feels the need to even ask how (or why) anything like that was able to be implemented.

It is quite simply beyond the realms of most people’s thought processes today, to accept what the government and the mass media say, as being anything other than what they are seeing and hearing on their television and/or radio or read in the newspapers.

So how could an event, like the extensively documented and universally accepted narrative that was the ‘Cold War’, possibly be anything other than what it appeared to be?

Quite easily, when you realise that there is, and always was a completely different narrative written for each segment of the population, with only a select few ever granted access to the original and full version of the ‘script.’

This can be simplified even further, by comparing that situation to one that exists within any multinational corporation, or a large company or organisation which has numerous outlets, subsidiaries and thousands of employees.

Would the employees on the shop or factory floor know the senior executives at Head Office, personally for instance?

Would they be party to what the Chief Executive Officer, or the board of directors did on a daily or hourly basis, or would they only be familiar with their own menial roles, within their own departments, and only then within the immediate structure of the outlying subsidiary where they turn up for work every day?

My guess is that it would be the latter.

NASA for instance, is structured that way.

And getting a straight answer from any of these companies/agencies is as futile an act, as it would be to ask the men who repair potholes in the road, to explain why it is that the people who employ them have covered up decades of child grooming and abuse.

They repair potholes, that is their only role in that agency, and the only information they are made aware of is where the potholes are that need to be repaired, it makes absolutely no difference that they are employed by the same agency, as they are simply not privy to the requested information.


Once the basic principles of a ‘need to know’ basis are understood, and combined with the complete control and the manipulation of all information (via the completely controlled mass media) that is made available to the citizenry, it becomes a fairly simple and straightforward task to make the population of any given country …. believe almost anything.

However ‘impossible’ any given event would be to actually implement, it does not take that much effort to make people believe it …. as all that’s needed is for the mass media to report it as being a ‘fact’ ….

Things would become so much clearer, if people just took a little time to look beyond what they are expected to believe ….


It is relatively easy to observe how manipulation is being used every day, simply by noticing how millions of people are being lied to and led by the nose daily, via the mass media, directed by the established order, along pre-defined paths.

Through Advertising, through Television News, through The Schools/College/University Systems, through The mainstream media and through ‘Campaigns’ fronted by celebrities are the tried and trusted, and most visible methods.

The majority of people are only too willing to accept, and ultimately believe any or all of what is presented to them, even to the point of them becoming angry if they are denied that opportunity, simply because they have been ‘trained’ since birth to do so …. without question.

It is entirely possible that many historic events have utilised a similar template, including the establishment of Communism in specific parts of the world.

There is also very sound reasoning behind the widely held belief, that the old Soviet Unions’ retreat behind the ‘Iron Curtain,’ was simply a dramatic puppet show played out by those who manipulated their childlike audience (us) – using nothing more than the pulling of the right strings.

People simply accept what they have been conditioned to believe.


It has become abundantly clear, that the United States and the Soviet Union shared a close working relationship behind the scenes during the ‘cold war’, while covertly working towards a common goal.

Was this goal, as a number of people have alluded to, part of ‘a combined attempt to “weaponise” the very skies above our heads?’

People’s immediate opinions are more often than not, based on the information that is made available to them.

Information found in the newspapers, on the television, what their own government’s decide to release ‘as being in the public interest’, or more recently, via any number of compromised internet outlets.

That is the reality, and one that is known to work, and work very well, as it has worked ever since the invention of the printing press made the written word available to the population at large.

It is the way that those words are presented which form the basis of what becomes generally held opinion, so if you can control everything that is written and shown on television, it naturally follows that public opinion can also be manipulated by you.

If this manipulation is strictly controlled from the top down, permeating through the schools and higher education systems, trickling down through the medical, legal and political arenas, all mainstream media outlets and all available printed materials, it becomes extremely difficult to find alternatives.

Unless you are prepared to look beyond what you have always been conditioned to believe …. that is.’

Publishing a site such as the Outlaw brings with it a certain responsibility, not only to it’s readers and those who comment here, but also to the people who wish to remain anonymous and have contacted the site looking for answers to any number of questions.

