All posts tagged Conservative

There are not many people, who by now, are not aware of the image published on the Mirror website, which pictured a four-year-old child, with suspected pneumonia, lying on top of a pile of coats, upon the floor of a side room in Leeds General Infirmary.

The Mirror, then switches to the real purpose of its article:

Jack shows the human cost of the harshest ever financial squeeze on the NHS, a damning indictment of the Tories’ criminal neglect.

No wonder Jack’s mother is switching from the Tories to Labour on Thursday.

This article is then picked up with what appears to be indecent haste, and within hours, is being paraded around the mass media by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, and a small – but disturbingly fanatical – army of online activists and cheerleaders.

The article continues:

The staff are blameless, performing miracles despite the cuts. As are hard-pressed managers, coping best they can with the bad hands dealt them by successive Conservative regimes.

I am not going into the obvious issues with the NHS here, nor why it has reached what seems to be critical mass, there is plenty of source material available online, which explains in finite detail the real reasons behind that, and who is ultimately responsible.

What I am going to do is focus on is the image, and how it has been shamelessly weaponised by the Labour Party.

The image in question, has itself become the focus of claims as to its authenticity, and its context, inasmuch as a viral post on Facebook, which claims that the image was staged, has been gaining traction in the mass media.

The response to this online, is that the Facebook post, is of course, complete fiction, and is being circulated by, wait for it, ‘Right Wing Bots’.

One source of that claim, is a blogger calling himself ‘Tom Pride’, who has, for the last few years, been pumping hard-left propaganda focussing on the UK, and attacking anyone who does not support Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, from his base in Poland.

[Which of course does not mean that there is any suspicion whatsoever, of any ‘foreign interference’ in the electoral process, a claim that politicians and the mass media, on both sides of the Atlantic love to talk about.]

The truth of this, I am sure will emerge in the fullness of time, but the fact remains that using a distressed child as a political tool with which to attack political enemies, is a despicable thing to do.

It’s beneath contempt.

Neither side of the political divide are blameless in this, and it was not so long ago,  that the Grenfell fire tragedy was being utilised by both sides, in their attempts to point the finger of blame at each other.

Is it worth mentioning, that one of the reasons why many people believe that picture was ‘staged’ for the media, is because it’s not the first time that the Labour Party have posted faked and/or staged images for political gain?

Remember this one?

That doctored image, led to the party being investigated for spreading fake news, and were slammed by the NHS itself, as they had not sought permission to use its logo.

This image may be familiar too.

A blatant example of the use of a staged photograph of Jeremy Corbyn, sitting with a despondent look on his face, on the floor of a train, in a crass attempt to highlight the overcrowding on that particular railway network.

He was accused of ‘Hypocrisy’ and ‘spin’ by the Telegraph, after CCTV revealed that he did in fact have a seat, despite claiming that the train was so ‘ram packed’ he had to sit on the floor!

This post is not ‘Pro’ or ‘Anti’ anybody, I am on the whole, pretty much disgusted by the behaviour of all the political parties, who are scrabbling in the gutter, and clawing and biting and spitting bile at each other in their attempts to reach the moral high ground first.

They have all failed miserably on that score in my opinion.

There are, however, many positives to take from this, as it must now appear glaringly obvious to anyone, that politicians and political parties, of all colours; lie, cheat, mislead, spread fake news, stage photo opportunities, and above all of that, have shown utter contempt for the very people they claim to represent.

It’s little wonder that this country has become a laughing stock in the eyes of the rest of the world, and going on what is currently happening, and shows no sign of going away any time soon, the political class do not actually give a damn.


The campaign leading up to the 2019 General Election, or as many people view it, the ‘Brexit Election,’ has been one of the most vicious, propaganda-filled, mistruth littered, and ultimately damaging, this country has witnessed in living memory.

