All posts for the month February, 2013

I have been blown away by the support I have had on this blog, and the number of visitors it has received has shown me that I may indeed, have something valid to contribute.

In addition, I have been approached recently with an offer of payment for writing exclusively for someone else.

Although flattering, that is not what I am all about, if someone is willing to pay me, it stands to reason that they are going to charge others to read anything I have written.

I strongly believe that information should be free, you should not have to pay for something that should have always been available to anyone who wishes to access it.

I shall keep writing here, and elsewhere, for as long as I feel I have something worthwhile to contribute.

But in saying that, I also feel that things should now be stepped up a gear.

I realise that some people are not going to like what I am going to say, but that cannot be helped and I fully expect, and am ready for whatever adverse reaction my writing may bring upon myself.

The truth is important.

I believe it is a human right to be aware of the truth about the world we inhabit, however unpleasant that truth may be.

So, from here on in, I am going to be writing about the things I have hesitated in posting before now, as they may have been too ‘honest’ and truthful for some people to accept.

Some of these ‘truths’ may cause people to look inside themselves, and when that happens, they may not like what they find.

That is one of the many reasons that people tend to bury their heads in the sand, to accept what is happening to them, without a murmur, as questioning anything may reveal the thing they fear the most.

People do appear to be mortally afraid of the truth.

Because the truth is a mirror, when you look into it, you see a reflection of your true self.

Is it because you genuinely do not believe something, or is it that you do not want to admit that you have accepted and totally believed a lie for your whole lives?

The belief system for generations in this country has been what is taught in our schools, and it pours from the television and commercial radio, and is impregnated into almost all printed mediums.

You cannot escape from the propaganda, it jumps out at you from everywhere….

Eat this, drink this, wear these, be this, love this, hate this, buy this, you need this… It never stops.

The assault on your senses is overwhelming, and has been designed to capture every aspect of your life..

And it has almost worked.

There are perhaps 10 or maybe 20% of the population who can see beyond the obvious, they do not believe the mainstream media, they have no faith in the political system, they question the doctors, they eye with suspicion the so-called professional bodies that have held sway over our lives for generations…

They can see the truth….

They are the ones who should be talking, writing and spreading the truth among their friends and neighbours, they are the ones who are wide awake and are very angry.

The establishment has been waging a covert war against the British people for generations.

You still don’t think so?

When your children are going hungry, when good people are denied access to basic healthcare, are taxed almost beyond endurance, are being constantly watched, being priced out and hounded from their homes, and if unable to ‘contribute,’ people are living in fear of their Government, is that not existing in a state of war?

Are dozens of vulnerable people being driven to suicide almost daily not a cause for concern for you?

When Cabinet Ministers are sneering and spewing their bile-filled rhetoric and publicly announcing how proud they are of what they are doing.. Is that not a concern?

If it isn’t, then continue as you are, keep watching the mainstream news, keep reading the RedTop newspapers and park your arse in front of the TV to watch the ‘reality’ shows and celebrity-laden trash designed to keep you in a trance-like state of altered reality.

Do not pay any mind to anyone who does not conform to the sanitised picture of the world that has been carefully painted for you.

After All….

Who wants to swallow the bitter pill that is the truth when deception is so much easier to digest eh?

Is your entire life based upon a lie?

When you were born, your parents did what all responsible parents do. No doubt they were overjoyed at your arrival, and they knew life would be better now that you had arrived. They wanted to protect you and they wanted to make sure you would be looked after once they were gone, so they made sure your birth was registered by the local registrar.

Most likely this action was never once thought of as an obligation, but rather a necessity to set you up with the best possible chance of a safe, healthy, assured life. The state would be there to provide you with the help should you need it, the NHS would be there to care for you, and all the other benefits that would flow from the existance of your birth certificate. So off they went, and before long they would receive something looking very much like this:


This is your birth certificate – your ‘warehouse receipt’

Few people would argue with the idea that, as it is the first document to ‘officially’ exist about you, the birth certificate must be a bloody important document – the foundation of your identity. All documents which subsequently bear your name logically have to stem from the first that was created, right?


