Guest Author

REMEMBER MACUR

‘NO MORE DELAYS TO CHILD ABUSE REPORT’

By David Williamson

North Wales MPs have said they fear evidence gathered as part of the long awaited investigation into child abuse in the region may be held back from publication.

Dwyfor Meirionedd Plaid Cymru MP Liz Saville Roberts has written to Justice Secretary Michael Gove to press for the release of the report, which was delivered to the Government in December.

“The Stories I could tell if I could talk!”

Conservative Justice Minister Caroline Dineage has stated it must be “considered by law enforcement agencies and the Government before it can be published” and that “this includes considering whether redactions need to be made”.

Ms Roberts pressed for greater “urgency“, saying:

“The Macur Review into the scope of the Waterhouse Inquiry and the suffuciency of its investigations has far-reaching implications for people living in my Dwyfor Meirionedd constituency. I feel that the excessively long-standing nature of inquiries into child abuse allegations in North Wales calls for a greater level of urgency at this stage.

The nature of the Review’s contents may well call for the redaction of certain material; however, I would question whether this material would be included in its findings and recommendations, and in the interest of public transparency, I would strongly urge that these be published as soon as possible .”

Cynon Valley Labour MP Anne Clwyd, who has long campaigned for justice for victims of child abuse, has also questioned the Government about the publication of the review.

She said:

“It’s high-time it was published. I find it a bit surprising they are still dragging their feet. I am worried about possible redaction because clearly that’s the intention and I don’t think anybody us going to be satisfied by that.”

“[Any] suggestion that there may be a cover-up obviously is deeply concerning.”

Wrexham Labour MP Ian Lucas said:

“The Macur review, and the report which it has produced, are of extreme importance to many in Wrexham. That is why I have been pushing for it’s release as soon as possible. The Ministry of Justice have appeared to agree with the principle that the report should be released. They said that release was being considered as ‘a matter of urgency’ more than a month ago. The report and its contents are likely to have implications for people and institutions in Wrexham, across North Wales and wider afield. They need to know that the report will be released in a manner which will allow it to be given serious consideration – which Is why I think that the Ministry of Justuce and the Wales Office need to set out what they are intending to do with the report, and when.”

Conservative justice minister Caroline Dineage thus month stated in a response to Ms Clwyd:

“The report needs to be considered by law enforcement agencies and the government before it can be published. This includes whether redactions need to be made. Lady Justice Macur has recommended that certain material should be considered for redaction. The work is proceeding at pace with a view to publication as soon as possible.”

Back in 2012, Home Secretary Theresa May announced that Lady Justice Macur would stage a review of Sir Ronald Waterhouse’s inquiry into the abuse of children in care.

The review was charged with determining whether specific allegations were not investigated.

33 Comments

  1. Jane

    Same old same old, they get to pick and choose what they cover up. Predictable and depressing. So much for the Tory buzz word ‘Transparency’ – the definition in the Eton version of the Dictionary is obviously completely opposite to everyone elses copy.

  2. OldGit

    “As long as such enquiries do not drag in any of my close political friends or any members of the special handshake brigade”.

    THERE ! Fixed it! Any arguments.?

  3. OldGit

    AND NOW – SOME RUSSIAN DANCING FOR YOU ALL:-

    YOUTUBE

  4. Faith

    Hopefully Messhead and the other compo seekers will not be allowed to get away with their ‘drama-queen grandstanding’ this time?

  5. I don’t trust Michael Gove, he is not who he seems to be.

  6. OldGit

    A NOW A ROUND-UP OF THE RECENT ACTIVITIES OF OUR NEW INVADERS – SORRY ! – “IMMIGRANTS”:-

    BREIBART.COM

    SHOEBAT.COM

    THELOCAL.DE

    JEWISHPRESS.COM

  7. OldGit

    A COUPLE OF DAVE HODGES WARNINGS FOR U.S.READERS:-

    THECOMMONSENSESHOW

    THECOMMONSENSESHOW/2

    True Judaism Will Kill Us if We Don’t Reject It in Time:-

    THEUGLYTRUTH

    Facebook Is Providing “Red List” User Date to the Chinese Military In Preparation for NATO Led Martial Law:-

    THECOMMONSENSESHOW/3

  8. OldGit

    Unprecedented volcanic unrest around the world in 2016 have the authorities and scientists worried about a year without summer which will happen again and Western Civilisation is not prepared!:-

    THEBIGWOBBLE.ORG

    NOTHING ABOUT THIS IN THE BRIT MEDIA. WONDER WHY?.

    WND.COM

    • From what I have been seeing, the Brit media are playing catch up on most things OG.

  9. OldGit

    YES, I KNOW IT’S SORCHA FAAL, BUT…

    WHAT DOES IT MEAN

    Putin’s Biggest Failure:-

    UNZ.COM

    Military Analysis: Russian Black Sea Fleet:-

    SOUTHFORK.ORG

    THE GENERAL & THE BLONDE BOMBSHELL:-

    MILITARYCORRUPTION.COM

    DO YOU SUFFER FROM AN “Employment-resistant personality profile”?:-

    (TRY THE COMMENTS)

    FREEREPUBLIC.COM

    • Can you make that the last Sorcha Faal link you post to the Outlaw please OG.

      I am not comfortable linking to them.

      A turd is still a turd, however well it’s been polished.