Of course, it would be physically impossible for anyone to be able to answer questions in a manner that would satisfy everybody, but whenever I can, I always endeavor to steer people towards more knowledgeable folk, or credible agencies who are able to help with queries that I cannot adequately deal with.

Sometimes though, when the same question is being asked by a number of people, I will usually try to formulate a response, by way of a published article on the Outlaw, such as the one you are about to read.

One of the questions I have been asked the most lately, and not only on this site but by way of private messages on social media, and which appears to be troubling a lot of people at the present time is;



Now, I am not going to claim that I am able to offer a definitive answer by any means, but as it’s a question that has been asked by so many people, it’s not something that I can comfortably ignore.

It would have helped, of course to have been furnished with some background as to why this question would be asked, or in what context the query has arisen …. but in the absence of said background, I shall assume that’s it’s more of a generalized question and is not related to any specific event or named person.

There can be any number of reasons why anyone would purposely spread disinformation or falsehoods online, and I will use as only one example of many, many more, the recent re-emergence of people who are desperately trying to push the belief that ‘Satanic Ritual Abuse’ is a cast iron reality, despite the clear lack of evidence that would be needed to support such a theory.

For the record, I have not met with, or have had contact with a single genuine survivor of abuse who supports the idea that SRA exists, ever, and many survivors are in fact, very angry that this issue is being pushed in such an aggressive way online, that it has effectively drowned out the voices of genuine survivors.

The mass media hasn’t helped with this at all, as it has simply tarred all survivors with the same brush, perhaps as a means to discredit the genuine accounts from gaining any real traction?

Claims of SRA have emerged every decade or so, and had it’s heyday in the 1980s when there appeared to have been a worldwide epidemic of alleged incidences of SRA – which may have arisen from law enforcement agencies’ system-wide failure to prosecute the sexual abuse of children up to and during the 1970s.

Or, it could have been due to the methods in which child abuse was reported being updated, and in America the Department of Justice had a great deal of success in prosecuting the purveyors of Child pornography after finally stepping up to the plate by the 1980s after years of lobbying by campaigners.

Whatever the reason may be, and over the last couple of years, increasingly lurid and truly shocking SRA narratives have emerged, and the number of allegations have increased exponentially.

So why is it happening, who is responsible, and what is the objective?

In regard to the people responsible, it could be as simple as the reporting of lurid, and unspeakably horrible tales always attract an audience, and as with any audience, the opportunity to cash in will present itself, inasmuch as the more traffic a website receives, if that website is also ‘monetized’ …. then the motive becomes only too obvious.

But what about those people who do not appear to have a financial incentive, what is their motivation?

In order to answer that, I believe that it’s important to look at the people themselves, and at what could be interpreted as the ‘righteous zeal’ that often accompanies their online (and offline) behavior.

The greater majority of these people are without a doubt, ‘believers’, and will continue to believe in everything they are saying and doing regardless of the repercussions, the possible consequences or the implausibility of their claims.

I do not believe, however, that these ‘beliefs’ simply appeared to them one day, that they woke up one morning and decided to set out on some kind of divine mission to covert anyone who would listen, into believing as they do – I am of the firm opinion that what they now believe, was put in their heads, and purposely so.

How is that possible?

When you look a little closer at some these people, it is quite easy to work out that they all fit within a certain demographic; they are very similar in a number of ways, and one of those ways is that they all display certain characteristics …. traits, if you prefer, that are not immediately obvious to those who do not possess manipulative tendencies bordering on the sociopathic, or happen to be malignant narcissists.

People who are desperate for attention, who really want to fit in or belong to something, are possibly vulnerable in some way, and who may also have some underlying or obvious mental health issues and spent most of their lives being socially isolated for example, are ideal targets for sociopaths and narcissists, who are themselves quite expert at seeking out such people, and by their very nature will then use them to their own ends.

I am not talking about the organ grinders here, the string-pullers and the so-called ‘big hitters’ of the alternative media like Icke, Gerrish, Spivey and the like, as their agenda’s are screamingly obvious to all, or should be by now at least – the people I am going to highlight here are the ‘hangers on’ , who follow them and breathe in every word they say and treat it as some sort of quasi-religious experience.

