All posts for the month January, 2016

If there is one subject that is guaranteed to bring out the very worst in people, especially on the Internet, it is whenever the small matter of the ‘Flat Earth’ is discussed.

It has, in some cases, caused such angry online debate, that a number of websites have had to resort to removing the facility to comment on the FE articles they subsequently publish.

It’s not as if belief in a Flat Earth is an entirely ‘new’ idea either, as has been alleged in some corners of the www …. as the belief that the earth was flat has been around since humankind began to walk upright.

A belief that the earth is at the centre of all celestial bodies in the universe, and a model that has served as the predominant system since the heavens were first mapped by Aristotle and Ptolemy in Ancient Greece.

The Sumerians, Babylonians, ancient Egyptians, early Hebrews and most Greeks believed in a flat earth.


Towards the Flat Earth

Some ancient Greek scientists, and a number of church fathers, however, like the Venerable Bede, Albertus Magnus and St Thomas-Aquinas did support the round earth model, and in late medieval times, Bacon, Corpernicus, Galileo, Columbus and Magellan also held that view.

Of the above, it was Nicolaus Corpernicus (1473-1543) who is widely believed to have ‘discovered’ that the earth was in fact, spherical, and according to Wikipedia: “was the first astronomer to formulate a comprehensive heliocentric cosmology, which displaced the earth from the centre of the universe.”

However, Corpernicus was not an astronomer.

Astronomy was only a hobby of his, his real expertise lay in languages, law and medicine, and it could be argued that it may have been that as a Catholic Jesuit, and a Freemason to boot, that his heliocentric hypothothes was promoted and sustained by those networks.

After all, it was Francis Bacon, in an unfinished article from that period entitled ‘The New Atlantis’, who wrote about the infiltration of the Freemasons into all things scientific and religious, and acknowledged that “subversive members of the order controlled all of medicine, science and astronomy/astrology.”

It was Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), with his invention of the telescope, that was historically, the person who’s own heliocentric theory helped to ‘prove’ Corpernicus’ sun-centred theory, thus gaining universal recognition for the round earth model, a belief which still dominates the greater majority of scientific teaching today.

The majority of modern scientific textbooks still state that Galileo proved the Corpernican theory, despite the very real and often overlooked fact, that neither Galileo or Copernicus , proved anything of the sort.

Bernard Cohen in ‘Birth of a New Physics’ (1960) certainly didn’t agree with either of them when he wrote: “There is no planetary observation by which we on earth can prove the earth is moving on an orbit around the sun.”

And Friedrich Wilhelmina Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), who attempted to gather the known facts into a uniform conception of nature in his multi-volume work, ‘Kosmos‘, a century earlier, spoke with honesty when he stated: “I have already known for a long time that we have no proof for the system of Corpernicus … But I dare not be the first one to attack it.”

Humboldt, who his contemporaries considered to be the most famous man in the world after Napoleon, has the unique honour of being the person that has had more plants, animals, minerals and places named after him than any other human being – alive or dead.

In California alone, there is a County, a bay, a college and a state park that bear his name, and he is one of the founding fathers of environmentalism, yet he has been almost forgotten in the English-speaking world.

His most famous work was the aforementioned ‘Kosmos’, which was translated into more than a dozen languages, and within its pages could be found subjects as diverse as the journeys undertaken between outer space and earth, distant nebulae, landscape painting, terrestrial magnetism, poetry, ecology, botany and even erupting volcanoes.

There was scarcely a single subject, that concerned the natural world, which was left out.

‘Kosmos’ was unlike any other work before it, and very few books that have been produced since can surpass it. It has graced the libraries of many of history’s greatest thinkers, philosophers, artists and poets, and it’s influence, even today, is difficult to overestimate and is understandably, unique.

So would it be fair to describe a man such as Alexander von Humboldt as a ‘Flat Earther’?

After all, he has been credited with saying ‘that no proof existed, [in his lifetime at least] for Corpernicus’ Heliocentric hypothesis’, which was, if you recall, backed up by Galileo Galilei’s own scientific findings, and is what the ‘Spherical Earth‘ belief has been based on ever since.