  10. Chris Walker

    I was at one of the Macur meetings at the posh hotel behind the Maelor way back in 2013 Jimmy. My thoughts now are that Justice Macur is going to nail Waterhouse down so tight it will never be allowed to be questioned again. There is no way that they will ever admit to a £14m cover up like Waterhouse undoubtably was

  11. OldGit

    SECRET SURVEILLANCE AND ELECTROMAGNETIC TORTURE BY THE SECRET SERVICES:-

    RUDY2.WORDPRESS.COM

  12. richard1

    Helloooooo ! when i said ‘i;m outta here’ i didnt mean forever i meant it in relation to talking about the moon landings. been there done that. but here is a very interesting article about conspiracy theories in general especially the really big ones. those characters over at spivland would do well to read it. hiiiiiiiiiiiii FTS.

    PHYS.ORG

    • Jane

      Did you read this Richard? 🙂

      NBCNEWS.COM

      • richard1

        hi. yep thats not moon rock. not quite sure what was going on there. but of course that doesnt mean that moonrocks were not brought back from the moon. they were. 1000s of scientists all round the world received small pieces. they were not fakes.
        curator.jsc.nasa.gov/Lunar/index.cfm

        • A fair point Richard, but I am curious to hear your interpretation of how NASA have managed to ‘misplace’ the equivalent of three large rooms of ‘evidence’ from the Apollo Missions.

      • Mike

        To be fair Jane, this doesn’t prove the moon landings were fake.

        • Jane

          Maybe not Mike, but it does prove that something that could easily have been tested was passed off as moon rock, which it wasn’t.

          And as Jimmy has pointed out, 3 room fulls of the stuff vanished into thin air, as if someone somewhere didn’t want it to be proven to be fake perhaps?

          However can so much moon rock be ‘lost’ so carelessly and easily, when it’s been deemed to be so important since it was ‘brought back’ (from the props department)? *Innocent face*. Maybe someone should ask James T. Kirk, just in case he beamed it back up there Scotty whilst on the set of Star Trek by mistake?
          😀

          • Mike

            Yeah there is a lot about NASA that is suspect, and all that stuff going missing is hard for me to take, and I am not happy with it at all tbh, it’s one of those subjects I suppose, a bit like Marmite.

    • OldGit

      RICHARD; IF YOU PUT 82.221.129.208 INTO YOUR SEARCH ENGINE IT’LL TAKE YOU STRAIGHT TO JimStone’s SITE. SCROLL DOWN A BIT & YOU’LL FIND HE AGREES WITH YOUR POSITION – QUITE FORCEFULLY! WITH PHOTOS FROM OTHER NATIONS OF THE LANDERS ON THE MOON’S SURFACE.

      • richard1

        yep all the landing sites have been photogaphed. it ‘s possible to see the the landing section of the lunar module, the trails left by the lunar rovers and the lunar rovers themselves. but if you have the viewpoint that the landings were a hoax then you have to say those photos were

        fakes too and thats precisely what deniers say. its just impossible to convince some people. i don’t bother anymore.

  13. OldGit

    FOR THOSE WHO LIKE THIS KIND OF STUFF:-

    “I have become increasingly convinced that the Beatles were involved, directly or indirectly, in a British government sponsored experiment in mind-control and I am now in a position to detail some of these attempts”.:-

    BEACONFILMS2011

    WITH SEVERAL LINKS FLESHING OUT THE ROTHSCHILD STORY – ANYONE WHO WONDERS WHY I POST ON THESE MATTERS WOULD DO WELL TO READ ALL OF THIS: A Complete List of BANKS Owned or Controlled by the Rothschild Family:-

    HUMANSAREFREE.COM

    Iran: Lifting Sanctions and Coming Betrayal:-

    ACTIVISTPOST.COM

  14. OldGit

    The “Deepwater Horizon” disaster in the Gulf of Mexico has gone “off the radar” of the MSM & the AM. This article suggests that it is going to cause real problems soon.:-

    RECENT LOSS OF ATLANTIC CURRENT DOOMS MANKIND:-

    THECHOICEPERSPECTIVE.COM

  15. richard1

    ok . check this out. there are MOUNTAINS of video, audio, technical data, flight plans. missions reports etc etc. just keep on scrolling down. each Apollo mission has its own section. there is soooooooooo much info here thats it’s far far easier to believe the moon landings took place than not to believe it. but no doubt some will still remain unconvinced. ok sorry i know this is off topic. really done now.

    NASA.COM/HISTORY

    • Would they be ‘MOON MOUNTAINS’ or regular mountains Richard?

    • Faith

      Hi Richard, there is loads of information in the bible and there are loads of one-subject websites absolutely packed with information that may or may not be true

      All of these have their believers and their detractors and each side offers a pretty good argument so it’s one of them innit?

      You either is or you isn’t

  16. richard1

    last word on the moon landings. check this site out. it has 1000s of videos. audios. technical data. mission overviews etc etc. each Apollo mission has its own section.. keep scrolling down ! there is soooooooooo much information you’d almost think the landings actually happened!

    YOUTUBE

  17. richard1

    ooops apologies. wrong website there. worth watching though. ! here is the Apollo site.

    NASA.GOV/HISTORY

    • Richard, I have mentioned this before, more than once – in order to convince people it may be advisable to link to more than one source.

      Especially if that source is the very agency that has a virtual stranglehold on any/all information space related, and are notoriously deceptive and selective as to what information is released.

      An increasingly large number of people the world over simply do not trust NASA, why would that be?

Comments are Closed

Theme by Anders Norén