Gojam

All posts tagged Gojam

I have purposely held back from posting anything on this site, in regard to the very recent ‘Nick,’ or Carl Beech trial and subsequent conviction, but I have, however, been watching very carefully the reactions in certain corners of the internet.

Twitter especially, has as expected, been positively brimming with activity over this case, with two distinct and very prominent echo chambers emerging, at odds with each other, the #ibelievenick stalwarts, and the other side, who have celebrated the guilty verdict (and 18-year sentence) with a glee that borders on the obscene.

For posterity, I have saved a few of the more prominent examples from both camps, and as was to be expected, those who been the most vocal in voicing their disbelief and faux horror at what they claim was a ‘stitch-up’, and ‘travesty of justice’, have historically, also been very supportive of almost every crackpot claim that has emerged on the internet over the last decade.

Their main focus of attention, however, is of course their shared belief in the alleged ‘wickedness in high places’ that needs exposing at every opportunity.

They are relentless in their pursuit of ‘justice’, and it would appear to the casual observer, that they have little interest in anything, apart from exposing child abuse and paedophilia they claim exists in every level of British Society.

But that is not strictly accurate, if one was to step back and look at the bigger picture, as most of these people, if the truth is told, have very little interest in seeking justice for genuine survivors of child abuse, nor do they care about instances of child abuse and sexual exploitation that is happening right now, throughout the length of this country.

They only cases they are interested in, are those that involve ‘Prominent People’, especially politicians and those in the public eye.

I have yet to see one of these online ‘activists’ post a single syllable in condemnation of the grooming and rape gangs that have been operating in this country, mostly under the radar for decades, and which have virtually destroyed the lives of thousands of girls, some of who, were just 11 years of age.

Nor do they show any support towards genuine survivors of child abuse, many of whom have suffered at the hands of paedophiles who are serving long prison sentences, and if what I have been witnessing is an indication, they are more inclined to attack rather than show support, to any CSA survivor, who has not named anyone on their list of approved ‘Targets’.

The Journalist Eileen Fairweather pretty much sums up what a growing number of people believe may be the reason for this.

As to Mrs Fairweather’s observation above, it should be noted that this site, was among the first to call out Mr. Beechs claims as being horseshit, and was also among the first, if not the first site that expressed doubts about the claims of Christopher Fay, and was roundly attacked by the Needleblog, and other outlets who had hosted and promoted Fay’s ludicrous claims as being ‘credible and true’.

Which begs the question as to why the Needleblog, after lying dormant for many, many months has suddenly re-emerged, (albeit without any input from Gojam) specifically to report on the Beech conviction.

It is also my belief that there are indeed groups online, which have been assembled and funded for one purpose, which is to throw up a smoke screen, and to create as much white noise as possible, to silence, distract, discredit, instil fear and cause complete chaos among genuine CSA survivors, targeting them singly or in groups.

A number of these agitators also pose as survivors of child abuse themselves, but let me reassure you, I am in contact with a number of survivors, some of whom I converse with on a daily basis, and they are appalled at the behaviour of these people, and have themselves been targeted and attacked by them, simply for voicing even the slightest doubt about the claims of Carl Beech, or Melanie Shaw, or Esther Baker or those of the Hampstead Satanic Ritual Abuse believers and pushers.

 

What I have outlined above was to be expected, however, and should come as no surprise to see any or all of the above, continuing the same way, day in, day out.

For the foreseeable future.

My only advice would be, is to totally ignore it, and hope that legislation is introduced at some point, which will make these people answerable for their claims, as well as their online behaviour, via the courts.

That being said, I will now venture a personal opinion (which is also what any or all of the above should be viewed as) of those on the ‘other side,’ many of whom appear to be commenting in a professional or a well-informed (legal) capacity, and who also co-exist within their own Twitter echo chamber, where they share each others opinions, and articles they have written, with each other.

There are four or possibly five of those, who should be considered as having a vested interest in all of this, (I am not going to name names here, as I have no desire, nor the appetite to be hauled into my local police station yet again, to defend myself against any more vexatious claims that I, or anyone who has commented here, is ‘harassing’ them) and who have published thousands upon thousands of words about the Carl Beech case, via Tweets and articles both prior to, and following Carl Beech’s conviction.

