All posts tagged BBC

Until this morning, it would have been difficult to think of anything that would cast a darker shadow over the mainstream media in Britain, than what currently exists.

For anyone out there who still believes that the media is not completely skewed, is not agenda-driven, and does not relentlessly push leftish, liberal propaganda, then there really is no hope for them.

The following two images are what would have greeted anyone who was unfortunate enough to have tuned into SkyNews and the BBC over the last couple of days, while covering the State Visit to the UK by US President Donald J. Trump and his family.

May I assure the American readers of this site, that this is NOT something that the normal, right-minded folk of this great country condone or celebrate.

We see it as nothing more than media-driven, state sponsored hate-peddling, entirely abhorrent, and behaviour which is mortally embarrassing to every decent man, woman and child who resides on these islands.

May a plague fall upon all the houses of those who are responsible.

Now that the final results of the European Election are in, it should not come as a surprise to hear and read in the mainstream media – and from the likes of Jeremy Corbyn, Vince Cable, Caroline Lucas and their troops of flying monkeys – that on top of everything else we (the Great British public) are incapable of doing – it appears that we cannot even do basic maths now.

Since the results were announced, the left wing attack dogs and the Liberal Democrat leader Vince Cable, have not been backward in coming forward, gleefully announcing that the result is a clear indication that there is more support for remaining in the European Union, than there is for Brexit.

They appear to be saying that if all the votes for the Remain parties are added together, they show greater numbers than those who were registered as voting for the groups who have campaigned to leave.

Now I don’t know about any of you, but maths is not my strong point, but I can do basic mathematics, and as every smartphone and personal computer has a calculator application, there really is no excuse nowadays.

As the majority of politicians have had the benefit of a private education, and purveyors of the news via any number of mainstream sources have undoubtably attended university, it is somewhat puzzling to ordinary mortals like me, how they have arrived at that conclusion.

If you take a look at the BBC’s own figures, for example, it shows that a little over 2.9 million more votes were cast for leave parties and individuals, and even when you add all the remain figures together, it shows an even larger percentage than the one they lost by in 2016.

Or am I missing something?

As the march towards the complete suppression of Free Speech, independent thought and deed and any alternative to the mainstream narrative of the state gathers pace – would it come as any surprise to learn that the BBC (and undoubtedly other mass media juggernauts), have now started to target those who are seen as the citizenry of the future?

In the following BBC article, published in December last year, it was noted that from this month, Secondary Schools and sixth forms across this country are going to be ‘Targeted’ by BBC Journalists:

in an attempt to go into schools to speak to young people and give them the equipment they need to distinguish between what’s true and what’s false….”

Is it a coincidence that this is being implemented in the same month that a BBC news team was captured on video admitting that they were going to report on a mostly peaceful, non-political march organised by the FLA against terrorism and extremism in the centre of Birmingham, as being an ‘Extreme Right Wing Event’, and which despite the gathering being nothing of the sort, did not prevent other left-wing Anti Racist media outlets and groups labeling it as being:

‘avowedly racist and Islamophobic. The sharp trajectory rightwards that Stand up to Racism has repeatedly warned of was clearly visible’.

So what exactly are the BBC going to be teaching our kids?

How to identify genuine instances of ‘Fake News’ …. or to adhere to the official narrative being peddled by the mass media arm of the state and attack anyone who questions it?

‘The BBC is launching a new scheme to help young people identify real news and filter out fake or false information.

The project is targeted at secondary schools and sixth forms across the UK.

From March, up to 1,000 schools will be offered mentoring in class and online to help them spot so-called fake news.

BBC journalists including Kamal Ahmed, Tina Daheley, Amol Rajan and Huw Edwards will also take part in events aimed at helping students.

James Harding, the director of BBC News, said: “This is an attempt to go into schools to speak to young people and give them the equipment they need to distinguish between what’s true and what’s false.”

The move follows a year-long study, conducted by the University of Salford in conjunction with BBC Newsround, looking at how well children aged between 9 and 14 can spot false information.

Although most of the children from across all age groups said they knew what fake news was, many of them could not always distinguish between fake and real stories when presented with them.’


If anyone wanted to look for an example of misleading and disingenuous reporting, you need to look no further than the recent mass media frenzy over ‘Cheddar Man’.