But a lot has changed since Humboldt’s death in 1859, and although it is true that the modern proponents of the natural sciences have moved on from the romantic perspective Humboldt presented in his seminal work, ‘Kosmos’ is still widely considered to be a remarkable scientific and literary achievement which advanced scientific understanding and progress beyond measure.

With that in mind, would it still be seen as foolhardy to base ones own belief in the existence of a Geocentric earth model on such a work?

A surprising number of people do, although it must be said that the majority of them are probably not even aware of Humboldt’s existence, but elements of his work have certainly found their way into the beliefs of the various Flat Earth groups and societies that have existed in one form or another, ever since.

I read somewhere online fairly recently, that the idea of a Flat Earth was introduced only a few months ago, as ‘a Psyop designed to split the truth movement and to discredit all the conspiracy theorists who promote the idea’, which apart from being grossly innacurate, has lead some to believe that the basis of the recent in-fighting and online arguments that accompany any FE discussion, could stem from the introduction of something which could indeed be viewed as a type of ‘Psychological Operation’, and of the type favoured by the various ‘Change Agencies’ that manipulate and steer public opinion, in many ways.

Personally, I do not believe the earth is flat – nor do I believe that it resembles the ubiquitous ‘Round Blue Marble’ which NASA freely admits is a ‘composite image’, therefore not an actual photograph …. I lean more towards the earth being something in between the two, and has been depicted since the 17th century as being a perfect sphere, simply because it’s actual shape was viewed as being too much of a ‘leap of faith’ and something that people would simply not understand.



It would be difficult for anybody in the UK and Europe, to avoid the lurid mainstream media headlines decrying the alleged treatment of a number of migrants, who have been rehoused in the north east of England.

The Telegraph for example had on its front page: “Red front doors on asylum-seeker homes in Middlesborough ‘mark them out for race hate yobs’, the Huffington Post claimed: “Asylum Seekers’ Red front doors to be repainted after G4S blamed for ‘Apartheid’ policy in Middlesborough”, and the Sun chimed in with: “Middlesborough asylum seekers say dog mess and eggs are being thrown at their ‘branded red doors'”.

Some media outlets, including the BBC, have gone even further, by comparing the red doors to the “yellow stars that Jews were forced to wear in Nazi Germany!”

Some emotive words there would you agree?

Words which may lead the reader to believe that the doors of these properties had been deliberately painted red, prior to the arrival of the migrants, in order to single them out and to persecute them.

Would that be a fair assessment?

So what does that say for journalism in this country, when it takes only five minutes into a session of the Home Affairs Committee, to establish that only 59% of the doors of these properties had been painted red – and had been painted that colour for around twenty years?

Are the lurid media headlines just another attempt to garner sympathy and instill a collective guilt in the British population, to try and combat the marked increase in objections, and the unease that a growing number of people are feeling in regard to the numbers of migrants coming into the UK?


“The whole purpose of parliamentary select committees was supposed to be to help inform policy-making. Instead, they have sunk to becoming rather vulgar kangaroo courts used by wannabe barristers of the backbenchers to boost their egos. It took about five minutes at today’s session of the Commons Home Affairs Committee to establish that neither G4S nor Jomast (the landlord that provides properties in Middlesborough for the housing of asylum seekers) have a policy of deliberately painting front doors red in order to help identify the occupants as asylum-seekers. Only 59 per cent of properties in the town occupied by asylum seekers are red, it turns out. Moreover, the doors have been painted red for 20 years – long before they were used to house asylum-seekers”




By David Williamson

North Wales MPs have said they fear evidence gathered as part of the long awaited investigation into child abuse in the region may be held back from publication.

Dwyfor Meirionedd Plaid Cymru MP Liz Saville Roberts has written to Justice Secretary Michael Gove to press for the release of the report, which was delivered to the Government in December.

“The Stories I could tell if I could talk!”


Conservative Justice Minister Caroline Dineage has stated it must be “considered by law enforcement agencies and the Government before it can be published” and that “this includes considering whether redactions need to be made”.

