Agenda

All posts tagged Agenda

I have been watching with interest, the online insanity surrounding the one-time East17 vocalist Brian Harvey, but have, until now, not allowed myself to be dragged into any of it.

This will be my only contribution, and it comes by way of offering some timely advice.

My advice to Brian Harvey, would be to ignore all of the self-titled ‘Targeted Individuals’, and those who have attached themselves to him in order to boost their own Youtube Channels & social media presence – and also to ignore the detractors and those who he describes as ‘trolls’ – and to concentrate on the bigger picture.

I would then ask him to take some time out (37:02 minutes in real time), and watch the following videos, which will I believe, furnish him with everything he would need to answer most of the questions he has been asking, especially in regard to how he ended up in his current situation.

They explain, in simple terms, not only why, but how it was done, and most importantly, by whom.

Putting all personal feelings aside, as I don’t really care whether Brian Harvey likes me, or trusts my judgement, as it’s unimportant in the greater scheme of things.

What is important, however, is that the truth is not allowed to be bypassed by the endless back and forth between various parties and online groups, and to cut through the white noise that has effectively drowned out any attempt at reasoned discussion, and forge a positive way forward.

These videos were put together by someone who’s work I am aware of via his blog and his Youtube channel, but that is as far as any association between us goes.

It is my belief that Brian Harvey was not only set up, (as the videos clearly show), but he was also both professionally and socially crucified by people within the British political establishment, working towards a pre-determined agenda, assisted by his manager and willingly abetted by the mainstream media.

It’s now up to the reader/viewer to decide for themselves where the truth lies.

The following article expands upon ‘Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression’ by David Martin, and what it contains may prove helpful to anyone who not only values the truth, but has grown sick of the endless lies, and the disinformation being disseminated, both online and in the mass media – and wishes to identify instances of when the truth is being suppressed.

Whenever an instance of ‘wickedness in high places’ is revealed, or any publicized event in the mass media, for example, becomes subject to the inevitable cries of ‘Conspiracy’ in certain quarters, it is, for the average person, notoriously difficult to ascertain where the truth actually lies.

If said event is in any way suspicious, or does not appear how it has been presented, by the mass media for instance, there is a fair chance that there is a disinformation campaign, launched against those attempting to find the truth, running alongside it.

I am not saying that every single event that has been, and is currently being reported upon in the mass media is a ‘False Flag’, but there are almost certainly some events that have been ‘staged’ or ‘made to happen’ for any number of reasons (more often than not with a political motive).

There are specific tactics which professional (or even amateur) disinformation artists tend to apply, and hopefully, there will be a number of points in this article which will be helpful in identifying both those responsible for disseminating the disinformation, and indeed their motives for doing so.

It may also be helpful to understand, that when genuine seekers of the truth are attempting to navigate any available information, they will always try to present facts, and will construct their argument based on that, as well as any solid evidence that they have been able to discover.

It should also be noted that this can be a largely experimental process, although it may be based on careful observation and meticulous research, there is also a degree of trial and error involved, so is therefore extremely vulnerable to attack, and when any disinformation artist worth their wages can do the greatest harm.

Some, if not all of these 25 rules can be observed everywhere, in the mass media, through political debate, on television shows, the internet via websites, forums and social media through to what appear to be innocuous and random comments on a blog.

Keep your eyes and ears open, and continue to question everything.

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth

The Rules of Disinformation by H. Michael Sweeney.

© 1997 All Rights Reserved

Permission to reprint/distribute this information hereby granted for any non commercial use, provided the information is reproduced in its entirety and with author information intact.

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.

Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it – especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant.

Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme.

This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumour mongers.

Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as simply being rumours and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent media, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumours”. If you can weigh up the material against what can be found on the Internet, use this to certify it as a “wild rumour” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man.

Find or create an element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack any opponents with name calling and ridicule.

This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “nutter”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “racist”, “fascist”, “terrorist”, “conspiracy theorist”, “radical”, “militiant”, “religious fanatics”, “paedophiles”, “Paedo protectors” and so forth. This makes others back away from supporting anyone out of fear of gaining the same label, and therefore, avoid dealing with the issues.

6. Hit and Run.

On any publicly accessible forum, make a brief attack on the opponent or the opponent’s position, and then run away before a response can be fielded, or simply ignore the answer. This works extremely well on the Internet and in letters-to-the-editor environments, where a steady stream of new (‘Sock’) identities can be called upon, without having to explain criticism or reasoning – simply make an accusation or launch another type of attack, never discuss the issues, and never respond to any subsequent responses, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives.