For those who are still not aware, ‘Cheddar Man’ was/is a 10,000-year-old complete human male skeleton, that was discovered in a cave in the Cheddar Gorge, south west England in 1903.

The reason why the mass media and mainstream scientist have gone into raptures recently, is that DNA testing carried out by the University College of London, using samples extracted by researchers at the Natural History Museum, have allegedly determined that this example of one of the earliest British inhabitants, possessed ‘dark skin, curly black hair and blue eyes’.

So it’s fairly easy to work out, why the mass media and the tame scientific community have been positively wetting themselves over this ‘discovery’.

The BBC, SkyNews, The Guardian, the Independent, the Sun, the Mail, New Scientist, the Washington Post and even the Smithsonian Institute website have run with this story, as well as a number of other ‘news’ outlets, which has understandably attracted a lot of public attention.

However, reading some of those media outpourings, it becomes fairly obvious early on, that most of the articles make very little reference to any actual science, relying instead, upon what has flowed from Science Journalists.

The articles make little or no reference to the fact, that ‘Cheddar Man’ was only one of a large number of human remains discovered in the same area, and, although incomplete, are at least 5-10,000 years older, and were not subjected to similar testing.

So the question must be asked, why is this single example of an early hominid, being promoted in this way, despite the obvious lack of more wide-ranging testing being carried out?

As the video below points out, these latest findings are based on nothing more than ‘Genetic Astrology’, and as such, are not an accurate, or indeed a true representation, of the real ethnicity of the skeleton.


The video accompanying this article, was uploaded to Facebook by Tom Finch, and was taken from the recently screened BBC show ‘Stargazing Live’, which focussed on the highly publicised ‘Space Walk’ of the British astronaut Tim Peake, to repair a broken solar panel on the International Space Station (ISS), which is believed to be currently orbiting the Earth.


The video comprises a short conversation between Dr. Brian Cox and Canadian Astronaut Chris Hadfield, who last year, regaled a worldwide Television and Internet audience with his rendition of the David Bowie Classic ‘Space Oddity’, while orbiting the Earth aboard the ISS.

During that conversation, Hadfield makes some unexpected revelations, that must now surely raise some serious questions.

The video and audio is not the best quality, so I have transcribed the conversation for clarity.

BRIAN COX: “How important is the engineering? That we have learned to build such a large structure in orbit?

CHRIS HADFIELD: “It’s sort of as if a little kid is sailing a sailboat on a pond remotely. At some point, that person starts to sail a sailboat up and down the coast, then they invent and study and learn to figure out all the things they need to do, so that maybe … then someday, they can actually sail out of sight of land. And the station [ISS] has been orbiting the Earth as if … we are sort of … as if we are sailing in sight of land, as we invent … I mean …

What do we make the hull out of?

How do you navigate?

What food do you need?

How do you make a toilet that will work forever?

How do you recycle water?

How do you recycle the oxygen?

It’s the main crucible test that we’ve been trying to grind out all the lessons, that’ll eventually … ‘LET US GO TO THE MOON … AND EVEN FURTHER AWAY!’

By Eddie Boyce 
Kent Freedom Movement
I came across this article this morning in the Zionist controlled BBC and it really brought home to me how far the World has now slipped into a fear based police State in all but name.
Most people reading this know or should that the whole “war on terror” is a monumental fraud now going into it’s murderous unlawful 15th year.

The catalyst for the “War on Terror” was the obvious false flag attacks of 9/11 which were the “new pearl harbour” called for in the Zionist inspired  PNAC (project for a new American Century) document written by dual citizen Jews masquerading as American citizens.

The consequences of this evil plan have been many and far reaching.

The Middle East has seen sovereign Countries bombed back to the stone age and millions of innocent people killed and millions more displaced.

The latest target being the secular Nation of Syria with the Zionist controlled west demanding Assad step down.

This latest attempt to overthrow Syria has seen the rise out of nowhere of a new so called terrorist group named ISIS (they love this ancient Goddess) that is seemingly invincible.
Of course it’s complete nonsense as this ragtag army of Mossad/IDF/mercenaries and useful Muslim idiots are in reality a creation of the Zionist controlled west and they do there bidding in attempting to overthrow Islamic Nation after Nation while leaving Israel and it’s interest well alone.
Just a coincidence nothing to worry about.
Now the politicians and the MSM would have us believe that these “terrorist” are such an unbeatable force that the might of the super power USA army has not been able to stop them even with the help of numerous other Nations.