Ms Roberts pressed for greater “urgency“, saying:

“The Macur Review into the scope of the Waterhouse Inquiry and the suffuciency of its investigations has far-reaching implications for people living in my Dwyfor Meirionedd constituency. I feel that the excessively long-standing nature of inquiries into child abuse allegations in North Wales calls for a greater level of urgency at this stage.

The nature of the Review’s contents may well call for the redaction of certain material; however, I would question whether this material would be included in its findings and recommendations, and in the interest of public transparency, I would strongly urge that these be published as soon as possible .”

Cynon Valley Labour MP Anne Clwyd, who has long campaigned for justice for victims of child abuse, has also questioned the Government about the publication of the review.

She said:

“It’s high-time it was published. I find it a bit surprising they are still dragging their feet. I am worried about possible redaction because clearly that’s the intention and I don’t think anybody us going to be satisfied by that.”

“[Any] suggestion that there may be a cover-up obviously is deeply concerning.”

Wrexham Labour MP Ian Lucas said:

“The Macur review, and the report which it has produced, are of extreme importance to many in Wrexham. That is why I have been pushing for it’s release as soon as possible. The Ministry of Justice have appeared to agree with the principle that the report should be released. They said that release was being considered as ‘a matter of urgency’ more than a month ago. The report and its contents are likely to have implications for people and institutions in Wrexham, across North Wales and wider afield. They need to know that the report will be released in a manner which will allow it to be given serious consideration – which Is why I think that the Ministry of Justuce and the Wales Office need to set out what they are intending to do with the report, and when.”

Conservative justice minister Caroline Dineage thus month stated in a response to Ms Clwyd:

“The report needs to be considered by law enforcement agencies and the government before it can be published. This includes whether redactions need to be made. Lady Justice Macur has recommended that certain material should be considered for redaction. The work is proceeding at pace with a view to publication as soon as possible.”

Back in 2012, Home Secretary Theresa May announced that Lady Justice Macur would stage a review of Sir Ronald Waterhouse’s inquiry into the abuse of children in care.

The review was charged with determining whether specific allegations were not investigated.

Unless you happen to live in, or visit Scotland, Wales, parts of Ireland or the Isle of Wight, it is highly improbable that you would even catch a glimpse of a creature that has been a resident of the United Kingdom for millennia.

That creature is the Red Squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) and has been native to these shores since the land bridge between Britain and Europe began to disappear following the last ice age, estimated to be around 10,000 years ago.

Although it has to be said that by the 18th century, the numbers of reds had declined almost to the point of extinction in Scotland, a decline that can largely be attributed to the need for timber, and the felling of large areas of woodland – by the start of the 20th century, there was a thriving population of reds across the whole country.

The increase is believed to be due to a drive in the latter half of the 19th century to replace the trees that had been lost, which then restored the natural habits of many creatures, including our friend, the red squirrel.

Unfortunately, as we moved through the 20th century, the two world wars, which resulted in further tree clearances, and outbreaks of two fatal diseases (for reds) – Coccidiosis and the Squirrelpox virus, meant that the numbers had plummeted to the level previously witnessed in Scotland, but this time the entire country had been affected.

Although a number of theories have been presented for the decimation of the reds population in Britain, a significant factor, and one which has been proven to have contributed greatly to their demise – is the introduction of a pair of North American grey squirrels in 1876, at Henbury Park, Cheshire, by a certain Mr. Brocklehurst.

The instant novelty appeal of these ‘new’ greys, led to further releases throughout England over the following fifty years, and had spread to Scotland by 1892, where breeding pairs were introduced to a number of sites, including Edinburgh Zoo.

The spread of the exotic newcomers was far greater than had been anticipated, and for a long time it was believed that the decidedly more aggressive nature of the larger greys, was responsible for the replacement of the native species, however, extensive research has shown this not to be the case.

There are a number of factors that are now known to be a contributing factor in the stark imbalance between the two species, one of which is the greys’ superior efficiency in digesting acorns and hazelnuts, which, unlike the reds, they are able to process even before they are fully ripe, so are able to gain the nutritional benefits far earlier in the season.