Twist or amplify any fact which could imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority.

Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and clever words to illustrate you are “someone who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating why, or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb.

No matter what evidence or logical argument is presented, avoid discussing the issues with denial, claim that they have no credibility, claim they do not make any sense, claim they do not provide proof, claim they make no point, claim they have no logic, or do not support any conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate your opponent with old news.

A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues – so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions.

Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution.

Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime or event, and the multitude of players, and paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic.

Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions.

Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions.

This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses.

If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject.

Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents.

If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs.

This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence.

Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call for an Inquiry, a Grand Jury, a Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body.

Subvert any process to your benefit, and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you control the prosecuting lawyer, it can insure a Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed and becomes unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth.

Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions.

If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics.

If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish.

If you are a key holder (Gatekeeper) of secrets or are otherwise getting unwanted attention, and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, leave the kitchen.

 

There are numerous groups of people, who’s status and position in any society, depends entirely on the continuation of many centuries of deception, duplicity and propaganda, which has served to keep the majority of the human race in a perpetual state of blissful ignorance.

A state of invisibly controlled, but forcefully managed equilibrium that must, and will be preserved and protected at all costs.

Human nature being what it is, however, meant that there would invariably come a time when people gradually began to feel that things were not as they appeared on the surface, and started questioning what they were being told daily and had been taught to them throughout their whole lives.

Science, media, technology, religion, education, sport and even entertainment and music, had been very carefully stage-managed in all manner of subtle ways, to ensure that the vast majority of the human race would never fully, for want of a better description – ‘wake up’, and various safeguards were put in place from the start….

Just in case.

It is one of these ‘Safeguards’, that is the subject of this article.

What is known from history is that during the 1950’s there was a type of ‘mass-awakening’, the true reasons for this eludes me at the present time, but it was during that decade that the American Central Intelligence Agency and the British Security Services, began working with studios in Hollywood to produce movies focusing primarily, on invasions from outer space.

‘Science Fiction’ had became immensely popular during this post-war period, but the Sci-Fi genre had already been established when Mary Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein became the first recognised example in 1818.

When ‘new’ technologies, such as electricity, the telegraph and new forms of powered transport were introduced, writers such as H.G. wells and Jules Verne had also began to produce work that became popular across a wide section of society.

Wells’ 1898 Novel ‘War of the worlds’ for example, introduced the idea of a Martian Invasion into late Victorian England, complete with futuristic weaponry, which was the seminal depiction of an alien invasion of planet earth.

It was not even seen as an entirely fictional concept either, as in 1917, it was spoken about openly by John Dewey, Professor of Philosophy at Columbia University who said:

“Someone remarked that the best way to unite all the nation’s on this globe, would be an attack from some other planet. In the face if such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose.”

General Douglas MacArthur, told assembled cadets at West Point during a speech in 1955:

“The next war will be an Interplanetary war. The nation’s of the earth must someday make a common front for Attack by people from other planets.”

MacArthur made similar speeches on a few occasions, not just once and he was only one of many prominent military and political figures who have done likewise.

Who can forget the speech made by Ronald Reagan in 1987 to the United Nations, where he too, spoke openly about an ‘Alien Invasion?’

He made at least four other similar speeches, as well as making numerous public statements during his tenure as US President, including a much publicised meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev where the issue was discussed.

Were these men deluded?

Conspiracy theorists even?

Or were they making the world aware of an agenda in plain sight of the whole world?

Where they introducing into the public consciousness, the idea that one day, this would actually happen, or were they part of the Strong Delusion?

The alien agenda was based around an ‘Invasion’ that was going to be staged by sophisticated methods, simultaneously around the world, a short time after an Artefact of ‘unknown origin’ had been discovered, complete with a massive amount of media coverage of the event.

This ‘Artifact’ was going to be discovered either in the Antarctic, or as is more likely now, in one of the ancient cities in or around the Middle East, possibly Iraq, Syria or possibly Egypt.

The subsequent invasion, following of course the inevitable build up via the mainstream media to ramp up the tension, was then going to be used to establish a world government, one which may even follow the script of a movie like ‘The Day The Earth Stood Still’ or something similar.

Too far fetched perhaps?

You may already have noticed, like I have, the increasing amount of ‘Alien’ related not so-subliminal imagery, which has started to appear in advertising and Television programmes, which may also be an indication of what we should expect.

The ‘Alien Agenda’ was probably conceived by one of the high level think-tanks which is believed to control world events, like the Club of Rome or something similar, but has now been superseded by the entirely man made Global Warming myth as the method being used to ‘unify’ the world.