This is such an insult to people’s intelligence it beggars belief people buy into this nonsense.

In reality ISIS has replaced Al-Qaeda as the latest new and not improved bogey man to frighten the west into continually doing Israel’s bidding and helping with it’s mad long term plan of a “greater Israel”.

Just to make sure the mesmerized masses never see that the only Country who benefits from this criminal madness is Israel. And to keep the west on board with using their armies and paying for the wholesale destruction of the middle east through their taxes they perpetuate false flag attacks from time to time.

The Paris “attacks”

The latest false flag attack was carried out in Paris on November 13th 2015.

I won’t go into too much detail regarding this staged event but if people want to get a comprehensive and accurate account I suggest looking at Brandon Martinez work on YouTube here and his site here for a very good analysis of this latest contrived event which proves without a shadow of doubt the Paris attacks was another in an increasingly long line of false flag terror events perpetuated by criminal western governments and their intertwined “intelligence” agencies.

Naturally the despicable MSM play their part as they constantly ramp up the fear 24/7 while simultaneously not bothering to tell the obvious truth to the people.

It is left to us in the “alternative media” to do our best to reach people to inform them of the whole insidious murderous agenda that even has them in it’s cross-hairs.

So here we are at the start of a New Year (2016) and we have reached a point where this child like but deadly game of World domination is having a detrimental effect on even simple pleasures like welcoming in the new year.

How long this madness continues is really up to humanity and it’s ability to face reality, not the contrived reality of corrupt politicians and the media but reality on the ground.

Do we continue to turn a blind eye to the massive crimes perpetuated by Jewish banksters and their Zionist and Freemasonic stooges embedded into western governments, the media, Wall St and the City of London? or do we finally realise the emperor has no clothes and without our consent and willful ignorance and participation (Military etc) this could be over before the start of 2017 if we so choose.

As ever our actions or inaction’s will answer the above question.

I know the people who are reading this blog are doing there part in exposing the agenda and I would like to thank you for your efforts, they are sorely needed and much appreciated.

I also wish you all a happy, prosperous, healthy and peaceful New Year.

God Bless you all.


It would be difficult to avoid the mainstream media coverage that has been given over to the video recently released by Animal Aid, in regard to the cruelty of three slaughterhouse workers in Yorkshire.

It has been shown on SkyNews, the BBC, ITV and the majority of online and printed newspapers are running the same story.As a result of this, many people who were not aware of what Halal ritual slaughter really involves, are now slowly realising what has been happening

However, what the mainstream media are NOT saying is that the footage they are showing, is not a one-off or isolated incident, and is not even a true representation of the overall picture. A quick internet search will bring up pages and pages of the expected MSM related hits and references, which are all running differently worded versions of the same story as SkyNews and the BBC, which concentrates on this one incident

Which is where most people will stop searching unfortunately.

As an example, the link below can be found on the seventh page of returned hits from Google – which contains additional information from Animal Aid which appears to have not been reported by the MSM.

“This is the tenth slaughterhouse in which we have filmed undercover, and it is the ninth to be caught breaking animal welfare laws.”


Ten Abattoirs where similar undercover filming was carried out?

So taking that as an average, does that also mean that 90% of British slaughterhouses are operating under similar levels of avoidable and needless levels of cruelty?

How many British Abattoirs are also Halal Certified, therefore exempt from European regulations on humane slaughter?

“EU law requires animals for the food chain to be stunned (made unconscious) prior to killing, so that death should be painless. There are exceptions for religious slaughter, notably for Shechita (the Jewish method of killing animals for food – Kosher meat) and Muslim Halal. The Muslim and Jewish communities, totaling nearly 25% of the world population, have similar philosophies in this regard. Their slaughter rituals are deemed so important for their religious observance that outlawing them could be considered an attack on their religions.”


