All posts tagged Conspiracy

I have been watching with interest, the online insanity surrounding the one-time East17 vocalist Brian Harvey, but have, until now, not allowed myself to be dragged into any of it.

This will be my only contribution, and it comes by way of offering some timely advice.

My advice to Brian Harvey, would be to ignore all of the self-titled ‘Targeted Individuals’, and those who have attached themselves to him in order to boost their own Youtube Channels & social media presence – and also to ignore the detractors and those who he describes as ‘trolls’ – and to concentrate on the bigger picture.

I would then ask him to take some time out (37:02 minutes in real time), and watch the following videos, which will I believe, furnish him with everything he would need to answer most of the questions he has been asking, especially in regard to how he ended up in his current situation.

They explain, in simple terms, not only why, but how it was done, and most importantly, by whom.

Putting all personal feelings aside, as I don’t really care whether Brian Harvey likes me, or trusts my judgement, as it’s unimportant in the greater scheme of things.

What is important, however, is that the truth is not allowed to be bypassed by the endless back and forth between various parties and online groups, and to cut through the white noise that has effectively drowned out any attempt at reasoned discussion, and forge a positive way forward.

These videos were put together by someone who’s work I am aware of via his blog and his Youtube channel, but that is as far as any association between us goes.

It is my belief that Brian Harvey was not only set up, (as the videos clearly show), but he was also both professionally and socially crucified by people within the British political establishment, working towards a pre-determined agenda, assisted by his manager and willingly abetted by the mainstream media.

It’s now up to the reader/viewer to decide for themselves where the truth lies.

The terms ‘Conspiracy Theory’ and ‘Conspiracy Theorist’  have been appearing in the mass media more and more during the last couple of years, specifically during the run-up to the 2016 US Presidential Election, and are terms particulary favoured by left-wing liberal mouthpieces to ridicule and distract from anything that questions the prescribed narrative.

Personally, as somebody who almost always questions the official version of any story, a decent Conspiracy Theory to me is something that does need to be traced back to it’s probable source, but ONLY if I think there is any truth in the story to begin with.

I am often asked why it is that I do not pay much, if any attention to many of the Conspiracies doing the rounds on the internet at any one time, and I always give the same answer – which is that I simply do not believe it’s worth spending time on anything I feel is being purposely disseminated to distract from what is really going on.

Unfortunately, it’s also my belief that the greater majority of what has been circulated by the mass media, and has been bounced around most of the Alternative Media outlets over the last few years falls into that category, and is exactly what the mass media has been alluding to when it refers to ‘Fake News’.

That being said, one should also not be completely dismissive of what the mass media churns out on a daily basis, as there is almost always a real story being buried beneath the headlines, which can, if you are able to read between the lines, be found if you are willing to put in the effort.

History has shown us that many of the events that have been written off as being nothing more than ‘Conspiracy Theories’  by the mass media, have in fact, turned out to be true, examples of this are easily found online if keywords like; Watergate, Operation Northwoods, The Iran-Contra Affair and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and many others are entered into any decent search engine.

And of course the mass media themselves, are not above promoting Conspiracy Theories of their own in order to hoodwink the population into supporting things that there really is no public appetite for – examples of which were the shameless reporting of an imminent ‘Bird flu Epidemic’  to encourage public compliance of an aggressive vaccination programme, and who could forget the 1990 ‘Testimony of Nayirah’  where a 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die.

Her testimony, shown on all mass media outlets, helped gain public support for the 1991 Gulf War.

Despite protests in the mass media at the time that even questioning her story was itself a ‘Conspiracy Theory’, it was finally shown that her testimony was indeed, false. (It was the creation of the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton for the specific purpose of promoting the Gulf War.)

Politicians themselves are also not averse to using Conspiracy Theories to negate and/or remove public opposition either, a noteable example of which, being that of Welsh Labour politician Anne Clwyd, a strong supporter of the war in Iraq, who was unsurprisingly given an easy ride when she appeared before the Chilcot Inquiry, despite being personally responsible for disseminating an uncorroborated and later totally discredited story just before a crucial Parliamentary vote on the Iraq war.

Her voice trembling with emotion, Ms Clwyd had addressed the House of Commons describing a grotesque industrial machine used by Saddam Hussein as a ‘people shredder’  into which opponents of his regime would be fed feet first, their remains then being thrown into plastic bags and used as fish food.

Without that story being imprinted into the public consciousness, the possibility will always exist that Britain as a nation would not have supported, and subsequently entered the Iraq war.

It can be difficult to ascertain what is real and what is a ‘Conspiracy Theory’  these days, mainly due to the sheer amount of (dis)information being uploaded to the internet; a great deal of which is not even worth considering in my opinion, as although the world wide web is without a doubt the greatest repository of human knowledge ever constructed, it is also the platform used by sociopaths and consummate liars, and of course by those who have the most to lose should the truth about many events, be they historical or current or sometime in the future …. emerge.