Or that may just be a precursor to the ultimate goal, the plans for which have been in place for more than a century.

The Agenda is still being used regularly as an psychological tool against those who are just waking up to the truth.

It has also proved to be an effective method of covering up the very real fact, that various governments have had the technology, and have been building anti-gravity planes for decades – completely relying on the already instilled idea that anyone who sees one assumes it must be an alien craft of some description.

The Agenda has even started appearing in mainstream media outlets such as the Discovery Channel and the History Channel over the last few years, and has also been reported on by major newspapers, giving it an extra layer of ‘respectability’.

Incidentally, many of the larger and better-known UFO groups are entirely funded by the United Nations, up to and including the ‘Disclosure Project’, which receives it’s funding directly from the Rockefeller family.

So of course, they have the wherewithal to spread a whole lot of disinformation thoughout the ranks of those within the so-called Alternative Media, or various ‘Truth’ movements with relative ease for example.

Versions of the agenda have also been heavily promoted by Zechariah Sitchen and authors such as Immanuel Velikovski and Erich Von Däniken who hypothesise that extraterrestrial events supposedly played a significant role in ancient human history.

This has instilled the belief in many people, that following any ‘invasion’ we would be fighting vast numbers of technologically advanced creatures, which in fact created us in the first place, so therefore, we are effectively powerless to do anything to oppose them.

Because how can you possibly fight and ultimately destroy the very beings who created you?

It is worth remembering that one of the largest and certainly the most bizarre disinformation campaigns within the whole truth movement, is based around this theory, so that may also explain a great deal of what is going on there.

You also cannot fail to have noticed some of the more prominent ‘Truthers’ like Michael Tsarion, Jordon Maxwell and others, are openly promoting this theory as ‘fact’, so it should also then register that these people are also manipulating your perception of reality, albeit on a subconscious level.

When you also become aware that Jordon Maxwell was also responsible for mentoring none other than David Icke, who has continued promoting the self-same theories and agenda’s – with some men in the moon and space lizards thrown in for good measure, you start to see the bigger picture.

Icke and many other prominent figures in the ‘truth’ movement, have very successfully tapped into the belief that a large percentage of the western world have been completely fascinated – by a concept that has been around for decades, and therefore, they must also be aware that this ‘Alien Agenda’ was originally a propaganda exercise designed to get people to believe in the possibility of an actual alien invasion.

So it’s entirely possible that they are in some way, an integral part of the deception, or are unaware of the real agenda and are simply profiting from it.

However….

Despite the simple fact there has been no verifiable evidence presented thus far that aliens from outer space have visited this planet, are presently here on earth, or expected any time soon, it is in no way beyond the realms of possibility that this planet has at one time, been host to many other species.

Nor is it certain that some clearly earth born entities, did not only originate elsewhere, but have also played a substantial role in world affairs.

But that’s another story….

Wild speculation and rumours, in the absence of hard facts, are everywhere at the moment, especially in regard to the recent spate of ‘unusual’ weather patterns, we in the UK have been experiencing.

Everything from weather manipulation and witchcraft, through to the foretold arrival of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, are among the stories being discussed in various corners of the internet.

Only one I feel, is worthy of further investigation however.

It has been an open secret among the locals for a few months now, that a ‘secret’ facility, has been constructed in west Wales that, on the surface, bears a startling resemblance to H.A.A.R.P. installations that have appeared in other parts of the world.

At the time of writing, this has NOT been 100% confirmed, but I am not dismissing it altogether either.

Wales can be a very weird place at times, mid and north Wales in particular have been host to all types of weird and not so wonderful events for centuries, so it would be foolish to rule anything out.

“The facility, just outside Aberystwyth in west Wales covering several acres with arrays that send up microwaves into the stratosphere and warm up the upper air to disturb our normal weather pattern.

Combined with the ‘Chemtrails’ that we have seen all over the UK for the last several years which contain metal particles that may produce a reaction to the magnetic waves produced by the HAARP facility to cause massive rainfall, high winds and even earthquakes.”


*ADDENDUM: The facility has been open since 1990. See Comment below.*

Psychiatry on the whole is a fraud…… From whatever angle you try to look at it.

The 300 or so classified ‘disorders’ listed in the bible of psychiatry, are invented by committees from pre-selected menus of behaviour patterns.

That list of ‘Disorders’ is increasing by the day

It’s a crooked, grubby and incestous relationship between the profession of psychiatry and the cash generating drug industry.