This is what The Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) of the European Food Safety Authority have said:

“When a very large transverse incision is made across the neck a number of vital tissues are transected including: skin, muscle, trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries, jugular veins, major nerve trunks (e.g. vagus and phrenic nerves) plus numerous minor nerves. Such a drastic cut will inevitably trigger a barrage of sensory information to the brain in a sensible (conscious) animal… such a massive injury would result in very significant pain and distress in the period before insensibility supervenes.

“The Council considers that slaughter without pre-stunning is unacceptable and that the Government should repeal the current Halal exemption.”

“Cuts which are used in order that rapid bleeding occurs involve substantial tissue damage in areas well-supplied with pain receptors. The rapid decrease in blood pressure which follows the blood loss is readily detected by the conscious animal and elicits extreme fear and panic. Poor welfare also results when conscious animals inhale blood because of bleeding into the trachea. Without stunning, the time between cutting through the major blood vessels and insensibility, as deduced from behavioural and brain response, is up to 20 seconds in sheep, up to 25 seconds in pigs, up to 2 minutes in cattle, up to 2½ or more minutes in poultry, and sometimes 15 minutes or more in fish”


Halal slaughter requires the animal be bled out while still alive and aware and in agony.

It leaves the slaughtered meat filled with toxins (including Adrenaline) released at the moment of death, as the blood is removed while the animal is dying and therefore is not present in sufficient quantities to remove the remaining toxins.

The animals have to watch their unfortunate companions die during each blood letting festival, smelling their fear and raising their own stress levels. These stress chemicals “marinate” the meat in hormones known to raise levels of aggression and violence in nearly all mammal species (which includes humans of course).

It allows for a surprising range of cooking methods, including even some “tar tar” dishes (raw or nearly raw), allowing both diseases and the released chemicals and hormones that were not removed by the ritual slow bloodletting practice and half-measured cooking, to be freely spread.


“On the 24th January 1965, Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill died.

As the British Mainstream Media and establishment-funded ie: ‘Tame’ historians, still appear to be reluctant to publish and promote anything other than a pre-scripted, sanitised, and altogether inaccurate depiction – on this, the 50th Anniversary of the death of Winston Churchill, the Outlaw seeks to redress the balance by re-publishing the following article, which originally appeared here on July 13th 2013″.


Our current crop of Westminster politicians have now decided that their tame educators must now place more emphasis on teaching children ‘real’ history in a more practical manner in schools.

An indication that finally, British schools are going to be shaken out of their sleeplike, propaganda-laden and heavily-censored teaching methods perhaps?

Sadly it appears not, as one of the suggested subjects is the life and achievements of Winston Churchill, who topped the table in a BBC programme ‘The 100 Greatest Britons’ which was first aired in 2002.

The programme nominated who they considered to be ‘Great Britons’ and encouraged the viewer to vote accordingly.

It should come as no surprise that Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, DL, FRS Hon RA (1874-1965) topped that list, as (especially in the media and politics) Winston Churchill has long been celebrated as the definitive ‘Greatest Briton’.

So what is it that made this aristocratic war correspondent, author and military officer, who became First Lord of the Admiralty and wartime Prime Minister following the resignation of Neville Chamberlain in 1940, such a paragon of ‘Britishness?’

And why is he so heavily promoted by mainstream historians and the establishment? (Who incidentally have been entwined since written history has been set down for posterity.)

Was it because he behaved very aggressively towards striking workers in the General Strike of 1926, using the same methods he had used in south Wales between 1910 and 1911?

Was it because he will be forever remembered as a hammer of the workers who sent troops and tanks against the unarmed striking Mineworkers in South Wales?

Or could it be that he had rejected Adolf Hitler’s proposal to spare civilian targets, preferring instead to provoke the German leader into bombing London by ordering the Royal Air Force to attack Berlin and various civilian targets first?

It is worth remembering that Hitler in fact, had made very generous offers of peace that many people in England were more than willing to accept, which if successful, would have meant the often-referred to ‘Holocaust’ may not have occurred.

“During the first two years of the war, when the German authorities made efforts to secure the exodus of the Jews from the Reich and from Nazi occupied territory, it was Churchill & the British Government which took the lead in barring the escape routes from Europe against Jewish refugees.”Bernard Wasserstein.

So was it his blocking of the Red Cross from accurately monitoring and recording civilian casualties, which before the end of September 1940, numbered among the dead more than 7000 in London alone, including 700 children that made him a Great Briton?