The birth certificate is in fact nothing to do with you. It is not admissiable even as evidence of your own identity. Why is this?

Well firstly it is stated quite clearly on the bottom of your own birth certificate.

Go and check for yourself.

A birth certificate is not evidence of identity. So, what is?

Secondly, as the document clearly states and is so often missed, it is copyright of the crown. The significance of these two points can be easily passed over, and obviously has been by pretty much everyone as it just seems like getting your child registered is the ‘thing to do’. As you will now see, the birth certificate is actually the gateway to the attachment of all future debts which will certainly be accrued over the life time of the registrant.

So what does this mean? Well, as the title of this article suggests, quite a lot. Every bill, every license, every account, EVERYTHING which you believed was meant for you was actually never meant for you. It can’t have been. Because if it was yours then the foundational document which carries ‘your’ name would not actively refute the fact.

What it does do is create a legal ball and chain which will be dragged throughout your life as a permanent, though voluntary, attachment of the mind.

You are not a name.

You have never been a name and you will never be a name.

However newcomers to lawful rebellion need to understand something here and seriously dwell on it for a moment. The first 18 years of your life were spent learning that your identity starts with a name. You are John Smith. You are Jane Brown. You answer to it, you see it on paper – it is you. You sign things. It’s exciting when your national insurance card arrives and you sign that. It’s exciting when your first bank account card comes with your name on it.

You sign that.

Your driving licence, your passport, your world and everything in it hinges upon your name – which is you. WRONG. None of them are yours. Now go and check all your ‘identity’ documents and realise that they are all property of someone else, and can be recalled at any time.

So what is the truth?

The ‘truth’ such as it is, is there for you to discover. Certainly the details take a long time to explain and I’m not about to do it now, but this is the reason why Lawful Rebellion will always be met with massive resistance by people who have never been disturbed from their slumber:

We have all made a massive mistake

We’ve been had on an incalculably large scale. Literally, all of society, for generations, has been duped. Worse still, the more ‘succesful’ a particular person is in life, the less willing they are to consider such a concept because after all, so what – right?

What harm has it done them?

And lo, as is the desire of all despots, tyrants and deceivers; you have created a willing slave.

A man who does not care that he is part of a deceptive, deceitful, illusory and usurious system because by the time he is introduced to the concept he no longer cares for the truth.

He only cares for himself. It is all he knows.

He may not admit it, but the root of his denial is sheer terror of the consequences should he peer beyond the veil. And that is understandable, because should you take a lingering glance at the astonishing amount of information flowing through the internet you will soon find your sanity might start to slip. Until you realise, that is, what you thought was your sanity was nothing more than a misguided mind attempting to shield you from a painful, but ultimately more truthful way of life.

No one said it would be easy, and it is going to get worse before it gets better.

This runaway cabal of zionist controlled media hypnotists are commited to their efforts of re-shaping humanity into a sub-human drone, and they’ve practically succeeded.

But ultimately they must fail, as they always have. Unfortunately this time around it’s going to be almost as painful for us as it is for them.

Not through violent discourse – that is what they hope for – but rather because this revelation will be the last time it ever happens… right?

After it was exposed that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the philanthropic brainchild of Microsoft founder Bill Gates, purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto back in 2010 valued at more than $23 million, it became clear that this so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than eradicating disease and feeding the world’s poor.

It transpired that the Gates family legacy has long been one of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine, and now agriculture.

The Gates Foundation, aka the tax-exempt Gates Family Trust, is currently in the process of spending billions of dollars in the name of humanitarianism to establish a global food monopoly dominated by genetically-modified (GM) crops and seeds.

Based on the Gates family’s history of involvement in world affairs, it appears that one of its main goals besides simply establishing corporate control of the world’s food supply is to reduce the world’s population by a significant amount in the process.

Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates Sr., has long been involved with the eugenics group ‘Planned Parenthood,’ a rebranded organisation created from the remnants of the American Eugenics Society.

In a 2003 interview, Bill Gates admitted that his father used to be the head of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders” and “human weeds” in need of culling.