It’s a drug-dealing machine, and almost all the drugs they peddle are toxic and dangerous.

Not one mental ‘disorder’ has ever, in any patient, been verified by a physical, chemical or biological test.

That is because there are no tests.

When you understand that, it is a simple matter to start thinking that the process of diagnosing people with these labels means they can easily be debilitated by chemicals.

That makes any nation weaker.

That scrambles people’s brains.

That sedates people.

That makes people easier to control.

Looking at it from another viewpoint, if a person is ‘diagnosed’ their thoughts and ideas are no longer considered ‘legitimate.’

And you did read that correctly…

Diagnosis is a clever method of disabling original thoughts and ideas.

If a person is considered mentally healthy, then his thoughts and ideas have power.

Therefore a ‘diagnosis’ renders any such power null and void.

Effectively silencing those who have become ‘dangerous’ to the plan.

That may well be the reason you never hear talk in the media about mental ‘wellness’.

It is not good for the controllers to publish a list of mental wellness.

It doesn’t work for them.

They need more diagnoses of mental disorders.

They need more people focusing on their own mental and emotional problems.

They need more “disorder” talk on television.

They need people to accept the notion that they are all, in some way, “disordered.”

That’s the deception and that’s how it works.

There was a time when nobody was diagnosed with anything and the world was much better off.

These days it seems everybody is diagnosed with something, and things are much worse as if you hadn’t noticed.

The gradual increases in ‘diagnosed’ levels of mental illness runs parallel with the gradual and deliberate reduction of nutrients in the food supply.

Coupled with the amount of toxic chemicals and psychotropic drugs in the urban water supplies it is not that surprising if you take time to think about it.

There is a reason for is, and it’s a simple one…. Control.

You put more and people under that system and they fall into line.

Classic ‘Fear Politics’.

They develop a different concept of their lives.

It’s all about giving people lower expectations.

But you just cannot come out and tell people to lower their sights, you have to give them a reason.

And psychiatry is one of those reasons.

It’s just one more faked science, and a fraud.

There will be a lot of new ‘disorders’ in the future, involving words like “non-empathic.”

People who don’t have sympathy for others who are diagnosed with mental illnesses will then be given their own label.

Can you see the plan now?

In the very near future, everyone (except the leaders of course) will need adjusting.

The list of disorders will expand on a massive scale, as will the drugs.

This is the basic lie, and the propaganda will tell you that “so much more is understood these days, so we must diagnose everyone who was previously undiagnosed”.

There are very few true mental ‘disorders’.

Those are very serious in nature and of course should never be compared with the fictitious disorders that are so prevalent today.

But even these can be treated by wholly natural methods, which of course have been aggressively suppressed by the medical and pharmaceutical industries.

People do suffer, they experience pain, they may become confused, they may have severe nutritional deficits, they may be toxified, they may be under the heel of political repression, but most are not mentally ill.

They never were.

It is a simple as that, the ‘professionals’ step in and make decisions based on a fabricated science and then prescribe the chemical ‘solution’.

You can submit or just say no.

The Buzz word is DISORDER.

“If you’re not for the new order, you are disordered.”

Throughout history, fraudulently diagnosed mental infirmity has been used as an effective method to silence dissent.

Because it works……

Further reading:
VEGHUNTER


Many examples of how the world’s history has been twisted to fit a globalist agenda, can be found among the masses of documentation held at the Internet Archive.

Were you aware for example, that as late as 1943, three and a half years into the second world war and a full eleven years after Adolf Hitler first rose to power, there were still 10,000 Jews living openly and freely in Berlin, many married to German women?

Such details clearly demolish the allied propaganda, and so they have been hidden away from inquisitive eyes.

It is also interesting to note that whilst living in Hitler’s Berlin, large numbers of Jews were allowed to go about their business unhindered.

However, had they been of Japanese descent and living in the United States, or Italians living in the UK, all would have been rounded up; men, women and children; orphans and the offspring of mixed marriages, and confined to concentration camps or deported as ‘enemy aliens’.

Clearly it was healthier to be a Jew in Berlin, 1943 than it was to be the unfortunate product of a Japanese-American marriage!

The question that could also be asked, should be: “If Hitler’s real intention was to exterminate the Jews, why then had he given them every assistance to emigrate throughout his tenure?”

I have found no reliable and truthful evidence that satisfactorily explains, that years after the  pogroms began, some 120,000 Jews had every opportunity and assistance to leave the country, and had in fact, refused to do so.