The late Richard Webster described it perfectly when he wrote:

‘Although some observers might feel that the kind of righteousness described here is at odds with the indifference to the truth which Taylor appears sometimes to have shown, to think in this manner is to fail to understand what might be called  ‘the psychology of righteousness’. For throughout human history the pattern of conduct displayed by those people who seem to be motivated by a burning conviction in the rightness of a particular cause has been disturbing. Again and again it becomes apparent that those whose consciousness is dominated by feelings of righteousness, appear to be psychologically incapable of weighing the moral significance of individual acts according to any calculus, other than one derived from their own most passionate beliefs. Indeed, feelings of righteousness sometimes play such a role in an individual’s self-image that they overpower ordinary moral sensitivity. Such feelings make it psychologically difficult to acknowledge even the possibility that any action taken in pursuit of an aim which is considered right could conceivably be bad or immoral.’

My own thoughts on this are that a person of the ‘type’ I outlined above, and who desperately wants, and needs to fit in and be a part of something which is infinitely more attractive and exciting than anything that has happened in their own lives thus far …. are very, very easy to manipulate.

Whenever I see these disparate groups promoting these type of stories, and the way they defend both their own and each other’s behavior, it puts me in mind of something that I spent some time studying almost forty years ago, and makes more sense to me in regard to this than almost anything else I have been able to find online.

A group of Jack The Ripper enthusiasts were discussing the ubiquitous ‘Royal Killer’ theory in 1979, where the subject of John Netley ‘The Phantom Coachman’ came up, and the group looked at every possible reason why such a nondescript little man, a complete ‘Nobody’ and petty criminal, could have been persuaded to perform what were some pretty gruesome tasks.

Netley, for those of you who are unfamiliar with the story, was the man who was named by the Author Stephen Knight as being the man who lured the victims of Jack The Ripper into a coach he was asked to drive, which contained (allegedly) both the Ripper (Queen Victoria’s personal physician) and an accomplice.

Netley was sworn to obedience, according to Knight, by being made to believe (by the Freemasons) that he was being asked to perform a  ‘Great Task’, his participation was vital and would benefit not only the whole population, but the Crown itself was under threat if he refused.

He genuinely believed, out of the thousands of other coach drivers that operated in London in 1888, that he had been specifically ‘chosen to undertake a special task which was a matter of National Security.’

For a man like Netley, who had been scraping a living at the very bottom of the social scale his entire life, and who had desperately wanted, with every fibre of his being, to be accepted, even welcomed into the very society he had watched for many years with envious eyes – the decision was easy.

He did it ….

Even though Mr Knights version of the Ripper story has long been discounted as a work of fiction, and John Netley probably never even existed, the basic premise is sound, inasmuch as anyone like Netley, who hovers around the type of people he admires and aspires to be accepted by, is easy prey to the manipulators and morally bankrupt types who operate within the higher end of both the alternative, and to a degree, the mass media.

And that is even before you begin to consider other agencies who operate on behalf of the establishment, using similar tactics to ‘plant stories’, spread false information and effectively muddy the waters online to distract, confuse and redirect attention elsewhere.

Something to consider perhaps?

Oh! And in case you were were wondering what happened to Mr Netley?

He was killed after being run over by his own carriage, less than a week after the last victim of Jack The Ripper, Mary Kelly, was discovered.

The coroners verdict was one of ‘Accidental Death’….

I was sent a video this evening by someone who wanted to hear my thoughts on it, and to also ask if I could look over it and ascertain if there was any truth in it.

The video (which I have not linked to here, but have taken some stills from) was published by UK Column on their website recently, and appears to be an attempt to cast suspicion upon and undermine a UK-Based Childhood Abuse Survivors Group, namely ‘Shatter Boys UK’.

In the video, the studio hosts are seen talking via a video link with someone calling themselves @Albion_Rover, and are discussing at length, what appears to be a simple spelling error which appears on the Companies House Website.

The spelling error they appear to be getting very excited about is the name of Daniel WOLSTENCROFT, which has appeared on the Companies House website as WOLSTENHOLM, Daniel, and the clever people at UK Column have helpfully superimposed a screenshot of Mr Wolstencroft’s biography which is listed on the website of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), as Mr Wolstencroft sits on the Victims and Survivors Consultative Panel (VSCP) along with eight other people.