I am not going to even try and point the finger at any one group, or agency or organisation that I believe are soley responsible for being in overall ‘control’ of everything that goes on, it is not as simple as that, and there are any number of websites you can find who are only too willing to regale you with lurid tales of how the ‘Elite’, the ‘Jesuits’, the ‘Jews’, the ‘Moslems’ the ‘Zionists’, the ‘Nephilim’, the ‘Bilderbergers’ the ‘Illuminati’ a secretive ‘Knights Templar’ sect, ‘Shape-Shifting Lizards’ or even that a murderous race of ‘Grey Aliens that reside on the dark side of the Moon’ are the culprits, and it is totally the choice of the reader of those sites to decide which, if any are the true enemies of humanity ….

That is not the remit of the Outlaw, I have little time for it and I Shall leave that to others.

What I will do, and hopefully have been doing for the past four years, however, is to encourage the reader to look at what lies beyond the obvious, to question everything, and to think so far outside the box even if it becomes uncomfortable, as it’s the only way to truly separate the fact from the fiction and determine what the hell is really going on.

I also believe that in order to do that, one must first unravel specific events of the past that are demonstrably untrue, yet also seem to be as persistant in people’s beliefs today, as an antibiotic resistant infection refuses to be eradicated, resurfacing time and time again whenever a certain agenda needs to be implemented.

Some of the stories I will be looking at in 2017, will be among those that have become ingrained in so many people’s belief systems, that subsequent generations have dedicated their  entire lives  searching for proof of, and even tourist industries have been built around them, despite the fact that they are nothing more than media inventions, (and I include the Movie Industry when I refer to media in this instance) and have next to nothing in the way of proveable facts to sustain them.

Which will I believe prove interesting to some, but drive many others out of their minds ….

As of yesterday, there has been a ‘Toxic Smog Alert’ in force in North Wales.

The local media has warned: ‘Air pollution levels set to rise with hot spell’ and are advising  people to ‘stay indoors wherever possible and keep Windows and doors closed‘.

The Daily Post has been ever so helpful and published an article yesterday about a ‘Mystery aircraft circling over North Wales’ which a large number of people reported to the newspaper’s Facebook page, inviting readers to leave comments on what they thought about the “Chemtrail Conspiracy Theory”

Living in North Wales, it is not difficult to spot that the skies have been particularly ‘Heavy‘, over the last few days, and only a complete idiot could fail to spot the amount of trails criss-crossing the sky as being anything but normal.

I took these photographs yesterday when the skies were relatively clear above Wrexham.


And this was taken first thing this morning.


It is now becoming increasingly difficult to ignore the simple fact, that whenever the skies are full of these ‘Trails’, a large number of people suffer with respiratory problems and other associated ailments.

You can actually taste the difference in the air around here today, and whatever your views or belief/nonbelief in the existence of  ‘Chemtrails‘, or that ‘Geoengineering‘ is being undertaken above your heads right now – can you still deny that something is very wrong here?

And it hasn’t been ‘right’ for a long time….


On 28 April 2015, WORLD DAILY NEWS REPORT published an article titled “David Rockefeller’s Sixth Heart Transplant Successful at Age 99” that reported the billionaire had just undergone his sixth heart transplant.

As Rockefeller Senior is widely believed to have the O Rhesus Negative Bloodtype, this news would have been of great interest to anyone with Rhesus Negative blood – if the story had been true that is.

I have recently discovered that there is zero actual evidence that David Rockefeller got even a single heart transplant, let alone received six of them.

There is not a single credible source for any of this – apart from a single article published on the satirical website “World News Daily Record” which certainly doesn’t qualify as credible in any sense of the word.

The fact that Rockefeller is almost 100 years old, also makes this claim completely ridiculous.

He may be fabulously wealthy and easily able to afford a team of personal surgeons to perform the surgery, and even, if need be, finance a team of assassins to target people in order to harvest their healthy hearts – which is one of the more bizarre claims doing the rounds on a few conspiracy websites and forums.

Look at it logically, people in the prime of life need a great deal of luck to survive a heart transplant, and even attempting such a procedure at the ripe old age of 99 would equate to suicide, no matter how healthy he is, how wealthy he is, or how experienced and dedicated his alleged team of private surgeons are.

(Heart surgeons, incidentally, can earn a lot of money and gain a lot of prestige the world over by doing perfectly legitimate work.)

But if David Rockefeller really needed a sixth heart transplant as has been alluded to, he would be as far away from “healthy” – as any person can possibly get.

Receiving a donor heart isn’t some kind of miracle cure, nor will it grant eternal youth to the recipient – in fact, the opposite is true.

People have undergone multiple organ transplants of course, sometimes with minimal waiting times, but many others die after waiting patiently for years, without ever getting a call that a suitable donor heart has become available.

This can seem cruel and some would say decidedly unfair, but it has nothing to do with money, power or influence.

It is down to lady luck, the country/location you are in, statistics and donor availability/compatibility.

Having a rare blood type as Rockefeller is believed to have, or a chronic heart condition which merits multiple transplants, is something no amount of money can change, nor does ones immune system care about your net worth.

A donor’s immune markers or any anatomical irregularities are also facts which should be considered, and again, are something that are not subject to change – however much money a person is able to throw at them.

Most waiting lists for transplant organs aren’t ordered by waiting time anymore I believe, first and foremost, they are ordered by how urgent they happen to be.

So if anyone’s freshly transplanted heart gets rejected and they are languishing in an Intensive Care Unit somewhere in the world, and are being kept alive by life support systems – they will probably be top of the list for that reason alone.