Greys are also known to ‘steal’ the nuts and seeds from the winter stores of the reds, which results in faster and greater weight gain and improved levels of successful breeding.

Reds are dependant on their body fat reserves to successfully breed and rear their young.

It has also been shown that within fifteen years of the appearence of greys in their natural habitats, the reds are unlikely to remain.

There are now approximately 161,000 red squirrels in Great Britain, with around 30,000 in England, 10,000 in Wales (although recent estimates are significantly lower), and a main population of 121,000 in Scotland. The population in England has a very fragmented distribution, occurring in isolated populations in the south of England, on the islands in Poole Harbour and the Isle of Wight, in the east, in Thetford Forest (although this population may already have disappeared) and across the north of England. The Welsh population is mostly confined to discreet woodland patches, predominately in large coniferous forest blocks such as the Clocaenog forest and on the Isle of Anglesey. A survey in Northern Ireland gave a figure of 10,000 across the province. SOURCE

Following a survey in 2014, it is estimated that there are upwards of 2,525,000 grey squirrels in the UK, and despite any number of measures in place to control those numbers, they are expected to increase year on year.

The video accompanying this article, was uploaded to Facebook by Tom Finch, and was taken from the recently screened BBC show ‘Stargazing Live’, which focussed on the highly publicised ‘Space Walk’ of the British astronaut Tim Peake, to repair a broken solar panel on the International Space Station (ISS), which is believed to be currently orbiting the Earth.


The video comprises a short conversation between Dr. Brian Cox and Canadian Astronaut Chris Hadfield, who last year, regaled a worldwide Television and Internet audience with his rendition of the David Bowie Classic ‘Space Oddity’, while orbiting the Earth aboard the ISS.

During that conversation, Hadfield makes some unexpected revelations, that must now surely raise some serious questions.

The video and audio is not the best quality, so I have transcribed the conversation for clarity.

BRIAN COX: “How important is the engineering? That we have learned to build such a large structure in orbit?

CHRIS HADFIELD: “It’s sort of as if a little kid is sailing a sailboat on a pond remotely. At some point, that person starts to sail a sailboat up and down the coast, then they invent and study and learn to figure out all the things they need to do, so that maybe … then someday, they can actually sail out of sight of land. And the station [ISS] has been orbiting the Earth as if … we are sort of … as if we are sailing in sight of land, as we invent … I mean …

What do we make the hull out of?

How do you navigate?

What food do you need?

How do you make a toilet that will work forever?

How do you recycle water?

How do you recycle the oxygen?

It’s the main crucible test that we’ve been trying to grind out all the lessons, that’ll eventually … ‘LET US GO TO THE MOON … AND EVEN FURTHER AWAY!’

Following the recent media reports of the Muslim ‘assaults’ in the German city of Cologne on New Years Eve, a number of Alternative Media websites, like VETERANS TODAY being one example, have expressed the view that the assaults on what are now believed to be dozens of women – were not only organised, but a ‘False Flag’ event.

Going on what has been reported upon, even by mainstream sources, on the surface it does appear as though these attacks were not random events, but were in some way ‘coordinated’ and planned in advance.

“Something like that does not come from nowhere, there must be someone behind it,” said the German Minister of Justice, Heiko Mass, who went on to say, “It seems like everything was planned in advance.”

Which, if taken on it’s own would be the view of one man only, and hardly qualifies it as a ‘False Flag’, at least not as most people perceive FF’s to be.

However, when non-official spokespersons and independent witnesses have claimed that during the attacks, the police were “standing around with their hands in their pockets, while nightclub bouncers came to the aid of the women being groped and robbed,” it does appear that something is not quite right with this picture.

With that in mind, would it be safe to assume that not only were the police standing around, apparently uninterested in more than a hundred separate incidents, but undercover police officers were likely to have been involved in the assaults as well?

And if that is true, which according to a number of witnesses is indeed the case, then what possible reasons could there be for this to have occurred?

Is it as simple as what is being alleged on various websites and social media accounts, that these events were staged by the police and coordinated with the media having full knowledge, simply to build on the already existing feelings of resentment towards refugees ?