Along with this spelling error, which UK Column are claiming is highly suspicious and based on that claim, they have demanded answers from Mr Wolstencroft as to how this error has occurred.

The two UK Column hosts and their Scottish news stringer, have also made a clear reference to a Fraudulent Insurance Claim which occurred in October 2013, which involved a man also named Daniel Wolstencroft, and have attempted to draw the viewers attention to the possibility that these two men are in fact …. the same person!

These claims have now spilled over onto social media, and from what I have been observing myself, and from what a number of sources are also telling me, it now appears that a closely-linked group on social media have now picked up on this, and ganged up on Mr Wolstencroft, surrounding him like starving jackals, demanding that he explains to them personally how the spelling error occurred on the Companies House Website, and if he is in fact the person that UK Column have referred to as having been involved in a fraudulent insurance claim.

Mr Wolstencroft has I believe, ‘blocked’ those accounts now, and UK Column as I understand it are now backtracking on the claims they made in their video.

Knowing only too well how this online ‘Mobbing’ works, especially in regard to how social media is being utilized to not only try and totally discredit and remove people (including genuine abuse survivors) who have been selected to work alongside the IICSA – who for whatever reason do not fulfill the ‘criteria’ demanded by this online mob, I contacted a friend of mine in order to obtain a personal statement from Mr Wolstencroft to address this once and for all.

Mr Wolstencroft kindly obliged and has given his permission for his statement to be published on the Outlaw in full:

‘I originally started Shatterboys UK to give support to those males who had been sexually abused as children, who are now adults who had no support and wanted peer support, in the hope that people could find strength and courage from identification with those who had similar life experiences and had moved forward with their lives to prove it could be done. The main focus was so people could be supported through mutual aid and empower themselves and get their lives back.

We provide one to one peer support and group support, we also campaign for change and signpost and support through the police system.

We decided to register as a company which a business lawyer did for me and spelt my name wrongly, Wolstenholm instead of Wolstencroft, he did this for me as a favour due to my lacking the necessary skills when it comes to form filling due to my dyslexia.

Companies House has been contacted about this and said it was typed incorrectly. The necessary forms have been submitted to remedy this error.

I personally have high level security clearance through the Home Office and my name is Daniel Mark Wolstencroft.

A few other people came on board to share the workload as directors and have some collective ownership of what we were doing. Over time, people either moved on or got paid jobs as Shatter Boys received no funding from any outside body, everything is voluntary. I have two other jobs which I have run Shatterboys off since we started, out of my own pocket.

The others found the pressure too much due to the issues we were dealing with, or left for personal reasons, which is not for me to share as that would be wrong.

I am effectively, the last man standing.

Shatter Boys does not even have a bank account because one of the directors had bad credit with the bank we approached to open an account.

We have received donations which has helped us to travel to see clients up and down the country and to run numerous events.

I have spent far more than what has ever come in, I give four days personally to Shatter Boys of my own time voluntarily, supporting victims, campaigning, raising awareness, telephone and email support, court support and signposting to counselling services and supporting people at meetings.

I also support family members and deliver training.

We have no premises as it was costing me too much and I have my own rent to pay and children to support.

You may be under the impression that we are a large, well-funded organisation and it may appear that way because I am proactive and get myself everywhere so it seems like there are many of us but it’s just me.

The Companies House registration was pointless and means little as it has no impact on how we work, it seemed a good idea at the time but it has caused more trouble than it’s worth, and the reason it’s getting dissolved is because there hasn’t been a letter sent in to confirm we want to stay open.

That’s down to me not putting any importance on it and being rubbish at paperwork and focusing on the important side of things which is supporting survivors.

You [UK Column] have put up a piece on your website saying that I’ve been done for fraud for a car crash, I state categorically that person is not me.

You have slandered my name publicly and defamed my character through poor research.

You’re online trolling campaign fronted by ‘Wildcat’, your No:1 researcher and your journalist ‘David’ have triggered dozens of survivors we support, and from which I’ve received numerous complaints about their behavior and there are numerous screenshots to support this.

