Are certain abilities given to Rh-negative individuals as a condition of their blood type?
Do people with Rh-negative blood possess greater psychic abilities?
Do they posses a genetic factor entirely separate from this planet, and that they are, in some way descended from a crossover of humans and a kind of ‘cosmic astronaut.’?
In its barest sense, when an alien life force is merged with human DNA, does it create a human with extra sensory power that can lend itself to greater psychic ability?
Are Rh-positive individuals not as ‘Tuned In’ because they are descended from rhesus monkeys that have no link to the cosmic influences?
Genetics alone cannot explain the Rh-negative factor, as genes are hereditary, although some theorists state that the Rh factor was a ‘mutation’ which was then passed on.
That particular theory, however, has no basis in fact.
One of the only real ‘facts’ we have, is that there is no definitive proof where the negative Rh factor actually originated.
Of the human blood types, Type ‘O’ is the most common.
In it’s Rhesus Negative presentation it is the universal blood type and can be donated to any recipient regardless of their group or type.
All Blood types are either ….
RHESUS NEGATIVE (-) and RHESUS POSITIVE (+).
This is known as the RH factor.
The RH factor is the rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) factor.
The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is directly related to the Rhesus Monkey.
When a blood type is inherited from one’s parents, it is now accepted that the Rhesus factor element of the blood is the most consistent of human characteristics that passed on to you, the offspring by your parents.
There are VERY few aberrations.
Blood rarely, if ever changes, nor does it ‘Mutate‘.
The greater majority of people on earth, ‘Officially‘ 85% of the world’s population, have Rh-positive bloodtypes.
That could and does support the universally-taught (although false) ‘Evolutionary’ theory that humans evolved from, or were derived from Primates.
Yet 15 % of the remainder have Rh-negative blood, which science has never been able to explain.
(40/45% of indigenous Europeans are known to be Rh-Negative, but overall, it is now thought that the actual numbers of Rh-Negatives are nearer 7% of the world’s population).
So does that number support the theory that they originated elsewhere?
If a person’s blood type is one of least mutable human characteristics, where on earth did the Rh-Negative come from?
That question has puzzled scientists, medical professionals and freelance researchers for many decades.
There is some documentary evidence, however, that does suggest the Rh-Negative blood type may have appeared on earth around 35,000 years ago.
Around the same time that the Neanderthals ‘disappeared’.
And Cro-Magnon ‘appeared’.
The appearance of Rhesus Negative blood also appeared to be regional, sporadic and also seemed to be connected with certain groups/tribes of people.
Northern Spain and Southern France is where some of the highest concentration of the Rh-Negative factor can be found, more specifically in the Basque peoples of northern Spain.
Another original Rh-Negative group are known to be among the Eastern/Oriental Jews.
Generally, about 40 – 45% of Europeans have the Rh-negative bloodtype, around 3% are of African descent and approximately 1% of people of Asian or Native American descent.
Due to the larger European numbers, is that where Rhesus Negative blood was introduced into the human genetic code?
Could this also be when the Caucasian was also introduced?
And could this also mean that the introduction of the Caucasian is related to the Rh-Negative factor?
If the Rh-Negative factor is a ‘normal’ presentation of blood, then why would there a problem when an Rh-Negative mother becomes impregnated with an Rh-Positive baby?
Hemolytic disease, is actually an allergic reaction, but it can cause death for the unborn child when the two different blood types are mixed during pregnancy and birth, without medical intervention.
When the antigenic substances in the mother’s blood attacks the Rh-Positive blood it will attempt to destroy the cells, leading to the ultimate rejection of what her body sees as being an ‘alien’ foetus.
So why would a supposedly normal presentation of the human body produce antigens, which would respond so violently to the introduction of a different blood type?
Does the human body see that blood type as being of ‘alien/unknown‘ origin?
The only other time this occurs naturally in nature, is when donkeys and horses are crossbred to produce mules.
This is not in any way, a ‘natural act‘, however, because left to their own devices in the wild, these animals would never ordinarily cross breed.
Only with human intervention would and could this happen.
So is it at all possible that there was a cross breeding of two ‘humanlike‘ beings in the distant past, who were of similar physiology – but genetically very different?
It is known that those with Rh-Negative blood do have certain ‘characteristics’ that appear to be common among the greater majority of them.
Here is a list of the most commonly commented upon. (There may be a number of others)
- Extra Vertebra/Ribs
- Higher than average IQ
- Markedly higher levels of E.S.P.
- More sensitive vision and other senses
- A ‘Ridged’ Cranium
- Very few grow ‘Wisdom’ teeth
- Many are ‘Empaths’
- Lower than average body temperature
- Higher/Lower than average blood pressure
- Increased occurrences of psychic/intuitive abilities?
- Predominately blue, green, or hazel eyes
- Prone to Red or reddish hair
- Increased sensitivity to heat and sunlight
- Increased incidences of ‘Abductions’ and/or other unexplained phenomena?
So what does this mean and what can, if anything, be concluded from this?