Some of these have also claimed that they are in part, responsible for the conviction of Carl Beech, which is complete nonsense, as Beech’s claims began to unravel very quickly following a BBC Panorama programme, and the due diligence shown by the Northumbria Police who thoroughly investigated the anomalies that were highlighted.

Another thing that should be considered, is that lurking right in the middle of these professional commentators, in plain sight of everyone who has been following this story, is someone who appears to have been welcomed with open arms, and viewed as a ‘credible’ source in regard to false allegations of child abuse.

He has also been very busy in his attempts to wipe every trace of his previous, and altogether vile persona from the internet, and will attack anybody who has drawn attention to it.

Fortunately, there are those who have been saving and archiving all of his past activity, and posting it back online as fast as it’s being removed.

For some reason, known only to himself, he seems to have re-invented himself as what could be described as a righteous zealot, who devotes all his time to exposing online ‘trolls,’ and those who make (what he believes are) false allegations – so would it be at all fair to ask why that would be the case?

Although it has been an inordinately long time coming, for some of us at least, the latest strand of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA), have now seen for themselves, that the claims of one Christopher Fay, and the contents of the infamous Elm Guest House ‘list’ to have been A COMPLETE AND UTTER CROCK OF SHIT of no evidential value whatsoever.

Long time readers of this site, however, will be only too aware, that the accursed list [referred to by Mary Moss as Elm Lodge and pictured above], which pretty much went viral soon after it was uploaded to the internet during 2012, being shared and heavily promoted by dozens of websites and forums and on social media, was complete claptrap.

Originally championed on the ‘TapNewsWire’ website (like the Hampstead Hoax), the list soon started appearing everywhere online, being shared like wildfire soon afterwards, to the point where it was difficult to find a website that was not publishing versions of it.

Chris Fay, on the back of this, was feted by a number of journalists, and began appearing in various mainstream publications, where he was only too willing to relate endless variations on his tales of child abuse at the hands of establishment figures, and celebrities.

There were, as I recall, very few people who were prepared to swim against the tide at that time, and when ‘An Uneasy Feeling’ was published here, on October 2013, an article which drew attention to Mr. Fay’s previous conviction, and subsequent imprisonment for money laundering – which may have had a negative effect on his credibility as witness in the future – I knew there was going to be a response.

As Mr. Fay, who within a very short time, had got his feet firmly under the table over at the now abandoned ‘Needle Blog,’ – published by the strange character ‘Gojam’, and from where his defence was mounted, via Gojam and his Operation Greenlight team – was categorically denying that the Chris Fay I was referring to, was not the same person, as both the age, and the location (Blackheath) of ‘his’ totally unconnected Chris Fay, was ‘evidence’ enough to discredit any claims to the contrary.

Other people began voicing their doubts about Fay and the list, however, which was, as it turned out, a courageous act on their part, as the attacks that were launched against this site, and me, and anyone connected to me, were rabid and venomous by that point.

Things got so poisonous, that on the 22nd of November, 2013, I was arrested by the North Wales Police, after a comment I had posted on the Needle blog, was manipulated by the site owner, or one of it’s moderators, for ‘Malicious communications.’

Was this a response to what I had highlighted about Mr. Fay’s grubby history, or did it form part of an already existing stalking campaign against my family, the perpetrator of which, had by then, formed a very close alliance with Gojam, on who’s website he regularly posted many derogatory comments about me?

That, I will never know for certain, but the connection should be noted.

Happily for me, that arrest, which ensured I was effectively silenced, (being on police bail for almost seven months)  led to no further action being taken against me, as there was zero evidence to support the accusation.

 

As things turned out, Mr. Fay himself, did finally admit that the EGH list was fake, and as Margaret Jervis rightly pointed out on Twitter, he did so on the Needle blog, although I do not think that Gojam had got the memo at that point, as he still steadfastly defended the credibility of both Fay and the list on a number of platforms, as did many people, who incidentally, are currently defending ‘Nick’, and attacking anyone who’s opinions differ from theirs.

Since that time, enough evidence has emerged to effectively discredit Mr. Fay’s testimony and the validity of that list, so the question must be asked, why has so much time and [public] money been spent on investigating it?