You calling us Twa**er Boys had been taken personally by those we support and they have taken it as a personal attack on themselves as you have called them ‘Tw@#ts.’

Shatter Boys stands for breaking the silence and you have mocked them for speaking out, this has greatly upset young boys I support, family members of those who’s children have taken their own lives who have spoken out.

You have effectively silenced and re-traumatized and triggered victims through your online hate campaign. The page you have been trolling is primarily a page where survivors and family members get in touch and gather strength through our videos.

I’ve had to close the Facebook page and suspended support through you attacking those who have found the courage to finally speak out. You have made it a toxic and unsafe environment and dangerous.

You have terrified the mother of my children and she is now afraid to leave the house because of your ‘researcher’s’ trolling and creepy videos.

She is deeply worried that something may now happen to our children.

I will be closing down the company’s registration in the New Year, I haven’t updated my address on it and will not be doing so due to the amount of paedophile activity we disrupt and don’t want that made public due to people like you putting my address and birth certificate online.

You have knocked dozens of people ten steps back in their own recovery, some of which are going through the court process and God only knows how I’m going to support them to get back on track.

I will, however, carry on campaigning and pushing forward, you did not take into account my resilience when you tried to destroy my efforts.

Finally …. You have NOT run me out of the country as ‘Wildcat’ suggests, myself and another volunteer are travelling to Holland to form a CSA Task Force with other groups across Europe against Trafficking – that’s just another element of the work we do.

We will remain very proactive as we were from the beginning.’

Daniel Wolstencroft 

10th December 2017


I have always worked to the adage that the shortest distance between any two given points, is a straight line …. And the simplest explanation is very often the closest to the truth.

So with that uppermost in my mind, whenever I approach a problem or need to find the answers to a question, I tend to look for the most obvious solution which can be reached using the most direct route.

In the scientific world, however, the rule of thumb is to confuse and befuddle the non-scientific minded out there, by creating as much white noise and presenting as much gobbledygook as possible.

Fortunately, most people’s minds (and senses) do not work that way, and they can see, hear, smell, taste and touch anything that is presented to them in a simple, straightforward and honest manner with very little difficulty.

Unfortunately, they way that the world has been presented to them, and almost everything that is contained therein, is anything but simple, or straightforward and has certainly not been shown to them with anything approaching honesty.

The mainstream (controlled) history writers, the tame scientists, the mathematicians, the theologians and the established order who hold sway over them, have over many centuries, effectively hoodwinked the greater majority of humankind into believing without question, many things which are simply untrue.

One of those things is the shape of the plane upon which all of humankind exists, and the established order have gone to unimaginable lengths in order to indoctrinate the greater majority of people into believing without question, that the Earth is a Ball.

Any deviation from a steadfast belief in the Ball earth is a risky undertaking, however, and means venturing along a path littered with what can seem at times, insurmountable obstacles …. as many who have spoken publicly will already know what happens as the vicious backlash is well documented and can be observed daily on every digital media (and mainstream) platform there is.

So how would one go about approaching the subject of the Earth not being a ball to the average person?

There is one way, and it’s also the simplest, the most straightforward and undoubtably the most honest, as it demonstrates to people how they can utilise their own natural instincts and common sense, to see something that has been right in front of them all the time, and should have been all too obvious.

Thankfully, IFERS Member Del from Scotland has nailed it and demonstrates the technique perfectly in the video below, and although personally I do not believe 100% that the Earth is flat – I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt that it’s certainly NOT A BALL.

Further Reading:





The liberal mainstream media literally blew a fuse recently, and immediately went on the attack when US President Donald Trump, during a speech, made a reference to ‘what was happening in Sweden’. 

If the video below, and many, many others that have appeared online in recent weeks are true, then there is actually a great deal happening in Sweden, none of it good, and if that is the case, then it must also be apparent that the mainstream media are desperately attempting to hide the truth about what is really happening there.

And elsewhere in Europe, including the UK.


The terms ‘Conspiracy Theory’ and ‘Conspiracy Theorist’  have been appearing in the mass media more and more during the last couple of years, specifically during the run-up to the 2016 US Presidential Election, and are terms particulary favoured by left-wing liberal mouthpieces to ridicule and distract from anything that questions the prescribed narrative.