It is a matter of public record, that by 1939, 400,000 resident Jews in Germany had received every assistance, compensation and training to re-settle elsewhere… the island of Madagascar being the initial destination set aside for the purpose.

This was all done in the open and with the full agreement of Jewish organisations.

Other countries had a program of assisted emigration, not just for Jews, but for their own nationals too.

The French for example, long before the outbreak of war, was planning the emigration of 10,000 Jews.

Emigration was a normal means of population dispersal, and was practiced by most countries of which it can safely be said that Britain led from the front.

It is important to remember that at this time and for a long time afterwards, the great shipping companies of the world were making enormous profits from the government-subsidized emigration of British nationals to the United States and the Dominions.

These included 130,000 British children, many of them without parents, even newborn babies!

They were taken from orphanages and care wards and against their wishes and often without the knowledge of parents, where they had them, forced to leave their homeland and often settled in institutions where they were to suffer every kind of abuse and deprivation.

Many were lied to and told that they had no parents; often split from their brothers and sisters.

This forced expulsion of our country’s children, and including some adults too, is a shameful stain on history and it even raises the question that the Third Reich’s policy of re-settlement was a great deal more enlightened than was Britain’s.

This enforced re-settlement of children without parents, unbelievably continued until 1967 and is still cloaked in a veil of secrecy to this day.

CURTIS BROWN

It is also useful to take some time, and to reflect that whilst the British government of the time, using a combination of deception and financial inducements, (£10 assisted passages to Australia) were draining orphanages of unwanted British children, they were simultaneously assisting the colonisation of Britain by West Indians and others from far-flung territories.

WITNESS TO HISTORY

I like David Icke. I have respect for the man, and I shall tell you why that is.

When I met him, he was courteous, compassionate, knowledgeable and he listened. We spoke at length for a few hours, and there was no front, no agenda and no bullshit. He met with me alone, no entourage, no cameras, no nauseating sycophants telling me where to sit or stand or speak. He was armed only with a notebook and pen, he drinks tea, he laughs at things that are funny and he is human!

Plus: he was as good as his word, as he proved later..

In my book, that ticks all the boxes, I do not suffer fools nor scam artists easily, I do not entertain personal agenda’s, political double-speak or nodding acceptance…

That is why I like David Icke.

But as for the people who hang onto his coat tails, that is a completely different matter. The so-called ‘Eyes-Wide-Open’ Conspiracy Theorists who congregate like Jackals in and around the David Icke Forums have got to be experienced to be believed.

If you are new to the forum, you will be ridiculed, if you dare to post anything of value, it will be torn apart like a fallen Wildebeest in the Khalahari, until the skeletal remains of your opinions are left to disintegrate under a merciless sun.

I have posted on there quite a lot, and apart from some notable exceptions, have met with nothing but scorn and dismissal from self-important, territorial and rather juvenile ‘Veteran’ Forum members.

That in itself would not ordinarily be a problem, but the blinkered and dismissive attitudes serve only to enhance their arrogance.

They ridicule Social Media with terms like ‘Twatter’, and make ludicrous claims to be the font of any and all information that concerns the life of Jimmy Savile. It is staggeringly tedious trawling through the duplicated information and regurgitated photographs, that, as they arrogantly claim, is ‘The Biggest Child Abuse Forum’ on the Internet.

The thread, incidentally was started not long after the Jimmy Savile Revelations by the now *cough* deceased and very much admired (on the DI Forums anyway) Anders7777, who would doubtless have something to say about the direction the thread is heading.

(If of course he was alive that is, which many forum members insist he is not.)

The ‘Largest’ Child Abuse thread, “The Wounded Healer Journal”, has been online since 1995, and is the ‘Go To’ place for victims and Professionals worldwide if it’s a matter of ‘Numbers’ as is so often discussed on Forums and blogs.

I have watched with anger as genuine victims of CSA, have been savaged over their understandably cloudy recollections of dates, times and notable ‘names’ etc.

It takes tremendous courage and inner strength for any victim of abuse to come forward, let alone on a worldwide stage like the Internet, and being subjected to the kind of hostility they meet with on the DI Forums, is nothing short of being abused all over again..

I cannot think of anyone in the public eye during Savile’s life that has not been mentioned at one time or another… Clutching at straws is the kinder description of my preferred choice of words in regard to the whole thread.

If, as they so proudly state, that the ‘Spooks’ are regular visitors, then I assure you they are pissing themselves over the amount of blind alleys being painstakingly scrutinised.

I will not believe that the DI Forums, are, although they share his name in any way connected to the views and opinions of the man himself..