The sixth in a series of articles which recognises real-life Outlaw Heroes

Thomas Spence: The Poor Man’s Revolutionary

Thomas Spence (1750 – 1814) was an English Radical and advocate of the common ownership of land.

He was born in Newcastle-on-Tyne, the son of a Scottish net and shoe maker.

He was one of the leading English revolutionaries of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.

He was born into poverty and unfortunately died the same way, after long periods of imprisonment, in 1814.

The threatened enclosure of the Town Moor in Newcastle in 1771 appears to have been what sparked Spence’s interest in the land question and his own journey towards ultra-radicalism.

His scheme was not for land Nationalistion but for the establishment of self-contained parochial communities, in which rent paid to the parish (wherein the absolute ownership of the land was vested) should be the only tax of any kind.

His ideas and thinking on the subject were shaped by a variety of economic thinkers, including his friend Charles Hall.

At the centre of Spence’s work was his Plan, known as ‘Spence’s Plan’.

His Plan had a number of features, including:

“The end of aristocracy and landlords;
All land should be publicly owned by ‘democratic parishes’, which should be largely self-governing;
Rents of land in parishes to be shared equally amongst parishioners;
Universal suffrage (including female suffrage) at both parish level and through a system of deputies elected by parishes to a national senate;
A ‘social guarantee’ extended to provide income for those unable to work;
The ‘rights of infants’ to be free from abuse and poverty”.

Spence’s Plan was first published in his penny pamphlet ‘Property in Land Every One’s Right’ in 1775.

It was re-issued as ‘The Real Rights of Man’ in later editions. It was also reissued by, amongst others, Henry Hyndman under the title ‘The Nationalization of the Land’ in 1795 and 1882.

Spence may have been the first Englishman to speak of ‘The rights of man’.

The following recollection, composed in the third person, was written by Spence while he was in prison in London in 1794 on a charge of High Treason.

Spence was, he wrote:

“The first, who as far as he knows, made use of the phrase “RIGHTS OF MAN”, which was on the following remarkable occasion: A man who had been a farmer, and also a miner, and who had been ill-used by his landlords, dug a cave for himself by the seaside, at Marsdon Rocks, between Shields and Sunderland, about the year 1780, and the singularity of such a habitation, exciting the curiosity of many to pay him a visit; our author was one of that number. Exulting in the idea of a human being, who had bravely emancipated himself from the iron fangs of aristocracy, to live free from impost, he wrote extempore with chaulk above the fire place of this free man, the following lines:
Ye landlords vile, whose man’s peace mar,
Come levy rents here if you can;
Your stewards and lawyers I defy,
And live with all the RIGHTS OF MAN”

Spence left Newcastle for London in 1787.

He kept a small book-stall in High Holborn.

In 1794 he spent seven months in Newgate Gaol on a charge of High Treason, and in 1801, was sentenced to twelve months’ imprisonment for seditious libel.

He died in London on the 8th of September 1814.

His many admirers formed a “Society of Spencean Philanthropists,” of which some account is given in Harriet Martineau’s ‘England During the Thirty Years’ Peace.’

The African Caribbean activists William Davidson and Robert Wedderburn were drawn to this political group. The Society of Spencean Philanthropists (including Arthur Thistlewood) were involved in The Cato Street Conspiracy of 1820.

Spence explored his political and social concepts in a series of books about the fictional Utopian state of Spensonia.


Spence was a self-taught radical with a deep regard for education as a means to liberation. He pioneered a phonetic script and pronunciation system designed to allow people to learn reading and pronunciation at the same time. He believed that if the correct pronunciation was visible in the spelling, everyone would pronounce English correctly, and the class distinctions carried by language would cease.

This he believed, would bring a time of equality, peace and plenty.

He published the first English dictionary with pronunciations (1775) and made phonetic versions of many of his pamphlets.

Spence’s angry defense of the rights of children has lost little of its potency even today, and when his ‘The Rights of Infants’ was published in 1796 it was viewed by many as being way ahead of its time.


“Bullshit is bullshit, it just goes by different names” – Paul Weller

The Alternative Media has, in it’s wake, spawned a slew of ‘Truth Warriors’, and the nauseatingly self-titled ‘Truth Soldiers,’ who appear to have sprung up from nowhere, all claiming to promote the ‘real truth’ or what they claim to be the truth, and their numbers are increasing every day.

It is difficult to avoid seeing these truther types as they appear to be everywhere now, each in turn, ranting about the latest ‘Conspiracy’ that happens to be popular, and each and every one of them adding their own individual spin on things that are common knowledge to anyone who is even slightly awake.

Some even try to persuade the reader that many of these latest conspiracy theories doing the rounds, are new, and are something they have personally uncovered.

I can assure you they are not, and they haven’t.

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, many bogus, deeply sinister and secretive plots have been allowed to emerge – some are genuine, although the majority are completely false, and it should not come as a surprise to learn that almost all of them have emanated from the same sources.

Many of these conspiracy theories are not as a rule produced by the ordinary man or woman on the street, however wide awake they are or claim to be.

They originate from deep within the establishment, and are then cultivated by those who work within that framework – before being fed to the civil servants, university thinktanks and certain mainstream media outlets, which are then in turn, drip fed to the population at appropriate times.