Personally, as somebody who almost always questions the official version of any story, a decent Conspiracy Theory to me is something that does need to be traced back to it’s probable source, but ONLY if I think there is any truth in the story to begin with.

I am often asked why it is that I do not pay much, if any attention to many of the Conspiracies doing the rounds on the internet at any one time, and I always give the same answer – which is that I simply do not believe it’s worth spending time on anything I feel is being purposely disseminated to distract from what is really going on.

Unfortunately, it’s also my belief that the greater majority of what has been circulated by the mass media, and has been bounced around most of the Alternative Media outlets over the last few years falls into that category, and is exactly what the mass media has been alluding to when it refers to ‘Fake News’.

That being said, one should also not be completely dismissive of what the mass media churns out on a daily basis, as there is almost always a real story being buried beneath the headlines, which can, if you are able to read between the lines, be found if you are willing to put in the effort.

History has shown us that many of the events that have been written off as being nothing more than ‘Conspiracy Theories’  by the mass media, have in fact, turned out to be true, examples of this are easily found online if keywords like; Watergate, Operation Northwoods, The Iran-Contra Affair and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and many others are entered into any decent search engine.

And of course the mass media themselves, are not above promoting Conspiracy Theories of their own in order to hoodwink the population into supporting things that there really is no public appetite for – examples of which were the shameless reporting of an imminent ‘Bird flu Epidemic’  to encourage public compliance of an aggressive vaccination programme, and who could forget the 1990 ‘Testimony of Nayirah’  where a 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die.

Her testimony, shown on all mass media outlets, helped gain public support for the 1991 Gulf War.

Despite protests in the mass media at the time that even questioning her story was itself a ‘Conspiracy Theory’, it was finally shown that her testimony was indeed, false. (It was the creation of the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for the specific purpose of promoting the Gulf War.)

Politicians themselves are also not averse to using Conspiracy Theories to negate and/or remove public opposition either, a noteable example of which, being that of Welsh Labour politician Anne Clwyd, a strong supporter of the war in Iraq, who was unsurprisingly given an easy ride when she appeared before the Chilcot Inquiry, despite being personally responsible for disseminating an uncorroborated and later totally discredited story just before a crucial Parliamentary vote on the Iraq war.

Her voice trembling with emotion, Ms Clwyd had addressed the House of Commons describing a grotesque industrial machine used by Saddam Hussein as a ‘people shredder’  into which opponents of his regime would be fed feet first, their remains then being thrown into plastic bags and used as fish food.

Without that story being imprinted into the public consciousness, the possibility will always exist that Britain as a nation would not have supported, and subsequently entered the Iraq war.

It can be difficult to ascertain what is real and what is a ‘Conspiracy Theory’  these days, mainly due to the sheer amount of (dis)information being uploaded to the internet; a great deal of which is not even worth considering in my opinion, as although the world wide web is without a doubt the greatest repository of human knowledge ever constructed, it is also the platform used by sociopaths and consummate liars, and of course by those who have the most to lose should the truth about many events, be they historical or current or sometime in the future …. emerge.

I am not going to even try and point the finger at any one group, or agency or organisation that I believe are soley responsible for being in overall ‘control’ of everything that goes on, it is not as simple as that, and there are any number of websites you can find who are only too willing to regale you with lurid tales of how the ‘Elite’, the ‘Jesuits’, the ‘Jews’, the ‘Moslems’ the ‘Zionists’, the ‘Nephilim’, the ‘Bilderbergers’ the ‘Illuminati’ a secretive ‘Knights Templar’ sect, ‘Shape-Shifting Lizards’ or even that a murderous race of ‘Grey Aliens that reside on the dark side of the Moon’ are the culprits, and it is totally the choice of the reader of those sites to decide which, if any are the true enemies of humanity ….

That is not the remit of the Outlaw, I have little time for it and I Shall leave that to others.

What I will do, and hopefully have been doing for the past four years, however, is to encourage the reader to look at what lies beyond the obvious, to question everything, and to think so far outside the box even if it becomes uncomfortable, as it’s the only way to truly separate the fact from the fiction and determine what the hell is really going on.