Gates also admitted during the interview that his family’s involvement in reproductive issues throughout the years has been extensive, referencing his own prior adherence to the beliefs of eugenicist Thomas Robert Malthus, who believed that populations of the world need to be controlled through reproductive restrictions.

Though Gates claims he now holds a different view, it appears as though his foundation’s initiatives are just a modified Malthusian approach that much more discreetly reduces populations through vaccines and GMOs.

The Gates Foundation has invested heavily in converting Asian, and African agricultural systems to GMOs.

William Gates Sr.’s association with Planned Parenthood and continued influence in the realm of “population and reproductive health” is significant because Gates Sr. is co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

This long-time eugenicist “guides the vision and strategic direction” of the Gates Foundation, which is currently heavily focused on forcing GMOs on Africa via its financing of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA).

The Gates Foundation has admittedly given at least $264.5 million in grant commitments to AGRA, and also reportedly hired Dr. Robert Horsch, a former Monsanto executive for 25 years who developed Roundup, to head up AGRA back in 2006.

According to a report published in La Via Campesina back in 2010, 70 percent of AGRA’s grantees in Kenya work directly with Monsanto, and nearly 80 percent of the Gates Foundation funding is devoted to biotechnology.

The same report explains that the Gates Foundation pledged $880 million in April 2010 to create the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP), which is a heavy promoter of GMOs. GAFSP, of course, was responsible for providing $35 million in “aid” to earthquake-shattered Haiti to be used for implementing GMO agricultural systems and technologies.

Back in 2003, the Gates Foundation invested $25 million in “GM (genetically modified) research to develop vitamin and protein-enriched seeds for the world’s poor,” a move that many international charities and farmers groups vehemently opposed. And in 2008, the Gates Foundation awarded $26.8 million to Cornell University to research GM wheat, which is the next major food crop in the crosshairs of Monsanto’s GM food crop pipeline.

“If you control agriculture, you control the populations of the world.”

The Gates Foundation’s ties with Monsanto and corporate agriculture in general speak volumes about its real agenda, which is to create a monopolistic system of world control in every area of human life.

Vaccines, pharmaceuticals, GMOs, reproductive control, weather manipulation, global warming – these and many other points of entry are the means by which the Gates Foundation is making great strides to control the world by pretending to help improve and save it.

Rather than promote real food sovereignty and address the underlying political and economic issues that breed poverty, Gates and Co. has instead embraced the promotion of corporately-owned and controlled agriculture and medicine paradigms that will only further enslave the world’s most impoverished.

It is abundantly evident that GMOs have ravished already-impoverished people groups by destroying their native agricultural systems, as has been seen in India.

Some may say Gates’ endeavors are all about the money, while others may say they are about power and control. Perhaps it is a combination of both, where Gates is still in the business of promoting his own commercial investments, which includes buying shares in Monsanto while simultaneously investing in programs to promote Monsanto.

Whatever the case may be, there is simply no denying that Gates now has a direct interest in seeing Monsanto succeed in spreading GMOs around the world.

And since Gates is openly facilitating Monsanto’s growth into new markets through his “humanitarian” efforts, it is clear that the Gates family is in bed with Monsanto.

“Although Bill Gates might try to say that the Foundation is not linked to his business, all it proves is the opposite: most of their donations end up favoring the commercial investments of the tycoon, not really “donating” anything, but instead of paying taxes to state coffers, he invests his profits in where it is favorable to him economically, including propaganda from their supposed good intentions.”  – Silvia Ribeiro, La Jornada (2010).

“On the contrary, their ‘donations’ finance projects as destructive as geoengineering or replacement of natural community medicines for high-tech patented medicines in the poorest areas of the world … Gates is also engaged in trying to destroy rural farming worldwide, mainly through the ‘Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa’ (AGRA). It works as a Trojan horse to deprive poor African farmers of their traditional seeds, replacing them with the seeds of their companies first, finally by genetically modified (GM).”

Ethan A. Huff


Creating fake Terror, by means of mass deception is not a modern phenomenon.