9/11, 7/7, The Woolwich Debacle, Sandy Hook, The Boston Bombings, The Hollie Grieg Story, The Madeline McCann ‘Abduction’, ISIS, #paedobritain and the sudden epidemic of parliamentary and celebrity sexual abuse allegations, are all recent examples of how selected information was being introduced to the population.

There are hundreds upon hundreds of paid websites, freely-hosted blogs and anonymous identities on social media, that have been specifically set up to both promote, and disseminate every aspect of any or all of these subjects – and hundreds more besides – which in turn, has kept the reader or researcher continually chasing shadows, playing catch-up and remaining in a perpetual state of confusion.

Fortunately, the charlatans, snake-oil salesmen and disinformation spreaders within the truth movement and the so-called ‘Alternative Media’ are easy to identify.

Very little of what they say or write is original, they all present the same unsubstantiated rumours as absolute truth, and apart from placing their own individual spin on it, all appear to be reading from the same script.

The latest crop of truth purveyors, will also try and sell you the same theories as the old guard, albeit in a different, usually more attractive packet, and in my experience, apart from one or two people, I have not seen anything original or unique for a number of years.

A never-ending conveyer belt of slickly delivered, yet totally misleading and distracting, conspiratorial and confusing information, with little or no provenience, which has permeated almost everything that can be searched for online.

Some truthers devote an inordinate amount of time, (and the time of their readers) promoting many of these theories, so it also speaks volumes about their bold claims of being ‘Wide-Awake’ and ‘on the ball’ themselves doesn’t it?

This behaviour can be witnessed every day on social media, YouTube, various blogs and ‘Truth’ forums or anywhere else online, that gives truthers a platform from which to promote themselves, which of course has the potential to reach a worldwide audience.


A truly terrifying thought.

This same platform, once established, is also used to launch verbal attacks against those they perceive as not being ‘on the same page’ as the Truther, (or the bullshitter) which almost always involves the word ‘Shill’ (Shillaber) being directed at anyone who questions them.

Other preferred words are ‘Sheeple,’ or ‘Troll‘, or ‘Hater‘ or the standard issue ‘Narcissist’ and ‘Psychopath’.

Name-calling, personal attacks and threats, are usually a sign that there is little to back up what these people are writing about, as they are unable to substantiate anything they allege – or present a reasoned argument to support their claims.

Many also are clearly unable to provide evidence to back up any of their assertions or allegations, and the usual response to any questions being asked is a torrent of abuse.

Many will just block and/or report their inquisitors.

That usually applies to social media sites, as blogs and websites are usually able to edit, or simply delete negative comments or awkward questions that are asked.

Websites and blogs that constantly refer to their ‘worldwide’ popularity and large numbers of site visits, (usually in the millions) yet fail to display a hit counter, is also a sign that the website owner is exaggerating or being economic with the truth.

That then asks the question, what else are they hiding? – as installing hit counters are a simple matter of just dragging a ‘widget’ into the website’s sidebar.

Most normal thinking people must be able to see for themselves by now, (and have probably experienced) how those who do not subscribe to a truther’s hive mentality, often have no option but to waste many hours of their time, defending themselves against the inevitable onslaught of accusations and verbal abuse they are subjected to – not only by the truther themselves, but also by their hordes of sycophantic followers.

Which is the intention as it also prevents anyone getting answers to any valid questions that are being asked.

And don’t forget to hit the Paypal button before you leave….

It would serve no purpose to name them, given that their numbers appear to be limitless, with new ones popping up daily – who continually spew ever more nonsensical drivel into what is an already over saturated World Wide Web of half-truths and disinformation.

The Outlaw, however, will not support any of these people, nor link to their sites, nor will perpetuate any of the theories they try to promote as being of vital importance to anyone – except those who are truly ‘awake‘ that is.

One can only hope that there are some decent, honest individuals left out there, who are not charlatans, who will not continually spread endless bullshit to hundreds of other complete idiots, in the hope of getting support from yet more idiots …. Ad Nauseum.

I have been spending some time going through the work of historians Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett.

Among it, there was a reference to a story, that Jesus Christ may have survived the crucifixion, and been smuggled out of Jerusalem into Western Britain by Joseph of Arimathea and others, around AD 37

As Christianity is built entirely upon little or no physical evidence, it is notoriously, (or purposely) difficult to ‘prove’ or ‘disprove’ that Jesus Christ the man, actually existed.

Controversial Bible scholar Joseph Atwill has a theory that the New Testament stories about the life of Jesus Christ were actually an attempt by the Romans to end a series of violent uprisings in first-century Israel.


Other stories have circulated over the years which contradict the version that is generally known and recorded in the New Testament, so that would be as good a place to start as any.

The New Testament – or the Greek Testament, as it is sometimes referred to, was sanctioned by the Church, in the form that it is now recognised by, during the fourth century.

But, the various works that that make up the New Testament were written long before that, so the immediate questions that must be asked are – when exactly were they written, and by whom?

The most important parts of the New Testament are I believe, the Four ‘Gospels’.

Within these, one can find large segments about the life and work of Jesus Christ, from his birth, right through to the crucifixion and his alleged ‘resurrection’.