Wouldn’t that time and money be better spent on assisting genuine survivors of Childhood Abuse?

If you were to ask any genuine survivor of CSA, they would tell you that Chris Fay, the damned EGH list, and Fays’s later dalliances with the likes of Bill Maloney and Exaro News, has done nothing but obstruct, discombobulate, and generate both fear and distrust among survivors, and effectively label many of them, in the eyes of the general public at least, as ‘fantasists’ and compensation-chasing time wasters.

And that is unforgivable.

I shall leave you with the following, which was posted online a few years ago, which illustrates the whole thing very well.

 

‘ELM GUEST HOUSE ETC….’

“The entire Elm Guest House story was hijacked by Chris Fay & his accomplices, and very effectively so. It got the whole nation to sit up and take notice however. But it was simply, a muddying of the waters, for whatever reason….

Personally, I’d advise anyone getting involved with ‘campaigning’ politicians to use them as they use each other – ruthlessly & calculatingly. They chew each other up & spit each other out as they grapple for the next rung on the ladder.

We should do the same with them – use them for our own ends & discard them without a second thought the second they cease to be useful to us. It sounds harsh, and I wouldn’t do it in the real world with real people, but they are Politicans after all, barely even human!

The Elm Guest House thing was – from the beginning – David Hencke, Tom Watson MP and Exaro News. An experienced political journalist, an ambitious politician, and a new investigative media group trying to make names for themselves. With a few desperate bloggers being tossed initially tasty, yet deliberately misleading tidbits every now and then (C.H.E/C.G.H.E) to make them feel they were a part of some great, yet ever so secret media/government conspiracy.

Gojam/Needleblog and the Icke Forums are the obvious choices here.

I don’t really care if Exaro News is a left-leaning site/group, I don’t even care that Tom Watson is a Labour MP. All I can see is three reputations that are going to rest entirely on the outcome of what they themselves brought to the attention of the nation. They can look forward to a lifetime of explaining themselves if it all ends in nothing. They’ve made mistakes along the way… and I’m not sure they still aren’t doing so.

But bearing in mind that they are somewhat limited in the language they can use (being ‘professionals’, not foul-mouthed internet hot-heads like us!) they have, between them, very efficiently discredited Ben Fellows, Chris Fay & Bill Maloney among others.

When Tom Watson stated that the photograph talked about by Chris Fay (with Bill Maloney incidentally) does not, in his opinion, exist, I take that as a pretty clear message. When Exaro talked about a vulnerable witness being manipulated & having ludicrous words put in his mouth (again, by Fay & Maloney) I take that as a pretty clear message too!

But it’s a real shame that they didn’t see it earlier.

I tried explaining in a post on the David Icke Forum what I thought might have happened, and how a floundering investigation maybe had no choice but to accept the ‘help’ of legions of online bullshitters who may have had useful information, but purposely mixed it up with utter garbage to confound anyone searching for the truth….

(inadvertently, possibly… although I personally doubt this).

Who knows?

I doubt very much we’ll ever really learn what really went on.

I would dearly love to see some prosecutions come out of this for attempting to pervert the course of justice (if what I suspect is correct), but when the ‘perverting’ is being done for the benefit of the Establishment, that looks like a real long-shot.

Turkeys voting for Christmas, and all that…

Meanwhile, I also note that neither Edwina Curry nor Norman Tebbit (for example) have been called to account for their actions.

The internet nutters would have probably had more success focusing their attention and combined amateur investigating skills on something like that: eminently provable, tangible & totally unforgivable behaviour by people who – at the very least – deserve to be unmasked for the whole world to see.

But it appears that they would prefer to continually post shite like child-pornography being smuggled into/out of Turkey inside pork-products (’cause it’s a Muslim-country & the customs inspectors wouldn’t want to touch it!)…

Yet another masterpiece from the brain of Sweetcheeks (who is closely linked to Tajasfire, Discovery77 & others who slither around the Icke Forum, all the way down the line to where Chris Fay & his cohorts await).

It’s becoming increasingly harder to believe that any of these ‘people’ have a genuine interest in seeing justice being done…

After all, what other reason would they have to spend so much time online if the truth came out ?

P.S. I Forgot to mention that Sabine McNeill woman… I’m not even going there!