Or maybe it was the deliberate misreporting of the true number of fatalities, which, by the end of the war some 60,000 British and 650,000 German Civilians had perished due to both German & Allied ‘strategic’ bombing attacks?

Churchill himself described the Second World War as the “most unnecessary war in history,” which was an uncannily accurate statement considering his true loyalties were to bankers in the City of London who had covered his stock market gambling losses and also saved his beloved home at Chartwell from foreclosure.

But that could not have been the reason that Churchill played such a major part in involving Britain in the second largest conflict in human history could it?

There are nowadays, greater numbers of historians who believe that the Second World War was instigated to be another step towards a program, which in the long-term means to enslave humanity in a world dictatorship run solely by these London-based monopoly capitalists.

These Megalomaniacs start and perpetuate wars simply to increase their wealth and power and to manipulate, reshape and further brutalise the societies they already control financially, under the guise of carefully managed ‘Patriotism’.

The ongoing “War on Terror” for example, was always intended to make us forfeit our civil rights and steer us towards yet another unnecessary war, but this time against Islam.

One of the lesser-known facts about Winston Churchill is that his maternal grandfather was Leonard Jerome (formerly Jacobson, 1818-1891) a speculator and business partner of August Belmont (nee Schoenberg 1813-1890), who was the Rothschild family’s main American representative.

Even his often written about ‘drive’ has been attributed to the fact his parents neglected him and taught him that love has to be earned in terms of how the world saw him.

But was it simply because he wanted to avenge his father whose political career/life was cut short by syphilis?

He was also one of the coldest and narcissistic personalities that his contemporaries had ever encountered.

His rise to power was assisted by his mother’s connections with the Rothschild’s, including the powerful banker Ernest Cassell and not by the peerless leadership qualities his biographers wax lyrically about.

In the 1930’s, he became a lobbyist, promoting “The Focus Group,” which was led by the Zionist chairman of British Shell, Sir Robert Waley-Cohen.

Churchill later became the main barrier of “appeasement” and eventually the biggest opponent to making peace with Hitler.

It would not have benefited what was after all, his involvement in a plan ‘to absorb the world’s wealth’ would it?

So was he a merely a controlled and charismatic leader who was seen as the only person capable of leading the people of this country into an ill-advised and extremely costly all-out conflict with Germany?

It now seems highly likely that Hitler had angered those who Churchill served by printing his own money, which of course meant that they had lost control of both him and their plan of using Germany to further their vision of world domination.

As Churchill’s own words to Lord Robert Boothby clearly state:

“Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war, was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.”



So the wide-awake and ever vigilant British population appears to have got exactly what it wanted, with it’s interweb petitions and relentless pressure brought about by countless millions of furious key presses and #hashtag publishing on social media.

“Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”Galatians VI

It has ‘forced’ the Home Secretary Teresa May and the Government to announce a wide-ranging enquiry into how allegations of child abuse by politicians and other powerful institutions, like the NHS, the BBC and the Church during the 1970s, 1980s and the 1990s were handled.

Retired Judge Baroness Butler-Sloss, has been appointed to head this enquiry, as the incumbent guests at Downing Street have told you that Baroness Butler-Sloss “commands widespread respect and confidence”.

Phew! I was worried then for a while who was going to be in charge.

Putting aside the fact that her late brother Sir Michael Havers was Attorney General during the 1980s, and was suspected as being among those who made the Dossier presented to Home Secretary Sir Leon Brittan, by Geoffrey Dickens MP, ‘disappear’.

Butler-Sloss has assured the BBC she was unaware of her brother’s link to the controversy and said she will not resign, despite increasing objections to her appointment.

“I know absolutely nothing about it,” she said. “If people think I am not suitable, then that’s up to them.”

(She says it like you actually have a choice)

The same Butler-Sloss that was forced to make a public apology to the House of Lords on Febuary 28, 2013 for wrongly claiming Fathers4Justice made death threats against her.

The same Butler-Sloss that, until June 2007, chaired the inquests into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales, and Dodi Fayed.

She stood down from that date, the task being completed by Lord Justice Scott Baker.

