Guest Author

THE CHEMO FRAUD

By Jonathan Benson

A team of researchers from Washington state had a giant “Oops!” moment recently when it accidentally uncovered the deadly truth about chemotherapy while investigating why prostate cancer cells are so difficult to eradicate using conventional treatment methods.

As it turns out, chemotherapy does not actually treat or cure cancer at all, according to the study’s findings, but rather fuels the growth and spread of cancer cells, making them much harder to stamp out once chemotherapy has already been initiated.

You might call it the “smoking gun” that proves, once and for all, the complete fraud of the conventional cancer industry.

Not only is chemotherapy, the standard method of cancer treatment today, a complete flop, based on the findings, but it is actually detrimental for patients with cancer.

Published in the journal Nature Medicine, the shock findings which, not surprisingly, are being ignored by the mainstream scientific community, highlight in full detail how chemotherapy causes healthy cells to release a protein that actually feeds cancer cells and causes them to thrive and proliferate.

According to the study, chemotherapy induces healthy cells to release WNT16B, a protein that helps promote cancer cell survival and growth.

Chemotherapy also definitively damages the DNA of healthy cells, a long-term detriment that persists long after chemotherapy treatment is stopped.

This combined action of healthy cell destruction and cancer cell promotion technically makes chemotherapy more of a cancer-causing protocol than a cancer-treatment protocol, by definition, a fact that should grab the attention of anyone personally familiar with having, or knowing someone else who has cancer.

“WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with nearby tumor cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist subsequent therapy,” explained study co-author Peter Nelson from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington, about the findings, which he dubbed “completely unexpected.”

“Our results indicate that damage responses in benign cells … may directly contribute to enhanced tumor growth kinetics,” added the entire team about what they observed.

Avoiding chemotherapy improves health outcomes, suggests research.

What this means, for all intents and purposes, is that the entire process of chemotherapy is completely worthless, and is actually highly detrimental for cancer patients.

Anyone searching for a real cure will want to avoid chemotherapy, in other words, and pursue an alternate route.

This may include investigating alternative treatments like the Gerson Gerson Therapy, or evaluating anti-cancer foods and nutrients like sodium bicarbonate, turmeric, high-dose vitamin C, and vitamin D.

“Whatever manipulations we’re doing to tumors can inadvertently do something to increase the tumor numbers to become more metastatic, which is what kills patients at the end of the day,” admitted Dr. Raghu Kalluri, author of a similar study published last year in the journal Cancer Cell.

This particular study found that cancer drugs, which are typically pushed alongside chemotherapy, cause tumors to metastasize.

LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sources:

NY DAILY NEWS

NATURAL SOCIETY

WAKE UP WORLD

5 Comments

  1. vampyry vikky

    “This particular study found that cancer drugs, which are typically pushed alongside chemotherapy, cause tumors to metastasize”

    These medications sound like they have the same sort of devastating effect that many anti-psychotic drugs used on elderly patients can have – the so-called ‘chemical cosh’. Why, for example, do some previously healthy elderly people who break a hip are ‘diagnosed’ by doctors with having full blown Alzheimer’s within 24 hours leading them to get discharged from hospital straight into a care home where they deteriorate rapidly and die within an average of 2 years?! Yet on the other hand, they tell us that Alzheimer’s is a progressive illness – conflicting information here? How much of this is worsened, or even caused, by medications such as doses of morphine which their frail bodies cannot cope with – or medicines such as ‘nitrazepam’ which they are administered to them, but when you look it up on Wikipedia it says do not give to the elderly? Many of the side effects of these drugs exactly mirror the symptoms of dementia – e.g. hallucinations, forgetfulness, unsteady gait and an increased likelihood of further falls and loss of balance. What is going on? If they found a cure for Alzheimer’s and other diseases tomorrow I guess the big pharmaceutical companies and the owners of the care homes (charging £600 per week!) fees would lose a vast source of profit. Are vested interests impeding cures for certain diseases – or even covering them up if they’ve already been discovered – because they threaten the economic profits they are making?

    • An excellent analogy. Probably closer to the truth than most people would dare to admit, especially if they have placed all their faith, (and their elderly loved ones) into a system that they believed would look after them ‘from the cradle to the grave.’ Not knocking the NHS in any way as I still believe it’s the finest system that has ever been implemented in this country. It’s the Pharmaceutical Companies and the money men I despise. Their crimes should be listed among the many acts of genocide that have been recorded throughout the ages. Or is that too strong a response?

      • vampyry vikky

        If they are indeed poisoning people for profit – or even sitting on cures and impeding research for cures because it threatens their vested interests – then the amount of patients who have died because of their deliberate, calculated actions would indeed amount to mass murder. There are many good doctors, but inevitably there are also some bad ones that can be corrupted. It’s as common today to trust someone wearing a white coat as it was around 100 years ago to automatically trust someone wearing a uniform. Yet someone like Harold Shipman was trusted for decades before they were finally found out, weren’t they? And because he was seen to being doing lots of charitable work in hospitals so was Jimmy Savile! I’ve also heard that pharmaceutical companies will not fund research into certain diseases unless they feel it will be profitable.

  2. An excellent post as always.

    There is a great article on cancer and medicine for profit here: THE DOCTOR WITHIN

    My mother was diagnosed with lymphoma three years ago and despite all my misgivings about chemo, I found myself in a position where it was more important to support her decision to go ahead with it than fight the system. Two and a half years later, on schedule, she sadly passed away. Not from lymphoma, but from complications induced by the treatment, which by the end included multiple doses of radio as well as chemo.

    As Dr Tim says, alternative medicine is often the last resort, which was the case with my mum. She agreed to detox, and sort her immune system out, but was cobbled by high doses of steroids on top of everything else, before we could begin.

    Going through her medicine cabinet afterwards, and checking all of the pills online, I can’t believe the amount of crap she’d been prescribed. To be honest, I’m amazed she lasted so long with all that poison in her system.

Comments are Closed

Theme by Anders Norén