The original narrators do attempt to chronicle Jesus’ life in detail, although they appear to focus mainly on the last year of his life, specifically, the last week.

Two of the Gospels, also provide descriptions of Mary’s pregnancy and the birth of Jesus.

These descriptions, at least the three that were written first, are so similar in content, that it is generally agreed that they are based on each other.

All four of the Gospels, with the possible exception of Matthew, were originally written in Greek.

Jesus and his disciples spoke Aramaic, however.

So it is also generally agreed among scholars that the Bible as it is, was not written by Jesus or any of those closest to him.

The theory that Jesus Christ did not die on the cross, but faked his own death – has been around at least two hundred years, and has been argued about for at least as long.

In Germany, the theory was called ‘Die Scheintod-Hypothese’, (‘The Swoon Theory’) and was put forward by the German Theologian, H.E.G. Paulus, in three works published between 1800 and 1842.

Paulus believed that the simplest explanation was that Jesus never actually died on the cross, but was taken down alive, but unconscious.

This was not even a new theory, as two earlier works had presented a similar hypothesis.

Any theory regarding any person’s ability to survive crucifixion, would usually have to be based on contemporary witness statements or medical evidence, but in this case, actual evidence is understandably, impossible to source.

In fact, within the territories of the old Roman empire at that time, the remains of only one crucified person has ever been discovered, which appears to be the only solid evidence that crucifixion was actually practiced at all.

That was unearthed in 1968 within a bone chest, bearing the inscription ‘Yehohanan ben Hagakol’.

They contained the bones of a male who had obviously been crucified, between the years 1 and 70 CE.

His heels had been pierced with a nail, on which traces of wood were found and his legs had been broken.

No other finds from that period, and in that area have been discovered.

So that too, appears to be a dead end for researchers.

What about the actual practice of Crucifixion, would looking at that reveal any clues to back up any of these theories ?

“Crucifixion is one of the oldest forms of putting somebody to death, some theorists claim it was invented by the Persians and then adopted elsewhere fairly soon afterwards, around the sixth century BCE. The Romans may have learned about Crucifixion in Carthage, and made use of it to execute rebels, slaves who rose up against their masters, pirates, other non-Roman criminals, and particularly despised enemies. As a rule, Roman citizens did not run the risk of having to suffer this most degrading and cruel methods of execution.”

What made crucifixion so exceptionally cruel was the time it took for the crucified person to die. Generally, it took around twelve hours, but often lasted, two, three or even four days under almost unendurable pain. Opinions differ as to what was the actual cause of death, which ranged from suffocation to dehydration, coupled with other complications, such as being lashed beforehand. Shock, which was the result of blood loss, was also a factor, as, death was sometimes hastened by breaking the legs of the victim.

This was considered an act of mercy.

In some circumstances, the prisoner was nailed to the cross, sometimes they were tied and there were also different types of crosses used too. Some resembled the Christian cross, a long upright pole, with a horizontal bar a little way down from the top. A ‘Titulus,’ a sign with the condemned prisoners name was often fastened above her or his head. Sometimes the horizontal bar was fixed at the top of the pole, and some victims were set up on two poles that formed an X.

Crucifixion using a single pole has been described too, and this was probably the quickest method as it almost always led to suffocation, especially if the arms were stretched out above the head. The seat, (Sedile) which was often placed on the cross to take some of the weight off the arms, had no other function than to prolong the suffering and pain. Regardless of the construction, the idea behind crucifixion was maximum pain for the maximum time. The reason for this was to serve as a warning to the spectators and was very effective in pacifying them.

During the siege of Jerusalem, for instance, Roman soldiers tried to persuade the Jewish rebels to surrender by crucifying up to five hundred Jews every day along the walls of the city. Following the death of the victim, their bodies were left hanging and animals would often start to eat the corpse.

“Burial of crucifixion victims was not permitted. There do seem to have been exceptions, as (according to the versions that have survived) burial was so important to the Jews, sometimes the bodies were taken down before sunset and buried.”

Burial was not a common practice, however.

Even among the Romans, crucifixion was considered such a cruel form of execution that it was abandoned in the fourth century, during the rule of the Emperor Constantine.

So what really happened when Jesus of Nazareth was crucified?

Is there any evidence, written or otherwise that supports the theory that he survived, and went on to live out his life in virtual obscurity in another country altogether?

According to the Gospels, after Jesus was taunted, flogged and mocked, he then had the crown of thorns placed upon his head, and was dressed again before being taken out along the long walk along Via Delorosa to Golgotha.

It is here, that Jesus was relieved of his burden, the ‘patibulum’ (cross), by ‘a man called Simon, from Cyrene’, although why the accompanying soldiers forced a bystander to carry the horizontal bar is not explained.

The next bit is interesting, inasmuch as when the crucifixion party reach Golgotha, somebody gave Jesus “wine mixed with myrrh” (Mark), or “wine mixed with gall” (Matthew).

But “after tasting it, Jesus would not drink.”

So what was this drink ?

Was it an anaesthetic ?

It is recorded that when somebody was led out for execution, particularly Crucifixion, “he/she was given a goblet of wine containing a grain of Frankincense in order to be numb the senses.”

So why did Jesus refuse this drink ?

There is no mention of this in the Gospels, however, so again one can only speculate on why it was refused.