The idea of ‘creating’ the enemies you need, dates back to the days of the Roman Empire in fact.

In 70 BC, an ambitious minor politician though an extremely wealthy one, Marcus Licinius Crassus, wanted to rule Rome.

Crassus was nothing if not resourceful, after all, he is credited with invention of the fire brigade.

But in his Roman version, his slaves would race to the scene of a burning building and Crassus would offer to buy it on the spot for a tiny fraction of its worth.

If the owner agreed to sell, Crassus’ slaves would put out the fire. If the owner refused, Crassus allowed the building to burn to the ground.

By using this method, Crassus came to be the largest single private land holder in Rome, and used some of his wealth to help back Julius Caesar against Cicero.

70 BC Rome was still a Republic, a system which placed very strict limits on what the Rulers could do, and more importantly were NOT allowed to do.

Crassus had no intention of allowing limits restricting his personal power, and had soon devised a plan to suit his ambition.

He used the slave revolt led by Spartacus in order to strike terror into the hearts of Rome, whose garrison Spartacus had already defeated in battle.

Spartacus had never intended marching on Rome itself, as he knew that doing so would be suicidal.

Spartacus and his followers wanted nothing from the Roman empire and had planned from the beginning of the slave revolt, merely to loot enough money from their former owners in the Italian countryside to hire a mercenary fleet in which to sail to freedom.

This was the last thing Crassus wanted Spartacus to do. He needed a convenient enemy with which to terrorize Rome itself for his personal political gain.

Crassus bribed the mercenary fleet to sail without Spartacus, then positioned two Roman legions in such a way that Spartacus had no choice but to march on Rome.

Terrified of the impending arrival of the much-feared army of gladiators, Rome declared Crassus Praetor.

Crassus then easily crushed Spartacus’ army and even though Pompey took the credit, Crassus was elected Consul of Rome the following year.

Within a short time, the Romans had surrendered their Republican form of government.

Soon would follow the first Triumvirate, consisting of Crassus, Pompeii, and Julius Caesar, followed by the reign of the god-like Emperors of Rome.

The Roman people were thus tricked into surrendering their Republic, and had no choice but to accept the brutal rule of the Emperors.

Now that the SARS-Associated Coronovirus has appeared at some hospitals in Britain, the W.H.O. are again planning to scare the living daylights out of the population, with another of it’s pre-written ‘Preparedness’ announcements.

Entirely composed to cause mass hysteria, and designed specifically around the fact that people universally believe the World Health Organisation’s totally fictitious ‘Warnings’ of an imminent Pandemic.

Remember the ‘Swine Flu?’

Based on the W.H.O’s past history, and it’s connection to the corrupt and power-hungry group of individuals who operate under the NATO umbrella, I fully expect the propaganda to start appearing very soon.

With the world in panic mode from global SARS hysteria, the carefully stockpiled anti-viral drug Ribavirin, will be ‘discovered’ to be the only cure and preventative measure from this new plague-like illness.

Despite their complete lack of effectiveness, and totally relying on the public’s lack of knowledge regarding the Pharmacological Industry, the drugs would be rolled out by the Government en masse, and eagerly swallowed by the handful.

I have therefore been considering what choice I would make if we were really facing an impending and deadly pandemic virus, such as SARS or similar?

Would it be a heavily promoted drug which has relatively low availability, extremely high costs and horrendous side effects, which in all truth would not work, or a time-tested, extremely safe, cheap and highly effective herb?

A herb like Glycyrrhizin, maybe, which is the main sweet-tasting compound found in Liquorice.

A study on glycyrrhizin’s inhibitory activity against SARS-associated coronovirus which was published in the Lancet in June of 2003, purposely received no mainstream media coverage, despite its profound importance to human health.

Why is it you think that was?

After all, Liquorice has a rich and ancient history of use as a medicine, being rooted in Indian, Chinese, Greek and Egyptian traditions.

Technically a legume, related to beans and peas, its sweetness results from the presence of glycyrrhizin, a compound 30-50 times sweeter than sugar.