Was it to build further on the hysteria that already exists, not only among the German people, but the whole of Europe, and not only against refugees, but Islam itself?

“The best protection is not an arms length, but the whole Mediterranean”

Now here is where it gets confusing, because for any or all of the above to be true, why then, were the same police force, less than a week later, being shown across the mass media using every available resource available to them, including water cannon, against groups of protesters who had gathered to voice their anger against the New Year sex attacks?

Officially, it was reported as being a response to “Far-Right Pergida demonstrators, who had been throwing missiles at the police and had refused to pull back”, which would not make any sense if the intention of the New Years sex attacks were to whip up anti-immigration (Muslim) feelings among Germans by the authorities ….

And wasn’t Frau Merkel herself visibly outraged over these disgusting attacks and sexual assaults?

Wasn’t she quoted as saying to the mayor of Cologne, Henriette Reker by phone, that: “everything must be done to find the perpetrators as quickly and comprehensively as possible and punish them, regardless of their origin and background?”

Since the attacks, women have made more than 90 criminal complaints to the police about harrassment by gangs of men at Cologne’s main railway station on New Years Eve.

Both witnesses and police have said that the men were of ‘Arab or North African appearence’, and upwards of 300 women demonstrated against the attacks near the scene holding placards which read: “Mrs Merkel! Where are you? What do you say? This alarms us?”

There is little doubt that these attacks occurred exactly as they were reported, not only in Cologne, but women were also targeted in Stuttgart and Hamburg the same night.

One woman was raped, and many more were assaulted, including a volunteer policewoman and a 15-year-old girl and her mother outside the railway station, although it must be said, that the majority of the crimes reported were of robbery.

Eight suspects were detained and it was reported that: “They were all asylum seekers, carrying copies of their residence certificates”.

Although the mainstream media are trying to play down the attacks, citing in one instance: “that the area has long been viewed as a notoriously dangerous area when it comes to pickpockets and theft”, but the sexual harrassment is a completely new element, and one that the media are finding difficult to cover up.

They do acknowledge however, that the attacks do appear to have been organised, agreeing that around 1000 ‘young men‘ arrived in large groups, seemingly with the sole intention of attacking local females.

If the attacks were confined to one country, then an organised ‘False Flag’ event could offer a possible explanation, but as the assaults occurred in a number of locations, and not only in Germany, but in Swedish Malmö, Katlstad and Kalmar in Sweden, and on the same night – the chances of it being a False Flag event are decreased substantially.

According to RT.COM, a number of similar incidences were reported in the Sydsvenskan newspaper, after reports emerged that Swedish police had been accused of ignoring sexual harrassment at a Stockholm music festival earlier that week.

Gangs of unattended young men, in groups of between eight and ten in number, and believed to be from Afghanistan, molested a number of women in Malmö, but dispersed and disappeared upon spotting police officers who had attended. Similar cases were reportedly prevented in other parts of the city before any real harm was done, and it has not been reported whether any of the women have filed official reports.

What was reported, however, was that this type of ‘Gang Harrassment‘ was previously unheard of in Malmö.

Gang attacks of this type have been recorded elsewhere though, in the Arab world it is now so prevalent it has become a phenomenon, and even has a name, ‘Taharrush Gamea’.

The name of this thoroughly unpleasant practice, translates as Collective Harrassment, and is carried out by large groups of men who sexually assault lone, or small numbers of women, by groping, assaulting them, or in a number of incidences, raping them.

The group of men first surround their selected victim in circles. Some of the group then sexually assault them, while others, not directly involved, simply watch or divert outsider’s attention to what is going on.

So would that explain the ‘organised’ and ‘coordinated’ nature of the attacks as described by eyewitnesses?

And what about the witness reports that claimed: ‘the police were standing around with their hands in their pockets’, doing little to assist the victims or to arrest the perpetrators?

Would this report from RT.COM go some way to explaining that German law enforcement officers were unable to tackle crimes of this nature head-on, as they were wary of being accused of using ‘excessive violence or racism’ ?

Were a number of incidents perpetrated by migrants being played down purposely, or hidden altogether in order to maintain desirable crime statistics?