Every one of the main political parties have lied, to varying degrees, and have mislead the electorate on a number of important issues, but by far the most pernicious, (and grossly inaccurate) claim, made by Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, is that Boris Johnson and the Conservative and Unionist Party, are ‘going to sell the InterNational Health Service to Donald Trump and the Americans’.

This claim was wholly predictable, however, and the Labour Party’s election campaign has focussed upon, and revolved entirely around this one issue, and it appears to be the only thing they have been able to effectively weaponise.

Your NHS.

On the surface, this untested, and unsubstantiated claim has had a remarkable effect, inasmuch as if more floating voters decide to fall for it, this country could be heading towards a hung parliament; which could mean that the hard-left socialists Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, could obtain the keys to Downing Street, if, and only if, they are supported by an unholy alliance comprising of the Liberal Democrats, The Green Party, and the Scottish and Welsh Nationalists.

Which would, in the light of day, also mean at least four more years of public confusion, electoral chaos, in all possibility the economy crashing,  Brexit being put on hold, or scrapped altogether, which spits in the face of 17.4 Million of the electorate, and years more hardship and misery for millions of people who can least endure it.

So with that in mind, I would like to share the following video with you.

A video which, in my opinion, demolishes Jeremy Corbyn’s claim about the NHS entirely, and should, at the very least, make any person who cares about the truth, (and has grown sick and tired of the sheer arrogance and patronising attitudes shown to them by the current crop of politicians) think long and hard about who they really want – and ultimately trust – to take this once great country forward.

While doing some background work on the second part of a JACK THE RIPPER examination I am currently working on, I have been spending some time trawling through some of the contemporary newspaper reports and periodicals from 1888 which reported on the case.

As is often the case when researching articles for possible inclusion on this site, I find something which takes me off in a completely different direction altogether, which is what has happened here, inasmuch as although the main subject of this article has a link to the Whitechapel murders, albeit a tenuous one – it will, at some point, tie in with my telling of the Ripper story.

‘Jack the Ripper’ was not the first serial killer, although he may well have been the first one to ‘ply his trade’ entirely within the confines of a major metropolis; and he almost certainly was the first to operate when the general population had become literate, and the mass media had began to influence not only what people were reading every day, but also what they were supposed to ‘believe‘.

Now that last bit is important, as throughout history, and even more so over the last one hundred and fifty years, certain events that have become embedded in the psyché of so many people, and believed to be true – have been planted there by the mass media and the entertainment industry.

I am not talking about ‘False Flag’ attacks here, a number of which have been catalysts for starting wars and forcing regime changes throughout the world via invasions, as many of those events have since been shown to be entirely manufactured and State-Sponsored, and there is more than enough evidence available to support that.

What I am referring to is something that has been widely-studied by psychologists and is known as ‘Belief Perseverance’, and is something that anyone can fall prey to, although some people are more prone to it than others.

Belief perseverance, is exactly as it sounds, it’s an unshakeable and continuing belief in something or someone, that has been shown to be false, regardless of any evidence that is presented to show just that.

It’s the reason why so many people year upon year fall for hoaxes, and the reason that so many become victims of liars, fraudsters, con artists and professional grifters, as normal, everyday folk tend to see the best in others and simply do not believe that people can be so callous and would do anything that devious.

The mass media are no different, they know only too well how to sell lies as truth, they do it on a daily basis, and they know exactly how to influence and steer people towards supporting what have turned out to have been some very unpopular political ideas – a good example of this is how the British media have covertly managed to demonise the disabled, the unemployed and the working poor by way of some very biased news coverage and television programming.

Over a few short months, the mass media have purposely and very successfully divided the country down the middle, and very few people have noticed what has actually happened.

Another similar example happened in 1973, when the UK entered the Common Market, as it was known as then, following what could be viewed as an exercise in propaganda, as by 1971 it was blatantly obvious that most British newspapers were totally committed to Britain becoming a member of the EEC, the only exceptions being those under the Express umbrella of publications.