I also believe that in order to do that, one must first unravel specific events of the past that are demonstrably untrue, yet also seem to be as persistant in people’s beliefs today, as an antibiotic resistant infection refuses to be eradicated, resurfacing time and time again whenever a certain agenda needs to be implemented.

Some of the stories I will be looking at in 2017, will be among those that have become ingrained in so many people’s belief systems, that subsequent generations have dedicated their  entire lives  searching for proof of, and even tourist industries have been built around them, despite the fact that they are nothing more than media inventions, (and I include the Movie Industry when I refer to media in this instance) and have next to nothing in the way of proveable facts to sustain them.

Which will I believe prove interesting to some, but drive many others out of their minds ….

I originally published the following post on the 29th October 2015, and for reasons that are not relevant, nor is there a pressing need to divulge here, I opted to use the ‘Protected‘ feature, which required a password available only from myself to read the post in its entirety.

At the time of publication, a number of readers contacted me to obtain the password, on the strict understanding that nothing would be copied and shared publicly, which appears to have been the case as nothing has emerged on social media or certain blogs since its original publication, which almost certainly would have happened had it been published on an open platform.

I am only publishing it openly now, to challenge some of the many lies and deliberate fabrications that have been published about me online, by a small, but irritatingly persistent number of keyboard warriors on Twitter, and by the always charming Gojam, who publishes the ‘Needle’ blog, and the equally personable conspiracy blogger Christopher Spivey, who appears to have of late, fallen hook, line and sinker for any fiction that passes his way or, as in this particular instance, his complete failure to seek out evidence (or lack of) to reinforce any of his allegations about me, or to perform even the most basic checks on the history of his source(s).

One of the most disseminated untruths that has been inserted into the Twittersphere and the aforementioned websites about me, is the allegation that I was ‘Never in care’ so therefore I have no experience of any events that took place within the care system, to me or to anyone else, and as such have ‘No right’ to comment.

I have allowed these idiotic, and laughable claims to permeate social media, without challenging them until now, for three reasons;

  • The first being that I simply did not possess enough physical IE:DOCUMENTED evidence at the time, which I could present here to back up what after all, would simply be words on a website.
  • Secondly, to allow myself and others, time to identify those who have purposely spread those lies, and to collect the evidence of their participation in the spreading of those lies.
  • And thirdly, I am only too aware that the greater majority of people who use the Internet and use social media/blogs/forums etc, have grown ever more weary of the seemingly constant personal battles and endless bitching which is evident everyday, and therefore, have very little interest in reading about something which is of little interest to anyone not personally involved, especially as there are far more important issues that the Outlaw and other websites of its type could be addressing.

The small group behind disseminating these lies, and have been observed purposely attacking, and attempting to discredit anybody who speaks out online, about not only their own experiences of childhood brutality and abuse, but of events they have witnessed which appear to back up the claims of others, who have also spoken out.

It is the task of the legal machinery of this country to investigate, and hopefully prosecute and punish crimes against the person such as those involving the physical and sexual abuse of children, and although the said system is not perfect by any means, it’s all that victims of crime have available to them at the present time.

It is not the job of mostly anonymous and ill-equipped and mostly uninformed people on the Internet to stand as judge, jury and executioner in issues of this nature, nor have they any right to undermine, threaten and participate in the vicious attempts to discredit witnesses of what are after all, very serious criminal acts which deserve the maximum punishment that the law, as it is, permits – and knowingly interfering with that process is not only immoral, dispicable and illegal, it can also allow the guilty to go unpunished, which to the people who have been observing, appears now to be the ultimate aim.

To protect the perpetrators of appalling crimes against children, both of a historic and a current nature.

So with that in mind, what follows is the original, previously protected  post, with an addendum containing another item of documented evidence which was not available to me when the original post was published.


Like any number of people who have spent any time languishing in the UK establishment care system, I have attempted to locate my records a number of times, albeit unsuccessfully.

Many records have been destroyed or ‘mislaid‘ due to various reasons, and one event that immediately springs to mind was the unexplained fire in 1996, at a Pickfords warehouse in Lightfoot Street, Chester, where a number of care records relating to former residents of Bryn Alyn Holdings, were in long-term storage.