I remember watching some sort of video of a mad PowerPoint presentation that she gave inside (I think) the Houses of Parliament.

Utterly bizarre.

Maybe she is a total genius & is functioning on a higher-level than myself, or indeed anyone else, but it just looked like meaningless rubbish!

My bullshit-alert was activated however… But that’s another story entirely.”

 

Almost as soon as the news broke that a Malaysian airliner had crashed in eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 people on board, rumours began circulating that the jet had been shot down amid the fighting taking place between pro-Moscow separatists and the Ukrainian military near the Russian border.

The Mainstream Media are of course leading the charge, placing the blame firmly on the shoulders of Vladimir Putin and Russia.

The diplomatic blame game has already started, with harsh sanctions being proposed against Russia, and of course the Conspiracy machine has been working on overdrive.

Everybody has an opinion it seems, some bloggers, not wishing to be left behind, have even taken a rare excursion from their remit to report every piece of gossip regarding historic Child abuse, to weigh in with their own Mainstream Media-inspired point of view.

It’s highly unlikely that the distinct lack of anything resembling a shred of actual evidence, will have any bearing on their views I shouldn’t think.

Once again we have to look to history to establish that this is not even an isolated incident, this isn’t the first time a civilian airliner has ‘crashed’ near a war zone, nor is it the first time that hundreds of innocent civilians have been slaughtered to deflect the eyes of the world from something happening elsewhere.

Iran Air Flight 655

On July 3, 1988, the USS Vincennes destroyed an Iranian Airbus A300 that was on its way from Bandar Abbas to Dubai. Nearly 300 people, most of whom were Iranian and on their way to Mecca – were killed in the crash, including 66 children.

The incident traced its roots back to the 1979 Islamic revolution and Iraq’s subsequent invasion of Iran. The US backed Iraq in that conflict, which lasted for 8 years. The day the Vincennes brought down the airliner, it had been in a firefight with Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf. Those onboard mistook Flight 655 for an enemy F-14 fighter jet, fired two surface-to-air missiles at it, and killed all 290 people onboard. Four years after the crash, the US government admitted the Vincennes was in Iranian water during the exchange of fire.

Siberian Airlines flight to Novosibirsk

On October 4, 2001, the Ukrainian military was conducting its largest combined land, sea and air exercise to date when it accidentally targeted a Siberian Airlines flight on its way from Tel Aviv to Novosibirsk. The Tupolev Tu-154, which was carrying 78 people, was flying at 35,000 feet near the coast of Russia when a surface-to-air missile launched at a drone exploded about 50 feet above the aircraft, raining down shrapnel across the entire length of the fuselage. The captain and navigator on the flight were reportedly killed instantly. The jet crashed into the Black Sea, killing all onboard.

Korean Air Flight 007

A Soviet fighter jet shot down Korean Air Flight 007 as it made its way from Anchorage, Alaska to Seoul, Korea in September of 1983. The crew had switched on the autopilot, but they drifted into Soviet airspace at a time when Cold War tensions were running high. In March, President Ronald Reagan had called the Soviets an “evil empire,” and a few weeks later the government announced it would be developing a missile defense shield called Star Wars. And US spy planes — Boeing RC-135s, which looked very similar to civilian airliners — had been patrolling the Pacific. So, when Flight 007 veered 200 miles off course, the Soviets scrambled two Sukhoi Su-15 fighter jets to intercept it.

Years after the incident, Soviet pilot Col. Gennadi Osipovitch told CNN that he tried signaling the aircraft’s pilot by firing tracers, but didn’t receive a response. The Soviets never tried contacting the passenger jet by radio, a failure that was later rebuked by the International Civil Aviation Organization, before firing the missile that brought it down near the coast of Sakhalin, killing all 269 people onboard including a US congressman from Georgia.

Libyan Airlines Flight 114

On Feb. 21, 1973, Flight 114 took off from Tripoli, Libya and set its course for Cairo. Due to severe weather and malfunctioning equipment, the airliner veered into the Israeli-controlled airspace over the Sinai Peninsula. Israeli fighters signaled to the aircraft that it needed to land, but the Libyan pilots declined and were shot down. More than 100 people were killed, but one of the co-pilots survived.

Flight data indicated the pilots believed they were in Egyptian airspace.