A large proportion of the population were totally unaware of the fact that the results of an opinion poll in 1973, showed that the British people were against entering the EEC by an astounding ratio of three to one – the mass media of course failed to publish anything like those figures.

Even though public feeling was against it, and even suggesting the idea of entering the union was seen as being political suicide, the Government of Edward Heath still pushed ahead and spent £10M of taxpayers money on printing and distributing literature praising the virtues of becoming an EEC member, and produced a ‘White Paper’ which was full of totally unsubstantiated claims to support their claims.

The mass media deliberately left out any mention of the annual costs of membership, or the fact that joining the EEC was the first step along the road towards creating a Federal States of Europe.

Heath and the Tories only managed to get away with what was viewed as a ‘Betrayal of the British People’, because the mass media had also decided that entry was a ‘good thing’ (for them and their owners), and did not publicaly question a single claim made by Heath or the Conservative administration.

Pro-EEC rhetoric appeared on most news and feature pages, and was reinforced by massive numbers of full page advertisements paid for by the Pro-European Movement.

Anybody who has peeled back a few layers of what really went on back then, would have established that if the mass media had done their job properly, investigated like real journalists and fully analysed the real purpose and true cost of the Common Market, Britain would have almost certainly never have joined, and would now be an eminently wealthier and more powerful nation.

Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath took Britain into the EEC without giving the electorate the opportunity to say whether or not their country should become part of this ‘project‘, and the mass media was the tool the Tory Government utilised to achieve it.

But that was forty-three years ago, and you would think that the British population would have learned something by now wouldn’t you?

But I shall assume that it’s a pretty safe bet, that despite the depth of feeling among the electorate, the numbers at the Grassroots level who want to leave, and all the signs that are pointing to Britain’s continued membership of the EU meaning the total loss of what remains of our identity – and the end of everything it’s people hold dear ….. Britain, and it’s people will be seen by the world as voting to stay within the union.

Whether that will be true or not is apparently of no consequence, because that is what history will record as being the outcome of the June referendum.

No doubt many people have seen the image below doing the rounds on social media.

An image which allegedly shows British Prime Minister David Cameron, albeit much younger, about to insert his private parts into the mouth of a severed pigs head as he attended a meeting of the Oxford Piers Gaveston Dining Society, while at University.


This particular image has been shared online thousands of times, with scarcely a thought as to it’s actual provinence.

‘Hungarian Debutante Ball, New York City February 1978 – by Larry Fink

As much as the Outlaw, and undoubtably many others would relish the idea of seeing a prominent Conservative, Liberal Democrat or Labour Party politician, photographed in what would without a doubt, be a compromising and possibly career destroying situation, the above image unfortunately, was never going to effectively provide evidence of one.



Politics is a dirty business, and anybody with a basic understanding of ‘Parapolitics’, especially in regard to it’s obvious connections to the ungodly rise of ‘Thatcherism’ in the 1970’s, may also have noticed the parallels with what we are witnessing in this country today.

In it’s simplest terms, Parapolitics is a term used to describe covert political activity, or a complete political system which contains elements of both the military and intelligence apparatus, which is hidden from the public.

With that in mind, it would be foolish to dismiss entirely, the links between what was happening in the years between the resignation of Harold Wilson in 1976, and Margaret Thatcher becoming Prime Minister in 1979 – especially now that her predecessor Edward Heath, has become the main focus of the mainstream-media led purge on alleged child abusers within the British establishment.


If the primary role of the intelligence agency that was behind a number of ‘smear campaigns‘ against a number of politicians in the 1970’s – especially if they were on the left of the political spectrum was highlighted, it may explain why certain names keep cropping up whenever establishment child abuse is discussed.

The intelligence agency that was central to those politically turbulent years was MI5, and the main role of MI5 was, and still is to prevent radical political change in Britain.

It has other roles of course, but for the purposes of this article, I will focus on it’s primary aim, which is to defend the state against those on the left of British politics, and continually works towards undermining them whenever possible.

