Election

All posts tagged Election

The campaign leading up to the 2019 General Election, or as many people view it, the ‘Brexit Election,’ has been one of the most vicious, propaganda-filled, mistruth littered, and ultimately damaging, this country has witnessed in living memory.

Every one of the main political parties have lied, to varying degrees, and have mislead the electorate on a number of important issues, but by far the most pernicious, (and grossly inaccurate) claim, made by Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, is that Boris Johnson and the Conservative and Unionist Party, are ‘going to sell the InterNational Health Service to Donald Trump and the Americans’.

This claim was wholly predictable, however, and the Labour Party’s election campaign has focussed upon, and revolved entirely around this one issue, and it appears to be the only thing they have been able to effectively weaponise.

Your NHS.

On the surface, this untested, and unsubstantiated claim has had a remarkable effect, inasmuch as if more floating voters decide to fall for it, this country could be heading towards a hung parliament; which could mean that the hard-left socialists Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, could obtain the keys to Downing Street, if, and only if, they are supported by an unholy alliance comprising of the Liberal Democrats, The Green Party, and the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists.

Which would, in the light of day, also mean at least four more years of public confusion, electoral chaos, in all possibility the economy crashing,  Brexit being put on hold, or scrapped altogether, which spits in the face of 17.4 Million of the electorate, and years more hardship and misery for millions of people who can least endure it.

So with that in mind, I would like to share the following video with you.

A video which, in my opinion, demolishes Jeremy Corbyn’s claim about the NHS entirely, and should, at the very least, make any person who cares about the truth, (and has grown sick and tired of the sheer arrogance and patronising attitudes shown to them by the current crop of politicians) think long and hard about who they really want – and ultimately trust – to take this once great country forward.

As far as I am aware, during political party Leadership Elections and General Elections – the democratic process allows for one vote per person only.

Local elections may be different, but that being said, there may be a perfectly logical explanation for the following claims that were spotted on Twitter.

It could also be said that it offers an explanation for the unprecedented and wholly unexpected surge in the Labour Party vote during the 2017 General Election.

The people of France have just voted for their own destruction.

The people of France have just voted for a hand-picked, liberal globalist over the Nationalist candidate Marine Le Pen.

The people of France have just voted for open borders, for even greater Islamification of their once beautiful country, and they have voted to prop up a rapidly imploding European Union.

Adieu France, Vous Alex Terminé ….

In the event that the mass media fail to mention this, the names of the Conservative Members of Parliament who are believed to be currently under police investigation for fraud during the last General Election – are as follows:

It has been speculated that attempting to bury this information may be one of the reasons that PM Teresa May has called for the snap election in June.

And is only the tip of what may turn out to be a very large iceberg.

Despite the piss poor, laughably weak and disorganised alternatives that are on offer at this time, a landslide victory for Teresa May will hand the Conservative Party absolute power – which for a self-serving political party like the Tories, would mean that this country at the least, would become little more than a money laundering operation for wealthy Conservative donors.

They are not known as the ‘Nasty Party’ for nothing, and it would be wise to remember that when you cast your vote.

Regardless of your political preference, the only sensible choice come June the 8th, should be one of supporting the candidate that stands the best chance of stopping the Tories.

As the US election approaches the finishing line, the blatantly left-wing and Hillary Clinton supporting HUFFINGTON POST, have published an article alleging that the final campaign ad put out by Republican Candidate Donald Trump has ‘Anti Semitic Overtones’

“The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election,” the GOP presidential nominee warns in the two-minute video. “For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the global special interests, they partner with these people that don’t have your good in mind.”

As Trump says “levers of power in Washington,” we see footage of George Soros, a billionaire investor and philanthropist. And when Trump says, “global special interests,” Federal Reserve chairwoman Janet Yellen appears on screen.

Both Soros and Yellen are Jewish.

So what exactly are the Huff Post alluding to in their article?

That Donald Trump really is an ‘Anti-Semite’ and should not get your vote, or God forbid, actually win the Presidency based on that assumption?

Or are they saying that ‘Those who really control the power in Washington’ and the ‘global special interests’ and those ‘who don’t have the American people’s good in mind’ …. are in fact Jewish?

I am busy at the minute with a number of projects unrelated to this site, a book collaboration and some fairly intensive French nobility bloodline research, which is taking much longer than I initially thought as these things often do.

However, I have been keeping a watchful eye on some events that are currently unfolding both here in Blighty and across the pond, and happened upon a thread on a political forum in the US – which has made a prediction which piqued my interest somewhat.