GLOBALPOST

“In the stage play and suspense thriller from the 1930s entitled “Gas Light,” a conniving husband tries to make the wife he wishes to get rid of think she is losing her mind by making subtle changes in her environment, including slowly and steadily dimming the flame on a gas lamp. In recent years, the term “gaslighting” has come to be applied to attempts by certain kinds of personalities, especially psychopaths and narcissists, who are among the personalities most adept at sophisticated tactics of manipulation, to create so much doubt in the minds of their targets of exploitation that the victim no longer trusts their own judgment about things and buys into the assertions of the manipulator, thus coming under their power and control”.

For the purpose of this article I believe a version of this technique is now being used online as a type of experiment in social control.

And the focus of these attacks are survivors of childhood abuse.

The easiest way of describing it is “how far can you push people, or what can you make them do”?

They closely watch the effects on those they target and keep endlessly repeating whatever method that achieves the best result.

Effective ‘Gaslighting’ can be accomplished in several different ways.

So here is how it works and what you need to watch out for.

A random person can assert something to or about you with such conviction that you start to doubt your own perspectives.

Using vigorous and unwavering denial alongside public displays of righteous indignation can also achieve the same result.

They may use known facts about you that seem accurate but contain minute, hard to prove distortions and use them to their advantage.

It is particularly effective used alongside other tactics such as publicly shaming and bringing on feelings of intense guilt.

Anything that assists in getting another person to doubt their own judgement and back down will work.

It is only one of the many weapons in the arsenal of people who are hell-bent on getting the result they want, even if it means doing so by very subtle and covert means.

They will do whatever it takes to secure and maintain a position of advantage over their ‘targets’.

The concentrate on aspects of your personal life by using information that you have unwittingly provided to them as they have probably saved every Tweet, Forum post and comment that you have made online.

From this they use certain facts and highlight anything that they think will get the strongest reaction. For example if you have innocently written or commented on the Benefit changes, they will direct comments that are normally used by the media to describe the unemployed in a negative way.

If you are ill, or have a disability, they will focus on this and use the most cruel words in order to anger, humiliate or cause you distress.

In my case they have focused on the fact that as a 14-year old boy I was taken to secure facility to be psychologically assessed. Regardless of the other facts, which were it was illegal, and that I received a clean bill of mental health, they still see that as a lever to get a reaction from me.

gojam

Gojam, who writes the Needle blog for example, has tweeted that fact several times to his followers with the sole intention of trying to cast doubts upon, and discredit anything I say.

Another Twitter user has used the same information, to write a blog about how she and her daughter are now living in fear of their lives as she has been fed information that I am ‘Stalking’ her and taking photographs of her child.

Some of the most effective means at their disposal are tactics that conceal their real intent while simultaneously prompting their “target” to submit to their will.

Deception is often the key ingredient in manipulation.

Deception can be accomplished by outright denial, distortion of key aspects of events, and a variety of other methods, especially very sophisticated lying techniques.

Really accomplished liars can deceive you by merely reciting a catalogue of absolute facts, while deliberately and cleverly leaving out one or two crucial elements that would change the entire character of what they’re trying to make you believe.

A common element among all the tactics manipulators use is that they cause the person being targeted to doubt their own instincts about what’s going on.

Their gut tells them they’re under attack or that someone is trying to get the better of them, and they instantly go on the defensive.

But because they often can’t find any clear evidence that the other person is actually doing this, they start doubting and questioning themselves.

This is the real secret of effective manipulation.

If their “target” was solidly convinced they were in the process of being attacked they would be more likely to put up more resistance instead of capitulating.

The Manipulators know this.

They win by getting the other person to back down or give in.

Gaslighting has come to some prominence lately because several authors have highlighted it as one of the more crafty tactics psychopaths use to disadvantage their victims.

Many of these disturbed individuals, especially the aggressive personalities, are prone to using numerous tactics, including covert techniques, to get the better of their targets.

Their goal is always to win or secure whatever it is they want.

And they’ll do whatever they have to do to get it.

Sometimes the most effective way to do that is to avoid bringing attention to their intentions but rather get the other person to unwittingly but voluntarily surrender.

If you can install shame, guilt, fear, or great doubt, the other person will more than likely back off any stance they wanted to take.