So how long was Jesus said to have hung on the cross ?

“It was nine in the morning when they crucified him…. At Midday a darkness fell over the whole land, which lasted until three in the afternoon; and at three in the afternoon Jesus cried aloud, ‘Eloï, Eloï, Lema sabachthani?’ Which means ‘My God, My God, why have you forsaken me ?’ Hearing this, some of the bystanders said, ‘listen, he is calling Elijah.’ Someone ran and soaked a sponge in sour wine and held it to his lips on the end of a stick. ‘Let us see,’ he said, ‘if Elijah will come to take him down.’ Then Jesus gave a loud cry and died;”

The above verses are from the Gospel of Mark.

Which is the only one that gives both the time of crucifixion and the time of Jesus’ death, from which, one can determine that he hung for six hours on the cross before he died.

A lot less than the twenty-four, forty-eight and seventy-two hours that it normally took somebody to die from crucifixion.

The Gospel of Mark even points out how unusually quick this was; “Pilate was surprised to hear that he had died so soon, and sent for the Centurion to make sure he was already dead.”

This information is missing from the Gospels of Matthew and Luke.

*Mark portrays this soldier as being very sympathetic towards Jesus, quoting his words as; “This man must have been the son of God” a portrayal which is echoed in the other Gospels, although according to Luke, the Centurions words were “Beyond all doubt, this man was innocent”… Strange words from a man who was responsible for his crucifixion, would you agree ?*

So what exactly happened when Jesus died ?

When Jesus Cried out, almost at a given signal, ‘somebody’ (who?) runs off and fills a sponge with sour wine and puts it against Jesus’ lips.

Immediately after this, Jesus stopped breathing.

This was, by all accounts, not a typical death from Crucifixion.

The fact that someone can cry out at all just before he died is also remarkable, and that aspect alone has caused scholars to comment that he actually died from a ‘ruptured heart’, caused by the heart muscle being weakened by a heart attack.

All of this is entirely possible, but is it probable ?

What ALL the advocates of Die Scheintod Hypothese claim, however, is that there was something in the liquid that Jesus drank just before he ‘died’.

Something that made him lose consciousness but not his life.

The Gospels do not furnish any clues as to the identity of the person who gave Jesus this mysterious liquid, apart from the mention of “the bystanders” in the Gospel of Matthew.

The Gospel of John also adds something else:

“Because it was the eve of the Sabbath, the Jews were anxious that the bodies should not remain on the crosses, since that sabbath was a day of great solemnity; so they requested Pilate to have the legs broken and the bodies taken down. The soldiers accordingly came to the men crucified with Jesus and broke the legs of each in turn, but when they came to Jesus and found he was already dead, they did not break his legs. But one of the soldiers thrust a lance into his side, and at once there was a flow of blood and water. This is vouched for by an eyewitness, who’s evidence us to be trusted. He knows that he speaks the truth, so they you too may believe.”

So if that account is accurate, it means that if Jesus was still alive, he would have been in a better position to survive as he had not had his legs broken like the others.

It is neither probable that a dead person would start to bleed to any great amount after having their side pierced by a lance, as a stopped heart does not pump blood around the body.

So it appears that there is a great deal that is not typical about how Jesus reportedly died on the cross – it happens far too quickly – he is far too physically strong just before the moment of death, being capable of talking as well as crying out.

It is also odd that three out the four Gospel writers, find reason to mention that Jesus accepted a drink just before the moment of his death.

How likely is it that someone can survive a Crucifixion, albeit one that has been interrupted ?

It has happened.

Flavius Josephus gave an example from his own life:

“And when I was sent by Titus Caesar with Cerealius, and a thousand horsemen, to a certain village called Thecoa, on order to know whether it were a place for a camp, as I came back, I saw many slaves crucified, and remembered three of them as my former acquaintance. I was very sorry at this in my mind, and went away with tears in my eyes to Titus, and told him of them: so he immediately commanded them to be taken down, and to have the greatest care taken of them, in order to accomplish their recovery; yet two of them died under the physician’s hands, while the third recovered.”

What happened after the Romans have judged Jesus to be dead, is of interest too.

A new person is introduced into the story, one that the Gospel writers give limited information about, so very little is known about him.

This man, described in the Gospel of Matthew as ‘a rich man,’ played an important role in what happened to the body of Jesus after the Crucifiction, asking Pilate for Jesus’ body, wrapping it in a sheet and laying it in a tomb cut out of rock and rolling a large stone across the entrance.

This man also plays a central role in the theory introduced by Alan Wilson, Barum Blackett and others, who believe that Jesus did not die on the cross as the Bible states.

The Bible does refer to this new person by name, however.

Joseph of Arimathea….

Adapted by the Outlaw
From ‘The Jesus Mystery’ by Lena Einhorn (2007)




Others who have put forward the ‘Swoon Theory’: George Moore, Frank Harris, Ernest brougham Docker, D. H. Lawrence, Robert Graves, and Joshua Podro, Hugh J. Schonfield, Donovan Joyce, J. D. M. Derrett, Holger Kersten and Elmar R. Gruber, Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln, Barbara Theiring, Gérald Messadié, and Helmer Linderholm.