It would certainly appear to be that way, if a German federal police officer is to be believed, when he said: “One asylum seeker wanted to cut his fellows throat. But the crime scene report included only ‘severe injuries’ rather than a murder attempt.”

The officer went on to say that in his view the crime rate among refugees far exceeds that of the local population, and during the previous months, he had only secured a single criminal charge, and that was against a German, while the majority of criminal suspects were refugees.

Referring to the incidences of harrassment against women, similar to that that took place in Cologne on New Years Eve, the officer said that such cases were widespread in Bavaria as well.

“At the train station, women were sexually harassed and verbally offended on a regular basis. When we speak of an entry ban [to the area], they would shout at us: ‘You are not my police, you are a racist.'”

Whenever a refugee needs to be controlled, the police cannot arrest him, or even detain him for a short time, citing ‘superior orders‘ which prevented coercive actions. “Our rules [orders] are: “Better to let him run away”.

The sexual elements of these attacks are not even confined to Germany, as similar incidences in Sweden were recorded the same night, and there is too much available evidence, to dispute the simple fact, that much of Europe is now enduring what has been described as a ‘Rape Epidemic‘ and in the countries which have the highest populations of migrants.

So is it safe to assume, that although not new, are the recently reported sexual assaults on women throughout Europe a by-product of the high levels of immigration into Europe?

You have to say it all when you say that Europe is now a place where women have lost their perennial fight for decency because the indecent alone live” Page 82: Catholic Digest, December 1945

The quote above is a reference to the horrors of the ‘8 to 80’ practice that was visited on the German population by the allies following the end of World War Two, where any female between those ages were systematically raped, many to the point of death.

“Many a sane American family would recoil in horror if they knew how our boys conduct themselves, with complete callousness in human relations over there” TIME MAGAZINE, October 2nd 1945

There are still Germans alive who can recall with clarity, not only the Second World War, but also its aftermath, which for many held far greater horrors than they experienced during the conflict, and horrors which were not only encouraged by the allied powers at the time, but were notably omitted by the mainstream historians, who like the authorities, and the mass media, effectively ‘turned a blind eye’.

Present day Europe of course, is not emerging from a worldwide conflict, where lines sometimes become blurred and conquered countries and their womenfolk are viewed as ‘spoils of war’, and are treated in the most dispicable manner as a result, so comparisons between the two may be unfair – but to increasing numbers of people in Europe, it is certainly beginning to feel that way.

Which is entirely understandable when the official response to the rape of a four-year-old boy, by an undisclosed number of adult men in a ‘Reception Centre’ for migrants in Norway recently was: “The aim of our [Private] Company (Hero) is to help asylum seekers ‘avoid mistakes as they discover Norweigan culture‘. There is no single cultural code to say what is good and bad behaviour because we want a free society. There has to be tolerance for attitudes that may be seen as immoral by some traditional or religious norms’.

Is it any wonder that increasing numbers of Europeans are rapidly losing faith not only in Politicians, but are becoming even more distrustful of the mass media, who are failing en masse to report on the true scale of the problem?

So I will leave this, if I may, with an (in)direct quote from an infamous Libertarian blogger and Twitter stalwart, who tweeted most eloquently:

“Welcome to Europe, where the collective decision has been made, that Mass immigration is of more importance to politicians – than women and children.”

“The New Years Eve release of over 3000 new Hillary Clinton emails from the State Department has CNN abuzz over gossipy text messages, the ‘who gets to ride with Hilary’ selection process set up by her staff, and how a ‘cute’ Hillary photo fared on Facebook.”


CNN, however, have, along with other mainstream media outlets, been somewhat remiss in reporting on the more ‘explosive’ confirmations about Libya, which were also contained in the latest set of Clinton Email releases.

Admissions of rebel war crimes, special ops trainers being placed inside Libya from the very beginning of the protests preceding the invasion, Al Queda being firmly embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, western nations fighting to gain access to the Libyan oil fields, the real origins of the ridiculous Viagra-fuelled mass rape claims, and what may have been the real reason why the NATO-backed coalition effectively destroyed the country – the concern over Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, which would have directly competed with both the Euro and the Dollar.