In reality, however, very little is actually known about many of the domestic operations undertaken by MI5, but a recently unclassified document shows that as far back as 1940, an unnamed person in the U.S. state Department, was given information about MI5’s ‘central index of suspicious persons’ – which was basically, a list of people that were suspected of ‘Anti British Activity’.

That ‘list’ contained around 4,500,000 names, and was freely available to both Government Departments and the heads of British industry, and that was in 1940, so is it possible that similar lists were being used in the 1970’s and are in use today to identify so-called ‘subversives’?

And who is it that MI5 collects this information for?

Three obvious candidates spring to mind immediately; The State Itself, Employers, and of course the Conservative Party, although other agencies around the world are believed to have access via various exchanges of information between allies.

Articles published in the Guardian newspaper, in March 1981 revealed that the construction firm Taylor Woodrow were among a number of companies who had access to this list, and Taylor Woodrow is also one of the companies, who have documented links to funding various right-wing groups.

In August 1985, it was revealed that MI5 were directly responsible for the vetting of BBC employees, and during the 1970’s, ‘Common Cause’, the ‘Economic League’, the ‘Foreign Affairs Publishing Company’ and the ‘Institute for the Study of Conflict’, were all receiving information about the British left from MI5.

So going on what has been basically outlined above, can one safely assume that one of the roles of the Intelligence Services, specifically MI5, is to ensure that Britain is subtly, and covertly steered towards the right politically?

*Could it also answer the question that many were asking following the 2015 General Election, as to how the Conservative Party were elected with a small majority with only 36.7% of the electorate supporting them?*

And is it also possible, that smearing and undermining political opponents is only one method being used to achieve this?

I suggest this, because on May the 9th 1976, the Daily Telegraph published a report from Washington, titled “Campaign in the US to smear British MPs”, which said:”Persistent efforts have been made in recent months to discredit leading members of the three major political parties, by planting derogatory stories about them on news agencies in Washington, it was claimed last night.”

A Dr. Edward von Rothkirk of Transworld News, was quoted as having received derogatory material on eleven MPs – a Conservative (Edward Heath), a number of Liberals (including Jeremy Thorpe, Clement Freud and Cyril Smith) and seven Labour MPs, one of whom was Harold Wilson.

*As history has shown, Thorpe was effectively destroyed and despite the rumours that were circulated about Clement Freud and Cyril Smith, the Liberals, (and potential allies of the Labour Party) survived.*

The material first started arriving in 1975, and was being sent by both English and South African sources, but almost immediately following the Telegraph exposé, the Transworld offices were burgled and and the material regarding the British Politicians was taken.

Among this material were the allegations that had been made by the Czech spy, Joseph Frolik, who had defected to the United States in 1969, when the Labour Party were still in power.

Frolik’s allegations included his claim that a number of Labour Party members and trade unionists who were either Czech agents, or were ‘targets’ of the Czech intelligence services.

Those names were never reported in the British media at the time and included Will Owen MP, the late Tom Driberg, the late Sir Barnet Stross, and interestingly, John Stonehouse MP, a member of the Government at the time.

Now Frolik’s allegations were advantageous to the right, inasmuch as they provided the evidence that was needed to support the rumours already circulating, that the Labour Party and the Trade Unions in Britain were riddled with Communists and enemy agents, which was fortuitous and more than a little convenient, as was observed at the time.

The Frolic Defection

It was Frolik who made the original allegations about Edward Heath in a book,  ‘The Frolik Defection – The Memoirs of an Intelligence Agent’, published by Corgi Books in 1975.

It should be noted that Frolik’s source has emphatically denied the claims as they were presented in the book, insisting that the ‘Honey Trap’ , (which involved a young male Czech organist) that was put in place in an attempt to blackmail Heath, was unsuccessful as Heath was tipped off by MI5 and a trip to Prague that was to have been the rendezvous, never actually happened.