No satisfactory explanation was ever given, although it remains an open question, as to whether it was Mohammed Al-Fayed’s Judicial Review, on the grounds that the inquest should not be conducted without a jury was responsible.

A jury, made up of members of the public could have stood a very good chance of finding that the deaths were not an ‘accident’, but that is pure speculation and of course should not be seriously considered as a valid reason for doing so.

What were you thinking?

Butler-Sloss was also responsible for granting life-long anonymity to John Venables and Robert Thompson, the brutal killers of Liverpool toddler James Bulger, upon their release in 2001, in case you were not aware.

So a perfect solution then, and one that will undoubtably inspire confidence among the majority of Tabloid Reading, MSM news viewing and clearly brain dead Social Media using members of the British public

Pay no attention to the dissenting voices heard among some MPs and the Alternative Media, who can clearly identify yet another cover-up to add to the already long list of cover-ups and suppression of the truth.



If I was a cynical type, I could think that there were certain parties on Social Media, who’s sole intention was to force the Government to announce this enquiry, and were somehow complicit and had full knowledge of an enquiry of this type having the obvious need and the power to bury the evidence.


This morning, my attention was drawn to a short Twitter exchange that appeared on my timeline.

The Conservative ex-Junior Health Minister, Edwina Currie, was asked a question which referred, (I assume) to the recent revelations that it may soon become a legal requirement to report any instances of Child Abuse.

Ms Currie was then asked “Wouldn’t the paedophile MP Peter Morrison had been convicted if you and other MP’s had reported him as a Noted Pedarist.”

To which Ms Currie replied “But you need evidence. dates, times, places, names. I had none, nothing. But that’s the label he carried.”

I then asked her “That did not prevent you from using the very same ‘unproven’ information to promote your book, eh Edwina?”

I received no response, at the time of writing.

I felt that question was justified as on the 25th November 2012, David Icke published a widely reproduced extract from Edwina Currie’s Diaries 1987-1992 on his website, in which she outed Peter Morrison as a ‘noted pederast’:

DAVID ICKE HEADLINES 25th November 2012

Reproductions of the same quote can only be found online, on various forums and blogs, so I needed a definitive version.

Copies of Edwina Currie’s Diaries 1987-1992 can easily be sourced online, I did a quick search on both Amazon and eBay and found copies available from £0.01 and up to £11.01 for the hardback edition.


On page 195 of the hardback edition, it reads, verbatim:

“One appointment in the recent reshuffle has attracted a lot of gossip and could be very dangerous: Peter Morrison has become the PM’s PPS. Now he’s what they call a ‘noted pederast’, with a liking for young boys; he admitted as much to Norman Tebbit when he became deputy chairman of the party but added’ ‘However, I’m very discreet’ – and he must be! She either knows and is taking a chance, or doesn’t; either way, it’s a really dumb move. Teresa Gorman told me this evening (in a taxi coming back from a drinks party at the BBC) that she inherited Morrison’s (woman) agent, who claimed to have been offered money to keep quiet about his activities. It scares, me as all the press know, and as we get closer to the election someone is going to make trouble, very close to her indeed.”

So where did David Icke get his much-repeated quote from?

I ask this as the entry above clearly shows far more explosive revelations.

Namely, Norman Tebbit is named as having been told by Peter Morrison himself that he was a pederast.

Teresa Gorman is named as also being privy to this information.

Morrison’s agent was also alleged to have been paid to keep quiet about his activities.

The diaries were published in 2002 so why has none of this ever surfaced in the media?

Also, if the diaries had been readily available for at least ten years, why would David Icke not bring attention to what was clearly a far more damning revelation on his website in 2012?

It’s not as if it was covered up, or hidden from view, the book had been out there for a decade and a cursory read would have given even the laziest researcher far more.

It should also be noted that Peter Morrison was named by more than one person who identified him as being a visitor at various care homes in North Wales.

Rod Richards, a former Conservative MP and ex-leader of the Welsh Tories, who made the shocking allegation that he had seen evidence linking Sir Peter Morrison to the North Wales children’s homes case, in which up to 650 children in 40 homes were sexually, physically and emotionally abused over 20 years.

DAILY MAIL Former Minister says Thatcher aide Paedophile preyed on boys

So if all these people were privy to this ‘open secret,’ why was nothing done at the time?