One of those who predicted that Mu’ummar Qaddafi would be overthrown and Libya utterly destroyed was Quaddafi himself, who in his final speeches, told of a future Libya mired in utter chaos, endless civil conflict, western interference and a breeding ground for Jihadi fundamentalism and extremists.

 “In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the merciful….

For forty years, or was it longer, I can’t remember, I did all I could to give people houses, hospitals, schools, and when they were hungry, I gave them food.

I even made Benghazi into farmland from the desert, I stood up to attacks from that cowboy Ronald Reagan, when he killed my adopted orphaned daughter, he was trying to kill me, instead he killed that poor innocent child.

Then I helped my brothers and sisters from Africa with money for the African Union.

I did all I could to help people understand the concept of real democracy, where people’s committee’s ran our country.

But that was never enough, as some told me, even people who had ten room houses, new suits and furniture, were never satisfied, as selfish as they were – they wanted more.

They told Americans and other visitors, that they ‘needed democracy’ and needed ‘freedom’ never realising that democracy was a cut-throat system, where the biggest dog eats the rest, but they were enchanted with those words, never realising that in America, there was no free medicine, no free hospitals, no free housing, no free education and no free food, except when people had to beg on the streets or stand in long lines to get soup.

No, no matter what I did, it was never enough for some, but for others, they knew I was the son of Gamel Abdel Nasser, the only true Arab and Muslim leader we’ve had since Salah-al-Deen, when he claimed the Suez Canal for his people, as I claimed Libya, for my people.

It was his footsteps I tried to follow, to keep my people free from colonial domination – from thieves who would steal from us.

Now, I am under attack by the biggest force in military history, my little African son, Obama wants to kill me, to take away the freedom of our country, to take away our free housing, our free medicine, our free education, our free food, and replace it with American style thievery, called ‘Capitalism’, but all of us in the Third World know what that means.

It means that corporations run the countries, run the world and its the people who will suffer.

So, there is no alternative for me, I must make my stand, and if Allah wishes, I shall die following his path, the path that has made our country rich with farmland, with good food and health, and even allowed us to help our African and Arab brothers and sisters.

I do not wish to die, but if it comes to that, to save this land, my people, all the thousands who are all my children, then so be it.

Let this testament be my voice to the world, that I stood up to crusader attacks of NATO, stood up to cruelty, stood up to betrayal, stood up to the West and it’s colonist ambitions, and that I stood with my African brothers, my true Arab and Muslim brothers, as a beacon of light.

When others were building castles, I lived in a modest house, and in my tent. I never once forgot my youth in Sirté, I did not spend our national treasury foolishly, and like Salah-al-Deen, our great Muslim leader, who rescued Jerusalem for Islam, I took little for myself….

In the West, some have called me ‘Mad Dog’ and ‘Crazy’, but they know the truth yet continue to lie, they know that our land is independent and free, not in the colonial grip, that my vision, my path, is, and has been clear and for my people and that I will fight to my last breath to keep us free, may Allah almighty help us to remain faithful and free”.

Just one small thing – but significant nonetheless, and of course depends entirely on your personal views. 

But it should be noted how goalposts always appear to be moved, or the rules changed when certain ‘acts’ are carried out by the rich, the famous and the most influential members of society…



Discredited Hampstead ‘Satanic paedophile’ activist faces trial over perverting the course of justice allegation.

WRITTEN BY Dave Burke for HAM & HIGH

A campaigner who made discredited claims of a Satanic child sex ring in Hampstead will stand trial over allegations of perverting the course of Justice.

Neelu Berry today denied one offence at Blackfriars Crown Court.

The 56-year-old has made claims about a “paedophile” cult she claimed operated from Christ Church.

The allegations were originally made by two young children, now in foster care, in a campaign derided as “evil” and “baseless” by a High Court Judge earlier this year.

Ella Draper, mother to the two children, and her partner Abraham Christie, tortured the pair into making the false allegations – which resulted in innocent people being named in online videos seen by millions.

Berry will stand trial on July 11.