However, it is now thought that Heath-Hating elements of the Tory Right, who were fanatical supporters of Margaret Thatcher, had made the claim that the entrapment actually happened and had ensured that it appeared in Froliks’s book.

Coincidentally, a letter was published by Searchlight and later on in Private Eye Magazine that year, and was addressed to Sir Stephen Hastings MP and supposedly came from the fanatically Thatcherite former spy, George Kennedy Young.

The letter contained the line “The Queer will be dethroned”…. Allegedly referring to Heath.

The Tory hard right detested Heath and were fanatical supporters of Thatcher, and they were more than a little angry about Heath’s failure to beat the Unions, the destruction of many English counties due to local government organisation, as well as Heath’s purge on Anti-European Tory Candidates.

The original smears against Edward Heath were based solely on the unsubstantiated belief that he was homosexual, not a murderous, paedophile who preyed on kids from care homes, which now appears to be the accusation.

There was another attempt to smear Heath in 1985.

I have always maintained on this site that many of the allegations of child abuse and paedophilia, especially those that involve politicians are politically motivated, and circulated willingly by the mainstream media who apparently, have a few scores of their own to settle.

The latest series of allegations were instigated by politicians on the left.

Primarily by Tom Watson MP, who only recently has announced his intention to stand as deputy leader of the Labour Party, and Simon Danczuk MP, who’s driving force seems to be the sales of his book about Cyril Smith, and appears to have been of more importance than the grooming and systematic abuse of thousands of young white girls by Pakistani gangs, in his own constituency of Rochdale.

As has been shown above, the agencies that are actively working towards ensuring that the political right hold onto the reins of power, are more than capable of setting up any number of groups online – including a number of those who purportedly operate within the ‘Alternative Media’ and by infiltrating social media, and who’s sole purpose is to spread rumour and disinformation in order to influence public opinion.

This has been shown to be a very successful method of planting stories that have been allowed to freely circulate both online, and in the mainstream media, to the point where it is now almost impossible to separate fact from fiction.

And once again, it’s the genuine victims of childhood abuse, (I am loathe to use the term survivor), who are once again being overlooked in the melee.

And that is the real scandal, and one that will not be addressed any time soon.

“That this House believes that justice for the survivors of child abuse should be a priority for the Government; notes that concerns have been raised by current and former police officers and special branch officers that by coming forward with evidence related to child abuse they could be prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act 1989; and calls on the Government to introduce legislation to remove the threat of prosecution for anyone who has reasonable cause to believe that the information, document or article they disclose is relevant to an official investigation of, or inquiry into, historic child abuse.”






Early Day Motion 38 27/5/2015

Many people were visibly shocked at the result of the 2015 UK General Election.

Was it through people’s fear of resurgent Nationalist parties that gave the Conservative Party a totally unexpected, although slim majority – or are the emerging stories of Ballot boxes being found unopened, and hundreds of thousands of ballot papers being stolen en route to districts where UKIP candidates stood a good chance of winning, more than just rumours?

Is the sudden and unexpected popularity of the Conservative party at the polls, a true reflection of the British electorate, or is there more to the result than the British people are being told?

If the document below is genuine, it shows that the Conservative Party has spent £114,956,21 on it’s Facebook profile alone, and £36,710,20 was spent on purchasing Facebook ‘Likes’ in order to make the Conservative Party appear more popular on social media than they actually are.

Which then asks the question, how much money has been spent elsewhere to ensure a favourable result for a political party that in reality, attracted only 36.9% of the overall vote?

And what exactly did they get for their money?

I never have had much time for politics or politicians.

It is my belief that there is no discernible difference between any of the main parties any more, in fact, it appears that the only way to tell the difference between them is the colour of their ties.

However, I am very much aware that the 2015 General Election is going to be the most dirty and underhanded political campaign for decades, as the main players are crapping themselves that the voting British Public may have finally woken up.