And from what has already been outlined above, can we now safely assume any of the following?
- The appearance of Rh-Negative blood did not follow the ‘usual’ evolutionary path.
- Evolution, therefore, would then have to be ruled out as a possible source of the introduction of the Rh-Negative bloodtype.
It has been shown time and again that blood is the least likely substance of the human body to mutate, and no other blood mutations exist anywhere else in nature.
There is no evidence that proves categorically that the introduction of the Rh-Negative blood type was a NATURALLY occurring part of human evolution.
So could this add weight to the existing theory that the Rh-Negative blood factor was introduced from an ‘outside source’?
Could the source even be from human-like beings from outside our own solar system as many practitioners of that particular theory claim?
Or can the answer be found much closer to home?
Are humans as ‘alien’ as they are, in that they are a product of manipulation and interference?
Did ‘other’ life forms arrive on earth and manipulated the primitive life forms already present on a genetic level, to create what is now known as ‘modern man’?
Or again, can the answer be found much closer to home?
A number of ancient texts, including the Christian Bible, do allude to that theory.
Many stories in the ancient texts, especially pre-Christian texts, do tell about a race of beings that ‘From the Heavens to the earth came’.
And once they were here, created humankind in their own image.
The early humans saw them as their ‘Gods’, and recorded them as living exceptionally long lives and performing ‘miracles’.
They are depicted in art and writing as ‘flying about in great sky ships‘, ‘shooting fire from strange weapons‘ and ‘creating ear-shattering booms‘.
Did early humans watch in disbelief as these gods built massive and glorious buildings, as well as creating beautiful and mysterious structures for various purposes?
From humankind’s primitive point of view, they were indeed ‘Gods’.
So who were these ‘Gods’?
Ancient stories fortunately do tell us a great deal about them.
They appeared to possess advanced technology, devastating weapons and were apparently capable of interstellar travel.
They knew all about aviation, understood metallurgy, knew how to plot and chart the universe and the cosmic progression, knew advanced medicine and evidently – understood and practiced very advanced levels of genetics.
They knew how to harness atomic power and were able to build energy weapons, and how to use them.
Evidence of this can be found almost everywhere on Earth. (Although, as expected, much of it has been suppressed by mainstream historians and archeologists)
They knew about agriculture and were able to create nutritious and superior grains and other food staples.
All of what is known about the basic grains that humans rely on for food today, have been determined to have appeared around the same time in human history, spanning roughly a 10,000 year period.
A very short time, geologically speaking.
And no new grain has since been developed.
Were there ‘messages’ on earth, represented by a series of images, that have been discovered in grain fields in the form of ‘Crop Circles’?
Ancient texts, including the Bible, also tell us they began to take humans for their spouses.
The Bible says, “the gods looked upon woman and found her pleasant to behold and took her as their wives.”
They then had children with the human women, many, many children.
But not all humans were a result of this later interbreeding.
The first human beings may have been a result of scientific research combining primates’ DNA with the ‘gods’.
The first humans-like creatures to have walked upright on earth are not believed to be a product of interbreeding.
But small numbers (in comparison) – almost certainly are, and their Rhesus Negative blood type does appear to support this theory.
Earlier in this article, I described what happens when two species who were physically similar but genetically different interbreed.
Hybrids are produced.
Mules are a good example of a hybrid, the product of a union between a horse and a donkey. However, mules are born sterile because there is no genetic relationship between the horse and the donkey.
When humans were first created, were they a product of two genetically similar, but not directly related species?
Were they a combination of the DNA of the primates and the gods and produced ‘artificially’ somehow?
If the gods had the technology to create a new species, they would have no problem overcoming the problem of the hybrids being sterile surely.
A little genetic manipulation and gene splicing and it would no longer be an issue.
Were three ‘prototypes’ of humans created?
Was each one successively more advanced?
Two by design and the last entirely by chance.
Nethanderal Man may be an early humanoid species who were not created by the gods, but Cro-Magnon was almost certainly a product of intervention on a genetic level.
The next type of humanoid, who is now know as pre-human, and then we have modern man (Homo Sapiens Sapiens).
Humanity ver 4.0….
Was Modern man therefore, a result of interbreeding between the gods and pre-humans?
This interbreeding for the most part created no problems in the resulting offspring, except for a line that inherited, from their ‘other’ parents, the Rh-Negative blood type.
This is also supported by the plain, scientific fact, that these humans did not inherit the protein found in the blood, which is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.
They did not inherit it because one of their parents clearly did not possess the monkey protein.
This protein is present only because combining primate DNA with hybrid DNA from the gods created the original human proto-type that carried the original monkey protein.
So in conclusion: is it such a leap of faith to even suggest that modern man may be a creation of a highly technological race of human like beings that ‘From the Heavens to the Earth came?’
Or once again, could the answer be found much closer to home?
Could one go even further and suggest that these ‘advanced beings’ are among us today, and are still very active in the affairs of man?
A growing number of people certainly believe this to be the case.