If you are at all interested in the upcoming race to the White House, which it appears a large number of the readers of this site are, going by the number of emails I receive, the screen capped image below certainly gives food for thought, inasmuch as the kind of tactics that may (or not) come into play if the Clinton Campaign is seen to be faltering.

It may not happen of course, but if it does, it will show beyond a reasonable doubt how political campaigns are rigged every which way but loose, and this is only one tactic that may (or not) get the Democrats (and the Clinton’s) back into the White House and all that that entails.

You should have already guessed by now that Donald Trump has no real intention of becoming POTUS, he never did, his role is simply to ensure the Clintons return to the seat of power by decimating the Republicans vote.

I am not saying that this is what is going to happen, but please do not be surprised (or fooled into believing) if this, or a scenario very similar in nature plays out prior to the polls opening Stateside.

 

Clinton

I have been meaning to write about this for a while, and even though the story has been out there before in various forms, recent events in this country have made it worthy of a second look.

Certain names have been making the headlines of late, for different reasons I grant you, but it does highlight the fact that the same people always seem to be ‘in the thick of it.’

Following the 1997 General Election, Anthony Charles Lynton Blair had entered Downing Street after a landslide victory for his Rebadged ‘New’ Labour Party.

He quickly learned that he had become custodian of some very sordid under the table deals that had been struck during the Thatcher/Major era.

These deals had been struck during a sanction busting trip to South Africa, by our current Prime Minister, David Cameron, the details of which, even today continue to cause panic around the world and are a conspiracy theorists dream.

South Africa was still under the Apartheid regime in 1989, Nelson Mandela was still imprisoned on Robben Island, but that mattered little to the rising star of the Conservative Research Department, who jumped at the chance of taking an all-expenses paid trip to impress his mentor Margaret Thatcher.

I guess he may have seen it as chance to ‘see for himself’ the inner workings of this country, after all, the funding was already in place having been donated by a firm that heavily lobbied against the impositions of the sanctions.

What was not revealed about this trip though, (where he was accompanied by Sir Keith Warren) was it’s real purpose, which was to purchase three of the ten highly illegal nuclear weapons that had been built by the RSA & Israel.

After the deal was struck, the nukes were then shipped to Oman, where oddly, they were stored in an insecure compound ready for possible deployment against Iraq during the early stages of any conflict.

This highly fraudulent deal not only misused Taxpayers money, but also served to swell the Tory Party Election Fund by a not unsubstantial £17.8 million, which was never accounted for.

It was widely believed that these weapons did in fact, turn up sometime later in Iraq and that may have been the real reason that Blair took this country to war, as he had been made acutely aware of the ‘Deal’ after taking office.

What was not so well known, was that these very mobile weapons, were small enough to be transported by road into Syria aboard separate ambulances, of all things, and were then stolen by the same arms dealer that they were initially purchased from and then re-sold on the black market.

*It is an open secret that one was successfully test fired by North Korea in 2009.*

David Cameron was a young research officer at this time, I do not believe that he possessed the ability to have brokered this deal by himself, as after all, his very presence in South Africa at that time violated international law. It also violated the international law on dealing with nuclear weapons that are not even known to exist, according to the UN.

He was ably assisted by the aforementioned Sir Keith Warren and David Wilshire, (with full US approval) and it has been suggested that other high profile key figures were involved.

They may have been the then head of the DTI Peter Lilley, Lord Alistair McAlpine who, if memory serves was the Tory Party Treasurer, and even the shady arms dealer himself John Bredenkamp.

Others figures possibly involved must include John Major, Ken Clarke, Sir Mark Thatcher and notable others within the British Government.

This deal had involved more than 52 million pounds of British taxpayers money, of which, some 17.8 million pounds had been creamed off and given to the Conservative Party Election Fund to pay off a ‘loan.’

To this day it has never been investigated, despite questions being raised in the House of Commons.

(If you have trouble believing this…… It’s an simple matter to check it for yourself as it is available in Hansard 22nd of June 1993, and starting at Col. 197 when Lord Doug Hoyle raised the issue in the House).

We should also consider the position of Dr. David Kelly in this deal, who died simply because he knew too much, having been personally responsible for receiving these weapons for and on behalf of the British Government.

If one can justify going to war on only an assumption, when others knew much more than was first reported, then we almost certainly went to war with the wrong country.

As a result of this cover-up, over one million Iraq’s have been killed, as well as many British & American soldiers, and it should also be noted that the US and UK governments, have totally contaminated Iraq to saturation point for many generations to come.

The same can be said for the current war in Afghanistan which was also totally orchestrated by the US and UK governments.