(The smear campaigns already in full swing by the main parties, assisted by the mainstream media, coupled with the constant accusations of the ever-popular ‘Racism’ may give a clue to what is coming.)

Left and Right Wing politicians do not even exist anymore, and have been replaced by a gaggle of chattering corporate mouthpieces, fighting each other over occupancy of the middle ground, and becoming increasingly desperate to cling on to what little credibility they once had.

Very, very few politicians actually have the slightest idea about what the majority of this nation want from those, who, after all, only hold the position they do because they were chosen by the electorate.

That is the reason that anyone chooses to vote at all isn’t it?

To elect people that will represent them, to listen to them, and at least make an visible attempt to address the issues their constituents raise.

In 2015, however, there may an even more worrying reason why the main parties are in a state of panic.

Whether you acknowledge it or not, Nigel Farage and the UK Independence Party have been causing a lot more than a ripple, and that in turn, has been felt throughout the country and has really put the proverbial cat amongst the parliamentary Pigeons.

I have no feelings either way for Farage and UKIP, although I believe his stance on leaving the European Commission should be supported, his admiration of Margaret Thatcher, his open support of both Fracking and Nuclear Energy, however, will be his Achilles Heel and there is no getting away from that, as I see it.

UKIP are, on paper at least, streets ahead in the upcoming European elections, and whether that momentum can be carried over to the General Election is still to be seen; but as a party, they have certainly struck a chord among the grassroots electorate, and the main parties would be foolish beyond belief to ignore that.

As it stands, the political classes of the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats seem to be in total disarray, which should not come as a surprise considering that Farage is speaking the same language, and giving a voice to the very real concerns of ordinary people and not the political elite.

On the surface at least.

He is also unusual in that he has had a proper job in the real world… He has worked for a living, albeit as a Banker.

Comparing him to the other party leaders, it’s easy to see the difference.

David Cameron, talks tough on resisting European interference – but that is all it is, because as soon as German chancellor Angela Merkel speaks, Tory posh boy Cameron, immediately falls into line.

He also talks about holding a Referendum on withdrawal from Europe only if he and the Conservatives are returned to power in 2015 – that is way too many if’s for me, and others may agree.

If the truth is told, he does not even want a referendum, it’s the increasing support for Farage and UKIP that has forced his hand.

He seems content to play the role of the Gym Boxer, pretty sharp while performing in front of the mirror, but positively useless and vunerable when he actually has to step in the ring.

The Labour leader Ed Miliband is no better, has he actually got anything right?

He is a chancer and just another privileged mouthpiece, who has zero experience of living and working in the real world.

Admittedly he did go to a state school, but it was a posh one which ensured he went straight to University and then into politics with a safe seat in the House of Commons.

A good pension at the end of it too – not bad for somebody who has never held a proper job!

He is the ‘leader’ of a party who once represented the ordinary working people of this country, but that party now is so conceited, that it believes that the people who pay their wages should not even be trusted to vote!

That brings us onto Nick Clegg, the stand-in that David Cameron needs as an excuse when he fails to deliver on any of his pre-election pledges (which were lies anyway).

Mr. Clegg is another one who has never worked in the real world.

He sold the students down the river over top-up fees, and like the other party leaders, continually denies any knowledge concerning allegations of Paedophilia among the ex-grandees within his own party.

Sir Cyril Smith anyone?

I don’t remember the Labour Party ever commenting on LABOUR25 either, while the Tories also remain damnably tight-lipped about the alleged Paedophiles within their Membership too.

Would I vote for any of the main parties?

Certainly not, and I would not vote for Farage and UKIP.

I would not cast my vote for BRITAIN FIRST either, as any party that perpetuates the Lee Rigby false flag, and uses an image of Winston Churchill as something to aspire too, is anathema to anyone even slightly educated or a student of real British/English history.

