“On the 24th January 1965, Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill died.
As the British Mainstream Media and establishment-funded ie: ‘Tame’ historians, still appear to be reluctant to publish and promote anything other than a pre-scripted, sanitised, and altogether inaccurate depiction – on this, the 50th Anniversary of the death of Winston Churchill, the Outlaw seeks to redress the balance by re-publishing the following article, which originally appeared here on July 13th 2013″.
HERE’S TO THE EDUCATORS….
Our current crop of Westminster politicians have now decided that their tame educators must now place more emphasis on teaching children ‘real’ history in a more practical manner in schools.
An indication that finally, British schools are going to be shaken out of their sleeplike, propaganda-laden and heavily-censored teaching methods perhaps?
Sadly it appears not, as one of the suggested subjects is the life and achievements of Winston Churchill, who topped the table in a BBC programme ‘The 100 Greatest Britons’ which was first aired in 2002.
The programme nominated who they considered to be ‘Great Britons’ and encouraged the viewer to vote accordingly.
It should come as no surprise that Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, DL, FRS Hon RA (1874-1965) topped that list, as (especially in the media and politics) Winston Churchill has long been celebrated as the definitive ‘Greatest Briton’.
So what is it that made this aristocratic war correspondent, author and military officer, who became First Lord of the Admiralty and wartime Prime Minister following the resignation of Neville Chamberlain in 1940, such a paragon of ‘Britishness?’
And why is he so heavily promoted by mainstream historians and the establishment? (Who incidentally have been entwined since written history has been set down for posterity.)
Was it because he behaved very aggressively towards striking workers in the General Strike of 1926, using the same methods he had used in south Wales between 1910 and 1911?
Was it because he will be forever remembered as a hammer of the workers who sent troops and tanks against the unarmed striking Mineworkers in South Wales?
Or could it be that he had rejected Adolf Hitler’s proposal to spare civilian targets, preferring instead to provoke the German leader into bombing London by ordering the Royal Air Force to attack Berlin and various civilian targets first?
It is worth remembering that Hitler in fact, had made very generous offers of peace that many people in England were more than willing to accept, which if successful, would have meant the often-referred to ‘Holocaust’ may not have occurred.
“During the first two years of the war, when the German authorities made efforts to secure the exodus of the Jews from the Reich and from Nazi occupied territory, it was Churchill & the British Government which took the lead in barring the escape routes from Europe against Jewish refugees.” – Bernard Wasserstein.
So was it his blocking of the Red Cross from accurately monitoring and recording civilian casualties, which before the end of September 1940, numbered among the dead more than 7000 in London alone, including 700 children that made him a Great Briton?
Or maybe it was the deliberate misreporting of the true number of fatalities, which, by the end of the war some 60,000 British and 650,000 German Civilians had perished due to both German & Allied ‘strategic’ bombing attacks?
Churchill himself described the Second World War as the “most unnecessary war in history,” which was an uncannily accurate statement considering his true loyalties were to bankers in the City of London who had covered his stock market gambling losses and also saved his beloved home at Chartwell from foreclosure.
But that could not have been the reason that Churchill played such a major part in involving Britain in the second largest conflict in human history could it?
There are nowadays, greater numbers of historians who believe that the Second World War was instigated to be another step towards a program, which in the long-term means to enslave humanity in a world dictatorship run solely by these London-based monopoly capitalists.
These Megalomaniacs start and perpetuate wars simply to increase their wealth and power and to manipulate, reshape and further brutalise the societies they already control financially, under the guise of carefully managed ‘Patriotism’.
The ongoing “War on Terror” for example, was always intended to make us forfeit our civil rights and steer us towards yet another unnecessary war, but this time against Islam.
One of the lesser-known facts about Winston Churchill is that his maternal grandfather was Leonard Jerome (formerly Jacobson, 1818-1891) a speculator and business partner of August Belmont (nee Schoenberg 1813-1890), who was the Rothschild family’s main American representative.
Even his often written about ‘drive’ has been attributed to the fact his parents neglected him and taught him that love has to be earned in terms of how the world saw him.
But was it simply because he wanted to avenge his father whose political career/life was cut short by syphilis?
He was also one of the coldest and narcissistic personalities that his contemporaries had ever encountered.
His rise to power was assisted by his mother’s connections with the Rothschild’s, including the powerful banker Ernest Cassell and not by the peerless leadership qualities his biographers wax lyrically about.
In the 1930’s, he became a lobbyist, promoting “The Focus Group,” which was led by the Zionist chairman of British Shell, Sir Robert Waley-Cohen.
Churchill later became the main barrier of “appeasement” and eventually the biggest opponent to making peace with Hitler.
It would not have benefited what was after all, his involvement in a plan ‘to absorb the world’s wealth’ would it?
So was he a merely a controlled and charismatic leader who was seen as the only person capable of leading the people of this country into an ill-advised and extremely costly all-out conflict with Germany?
It now seems highly likely that Hitler had angered those who Churchill served by printing his own money, which of course meant that they had lost control of both him and their plan of using Germany to further their vision of world domination.
As Churchill’s own words to Lord Robert Boothby clearly state:
“Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war, was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.”