The THEORY of Relativity, The THEORY of Evolution, The Big Bang THEORY, Cell THEORY, Chaos THEORY, Molecular THEORY and Conspiracy THEORY.

All of the above terms, with the exception of Conspiracy THEORY, have, at one time or another, been accepted as FACTS by the majority of the worlds population.

According to WIKIPEDIA, a THEORY is a contemplative and rational type of abstract or generalised THINKING, or the results of such THINKING.

Depending on the context, the results of such THINKING, include generalised (accepted) explanations of how nature works, or how the planet came into being for example.

A THEORY, in simple terms, is used to provide an explanation for an observation, which attempts to give a possible HYPOTHESIS to support the given explanation.

A THEORY can also be called upon to CHALLENGE the original THEORY, which is usually an official or generally accepted explanation for any given event, which of course is where the term Conspiracy THEORIST is sometimes used.

A Conspiracy THEORIST, is also a derogatory term used by the established order, which normally includes the mainstream media, to marginalise, isolate, ridicule and target anybody who offers an alternative THEORY which challenges the ‘Accepted’ explanation.

‘According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first use of the phrase “conspiracy theory” occurred in a 1909 article in The American Historical Review. Other sources predate this use by nearly four decades to at least 1871, where it is used in The Journal of Mental Science reporting on a conference of the Fifth Quarterly Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association (now the Royal College of Psychiatrists), held on January 27, 1870:’

 “The theory of Dr. Sankey as to the manner in which these injuries to the chest occurred in asylums deserved our careful attention. It was at least more plausible than the conspiracy theory of Mr. Charles Beade…” – WIKIPEDIA

Most science is based on THEORY, all religion is based on THEORY, even the explanation of how human beings came to exist on this planet is based on a THEORY which has been almost universally accepted as FACT.

Theologists have argued (THEORISED) as to the true meaning of the Bible, in much the same way as Scientists have disagreed over any number of THEORIES, in order to PROVE that their personal THEORY is the only one possible, ie: The universally acceptable answer.

Answers, or accepted ‘FACTS’ which until fairly recently, have remained almost unchallenged by the world’s population for many hundreds of years.

The thing to remember is, just because something is universally believed by many people to be a FACT, does not mean it is a TRUE reflection of the actual events that occurred.

It will serve no purpose to list all the events which has shown this to be the case, but using the GULF OF TONKIN INCIDENT as only one example, it clearly shows how organised False Flag events have been used throughout history to steer the opinions of any population, to support a political agenda.

You may have noticed I am using WIKIPEDIA references throughout this article.

That is deliberate as WIKIPEDIA appears to be the main source of information used by the majority of people who do their research online.

Which ironically, is just another example of how an entirely controlled source of readily available, searchable information is still seen to be the first port of call for most people.

So if it’s on WIKIPEDIA, many people will accept it as FACT and look no further.

Most people are steered towards the ‘Acceptable’ version of any given event, almost as soon as they begin an online search, as they will find WIKIPEDIA entries feature prominently if search engines such as Google, Dogpile, Yahoo, AOL and MSN are used as a source.

Is it starting to register yet?

You may have also noticed that I use the term ‘Established Order‘ to describe the entities that exist throughout the world, which remotely control every word the Media print, which in turn controls the thinking of the majority of the population.

From experience, I know that when writers refer to the ever-present yet shadowy figures that exist behind the scenes of the public image of Government for example, many less enlightened and supposedly intelligent people, will refer to it as ‘Classic New World Order Nonsense’ or ‘That rubbish about the Illuminati’ and dismiss it without another thought.

‘Conspiracy Theorist’, has like other related words, such as ‘Racist’, ‘Bigot’, ‘Sexist’, ‘Anti-Semetic’, ‘Homophobic’, ‘Islamophobe’, ‘Transphobic’ and so on, have been used as a cover-all solution simply to prevent awkward questions being asked.

For instance, if a Pro-Gay article is published, you will find that it’s entirely pointless to question or disagree with the content, as you will instantly be labelled as being ‘Anti-Gay‘ a ‘Hater’ or a ‘Troll’ or something similar, a call which is of course taken up by any number of similarly brainwashed people who are terrified lest the same label becomes attached to them.

Regardless of whether the article is a complete load of shit or not, it becomes almost immune from any form of criticism, in the same way that ‘Pro-Jewish’ or ‘Pro-Islam’ articles become untouchable regardless of the veracity of the content matter.

An example that springs to mind immediately was an interview conducted by the always delightful Kay Burley of Sky News, following the UK Riots of 2011.

She asked the owner of a shop that was ransacked during the previous evenings disturbances, if he could in fact, identify any of those involved.

He replied in the affirmative, adding that they were ”local black kids”, which caused the MSM Mouthpiece Burley to cut him off mid-sentence reminding him that “he could not say that”.

The man replied, “yes I can because I know them, they live around here, they shop at my premises”….

You then saw the camera cutting away towards the broken shop fronts.

That is the establishment and mainstream Media’s agenda in plain view, a view that one simply cannot comment or speak the truth, just in case someone is offended or outraged by it.

Which of course they will be, as the programming is deeply ingrained.

That is only one example.

If you care to explore further, you will find many, many similar examples in the mainstream media, all ‘approved’ reading materials in educational establishments, local and national government literature and the list goes on.