I will be voting though, but for the only candidate who has shown a visible presence in the place I live, and has at least attempted to answer my many questions and offers something new and different.

If more people did the same, the big parties, who have made a complete balls-up thus far, would really have to up their game and start to realise that Britain is not in fact, populated by hordes of Brain-dead zombies who will put up with anything without a murmur of complaint.

People who are no longer prepared to vote the same way as their parents out of loyalty, and who clearly show that they are sickened by the complacency and utter contempt that has been shown to them by those who should be acting on their behalf.

A nation of people that will no longer accept the common-purpose puppets that are continually rolled out when needed, mouthing empty words and who continually betray and try to sell out both this country and it’s people to the highest bidder.

I fully expect to be in the minority, but my conscience will be clear at least.

This morning, my attention was drawn to a short Twitter exchange that appeared on my timeline.

The Conservative ex-Junior Health Minister, Edwina Currie, was asked a question which referred, (I assume) to the recent revelations that it may soon become a legal requirement to report any instances of Child Abuse.

Ms Currie was then asked “Wouldn’t the paedophile MP Peter Morrison had been convicted if you and other MP’s had reported him as a Noted Pedarist.”

To which Ms Currie replied “But you need evidence. dates, times, places, names. I had none, nothing. But that’s the label he carried.”

I then asked her “That did not prevent you from using the very same ‘unproven’ information to promote your book, eh Edwina?”

I received no response, at the time of writing.

I felt that question was justified as on the 25th November 2012, David Icke published a widely reproduced extract from Edwina Currie’s Diaries 1987-1992 on his website, in which she outed Peter Morrison as a ‘noted pederast’:

DAVID ICKE HEADLINES 25th November 2012

Reproductions of the same quote can only be found online, on various forums and blogs, so I needed a definitive version.

Copies of Edwina Currie’s Diaries 1987-1992 can easily be sourced online, I did a quick search on both Amazon and eBay and found copies available from £0.01 and up to £11.01 for the hardback edition.


On page 195 of the hardback edition, it reads, verbatim:

“One appointment in the recent reshuffle has attracted a lot of gossip and could be very dangerous: Peter Morrison has become the PM’s PPS. Now he’s what they call a ‘noted pederast’, with a liking for young boys; he admitted as much to Norman Tebbit when he became deputy chairman of the party but added’ ‘However, I’m very discreet’ – and he must be! She either knows and is taking a chance, or doesn’t; either way, it’s a really dumb move. Teresa Gorman told me this evening (in a taxi coming back from a drinks party at the BBC) that she inherited Morrison’s (woman) agent, who claimed to have been offered money to keep quiet about his activities. It scares, me as all the press know, and as we get closer to the election someone is going to make trouble, very close to her indeed.”

So where did David Icke get his much-repeated quote from?

I ask this as the entry above clearly shows far more explosive revelations.

Namely, Norman Tebbit is named as having been told by Peter Morrison himself that he was a pederast.

Teresa Gorman is named as also being privy to this information.

Morrison’s agent was also alleged to have been paid to keep quiet about his activities.

The diaries were published in 2002 so why has none of this ever surfaced in the media?

Also, if the diaries had been readily available for at least ten years, why would David Icke not bring attention to what was clearly a far more damning revelation on his website in 2012?

It’s not as if it was covered up, or hidden from view, the book had been out there for a decade and a cursory read would have given even the laziest researcher far more.

It should also be noted that Peter Morrison was named by more than one person who identified him as being a visitor at various care homes in North Wales.

Rod Richards, a former Conservative MP and ex-leader of the Welsh Tories, who made the shocking allegation that he had seen evidence linking Sir Peter Morrison to the North Wales children’s homes case, in which up to 650 children in 40 homes were sexually, physically and emotionally abused over 20 years.

DAILY MAIL Former Minister says Thatcher aide Paedophile preyed on boys

So if all these people were privy to this ‘open secret,’ why was nothing done at the time?