I myself witnessed, (from behind the relative safety of a chain-link security fence) the contents of various filing cabinets being thrown onto a large bonfire during the demolition of Glamorgan Farm School, during the mid-1990’s, which could have contained personal records, log books, accident logs etc – of any or all of the thousands of residents who had spent part of their childhoods there.

So it did happen, there is no doubt about that, and many ex-residents have spoken publicly about hitting a virtual brick wall when attempting to locate any written documentary evidence about what, after all, was an important part of their own lives – which then makes it difficult to not only ‘back up‘ their claims of any abuse or maltreatment suffered whilst in care, but also, to prove they were actually there.

An increasing number of ex-care residents, especially those who spent a greater part of their childhoods in ‘Approved or Community Schools’ and ‘Assessment Centres’ run by local authorities, and those in private hands, have related in great detail how they have been effectively silenced from speaking out, because their own experiences were not supported by official documentation.

On a personal level, up until two weeks ago, (September 2015) there was no actual physical (written) evidence of the time I spent in care apart from a number of fading photographs and a handwritten Duke of Edinburgh’s Award achievement book which are, at this time, thirty-seven years old.


Duke of Edinburgh Award Log Book and photographs.

There were four photographs initially, but one was stolen from my house in 2013, and I was unable to recover it, but nonetheless, it existed as do the others in the above image.

But again, that image is not ‘proof‘ or ‘evidence‘.

Neither are the following images, as many teenage lads, and girls, did the D of E Awards, while they were at regular High Schools and Colleges.

Glamorgan Farm School


West Glamorgan Fire Service 25/4/1980


However, the dates recorded on the images above are significant, as during the last couple of weeks, I have had a legitimate reason to apply for and receive a number of disclosures from the PNC (Police National Computer) in regard to what records the UK police hold on me.

One of the disclosures relates to an event, which has become the subject of an obsessive smear campaign on Twitter and a number of ‘Alternative Media‘ websites and forums, one of which is owned by a fairly prominent and self-styled ‘Investigative Journalist’ who has claimed to have seen evidence that ‘Jimmy Jones, was never in care and so must also be lying about anything he has experienced‘.

He has of course, never once published any ‘evidence‘ of his claims, which appears to be the common theme amongst a number of social media commentators and Alt Media bloggers, who rely entirely on their own words and personal opinions, and resort to launching personal attacks and starting smear campaigns against those who question them.

Porth Juvenile Court 11/9/1978

The disclosure above shows that I attended Porth Juvenile Court on the 11th September 1978, from where I was remanded into the care of the local authority, until 20th December, where I appeared at Cardiff Crown Court.

From September until December, I was resident at a number of Assessment Centre’s and Residential Homes in both South and North Wales, and from December 1978 until May 1979 I was at the prison at Knox Road, Cardiff, from where I was sent to Glamorgan Farm (Approved) School, where I remained for the remaining thirty months of my original sentence.

Glamorgan Farm School was of course, a local authority residential ‘Approved School’, and part of the establishment care system of this country.




Date Printed: 17-Feb-2016 @ 12:46 Page 3 of 9.


As some people may already be aware, I recently appeared in court in Mold, and was subsequently convicted of: ‘Improper use of a public telecommunication system’. I have since obtained copies of a report that was compiled, some of which I must assume was drawn from my care records, and was duly accepted by the court and was not challenged by the prosecution.

(A number of lies have also been spread online in regard to the actual events of that trial, and after seeking legal advice, I will also, in time, be addressing those untruths, and will only refer to the actual trial transcripts, as opposed to the rumour, hearsay and complete fiction that has currently been made available online.)

This report not only gives a background of the events which have taken place over the last three years, against both me and my family, and which ultimately led to my subsequent appearance in court – but also offers an outline of my ‘offending history’, which states clearly: ‘Mr Jones has an offending history, but this took place over thirty years ago. An offence of criminal damage led him to spend many years in the “care” system, spending time at various secure or semi-secure units in both Wrexham and Neath” – which corresponds and supports the above documentation of the original article.