Why are people so offended by the truth?

Because they have been told to be offended, they are encouraged on a daily basis by the programmes they watch on the television, by the reminders in movies and the mainstream media, in all it’s formats.

Since the Internet has become a part of daily life, the latest ‘Buzzword’ that is being utilised to great effect, is the word ‘Troll’.

Once again, the correct definition of an Internet Troll has been discarded to retro-fit almost anything that does not conform to the established thought patterns of much of the population, who’s belief systems have been nurtured by the mainstream media.

“In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. This sense of the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, but have been used more widely. Media attention in recent years has equated trolling with online harassment. For example, mass media has used troll to describe “a person who defaces Internet tribute sites with the aim of causing grief to families.” WIKIPEDIA

You will notice that the WIKIPEDIA entry has now allegedly been edited to include material published on Websites and Blogs with ‘the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response’, which as I remember it, did not refer to material published on ones own website.

The real definition of an Internet Troll is a person that posts inflammatory, hateful and cruel comments on forums, Blogs, Chatrooms and Social Media, with the sole intention of causing fear and distress to the person or group being ‘Trolled’.

Does that sound like somebody who writes on his own blog and does not force anyone to read it ?

Even the edited Wikipedia entry acknowledges that mass media was responsible for changing the definition to further it’s own agenda.

And of course, it is difficult to miss the daily occurrences of mainstream bloggers and Social Media users who constantly refer to anybody who asks perfectly valid questions as being ‘Trolls.

The Internet may seem at times to resemble the Wild West, but it is still the only viable source of uncensored information freely available to everyone.

It would be wise to remember that every time you shriek, ‘Troll’ and are dutifully offended by something that offers an alternative view, it is still your choice entirely whether or not to read that view.

The Internet is the only freely available platform that is able to offer you that alternative, or any alternative view for that matter.

The establishment and the mainstream media will never give you that option, you can remain assured of that.

It now appears that many of the population on this spinning rock have now become participants in a worldwide multiplayer version of ‘Where’s Wally.’

The ‘Wally’ in question, being a Malaysian Boeing 777 Airliner which has allegedly vanished without trace.

The MSM is strangely reporting on every conspiracy theory that is doing the rounds, while the conspirators are beside themselves with their theories ranging from everything from Air Piracy and Top Secret Government Weaponry, right through to the ever popular standby of good old fashioned Alien Abduction.

The most bizarre connection I have seen would have to be the Jimmy Savile Connection, which is being offered on the David Icke Forums.

The amount of disinformation that has accompanied this event is unprecedented, which has led to questions starting to be asked of those who proport to be a part of the Alternative Media, who generally can be reliably looked on to fill in the MSM blanks.

In many ways it’s a dream scenario for those who stand to benefit from discrediting those in the Alternative Media who are making things very uncomfortable for those who hold the reins of power at the current time.

So, unsurprisingly, the theories are coming thick and fast and the more outlandish and unbelievable they appear to be, the more legs they appear to have.

Which of course may be the intention.

From what is currently available, I can see two, maybe three possibilities regarding the fate of Malaysian Airways MS370, some of which have already been discussed.

The first is that there never was a flight along that route, the whole thing is/was set up using crisis actors to represent the passengers relatives and friends at the airport.

The MSM are/were fully aware of this and are playing along for whatever reason that might be.

The second is that the flight was somehow diverted using an AWAC (Airborne Early Warning and Control) type system, flown to an undisclosed location with the full knowledge of those countries involved and held there for future use, possibly a ‘False Flag’ event which involves an airliner flying into a building for example.

That would mean that the crew and passengers, would have to be either disposed of in some way, or were in some way involved which is highly unlikely.

The United States and the Russians are more than capable of spotting a vehicle numberplate, or recognising facial features from satellites using technology that was available during the early 1980’s, so are they now saying that they have no way of tracking and locating the whereabouts of an Airliner the size of a 777?

You are being told that not only the Americans, but the Chinese, the Russians and more than twenty other countries are involved in what is being described in the MSM as a ‘search covering more than 10% of the surface of this planet.’

But not a drop of fuel, oil, luggage or wreckage of any description has been located, which rules out a crash landing, or at least one that has been reported.

So what’s left?

An Emelia Earhart type mystery that will forever more be debated and speculated upon as another of the world’s great mysteries?

Or, a precursor to an even bigger, and more mysterious future event?

I was not going to comment on what should be, after all, a private matter.

I have noticed however, that the Jackals who pertain to be a part of the Alt Media have already starting posting speculative claptrap on their blogs about this matter and allowing ludicrous accusations to be allowed through as ‘comments.’

Yes, Sonia Poulton has parted company with The Peoples Voice.

Her reasons for doing so are justified and, although subject to endless gossip and ill-informed statements, remain a private matter between her and The Peoples Voice.

I support her decision 100%, not out of any kind of misplaced loyalty or personal preference, but because, I know her, I trust her and more importantly, I trust her judgement.

This would not have been an easy decision I would imagine for her, and would not have been taken without a great deal of heart searching and solid reasoning.

I am not going to speculate, tittilate or insult my readers with a possible reason, (or even a conspiracy theory *smiley face*) because, as I said earlier, it’s a private matter which I am sure will be addressed, in the proper manner at a suitable time.