This compound is what gave licorice its name, which derives from the Greek word γλυκύρριζα (glukurrhiza), meaning “sweet” (gluku) “root” (rrhiza).

But glycyrrhizin’s properties don’t end with its sweetness; it is also one of the most powerful antiviral compounds ever studied.
Glycyrrhiza glabra

Liquorice’s potent antiviral properties are not limited to SARS-associated coronaviruses, but have also been studied in connection with another epidemic/pandemic capable and potentially lethal virus, namely Influenza.

Liquorice is promoted in the mainstream as a “dangerous herb,” due to its ability to stimulate blood pressure when consumed excessively, but measured against the higher toxicity of most mainstream drugs, this is yet another lie put out by the large pharmaceutical companies.

It is important to be aware that even when the glycyrrhizin is isolated and concentrated pharmaceutically, its relative toxicity is extraordinarily low, when compared to antiviral drugs like Ribavirin.

Consider also, that glycyrrhizin is much cheaper… So very little cash can be made from it!….

I feel angry today. I heard a Radio Interview on the Victoria Derbyshire Show on Radio 5 which featured somebody I know.

This particular Lady was once a soldier, and this particular soldier had the misfortune to get on the wrong side of an Improvised Explosive Device or IED, in 2005 while on active duty in IRAQ.

I do not need or wish to go into details, but suffice to say she suffered many horrendous injuries including the added burden of completely losing her sight.

Since then she has overcome years of the almost unimaginable pain, the sudden and nightmarish plunge into total darkness, spinal damage and the loss of her right hand.

While back at home and still recovering, she has had to cope with domestic violence, a massive betrayal by the system that was designed to protect her, bullying and harassment by members of the public, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Reading her Blog and watching her daily Tweets my heart went out to her.

The way she has taught herself an entirely new set of life skills, adapted around her cruel injuries.

The way she has not given up, and the way she has even started a business creating stunning clay sculptures, in the studio she built herself after teaching herself to use her left hand.

My own sadness was mixed with an overwhelming admiration for the courage this woman has shown in the face of such almost insurmountable difficulties.

But now she faces a new challenge.

This Tory-led Coalition Government, with their uncompassionate, soulless and inhuman ‘Bedroom Tax’ may well force this unbelievably brave woman, who in no way can be described as a ‘Burden on Society,’ to now, after all she has been through, lose her home.

This is just one case among hundreds of thousands, who are having to face a stark choice, each are as important, and each are worthy of of our attention.

In attempting to raise awareness of the true picture of the way that this country is heading, I am highlighting just one of the many heartless ways that the British Political System is trying to demoralise, destabilise and ultimately destroy the weakest and the poorest in the population.

We must fight against this, as we must fight against all injustice. We can no longer sit on our hands and nod with blind acceptance and beg for every crumb that is casually tossed in our direction.

We must get angry, we must rage, and kick, and scream and fight against this heartless system that aims to bring more than three-quarters of the population to it’s knees.

If you click the link below listen to her words, and hear the choice she may now be forced to make, which without a doubt, will turn her whole world upside down.


It has long been the belief among the more conservative branches of the Christian faith that the sin of Sodom was engaging in homosexual practices.

We have been told that God was so disgusted with the sight of all those men engaging in “unnatural sexual practices” that he sent down fire and brimstone to destroy that city and the neighbouring city of Gomorrah.

It is generally accepted among the more perceptive of biblical scholars that the offence of the inhabitants of those cities was breaching the laws of hospitality anyway.

But what I do want to make clear is that the idea that homosexuality was the sin, only actually entered Christian mythology some centuries after the bible was written.

The Byzantine emperor Justinian I was the person who declared originally that the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was explicitly homosexual practice.

This he did in two novels which he wrote in Ad 558 and ad 559.

The reason why he did this was to distract people from thinking his government was to blame for earthquakes, and to put the blame on homosexuals instead.

He also wanted to enact anti-homosexual laws to be used against his political opponents in case he could not find anything else to pin on them.

Such was the power of the personality cult that surrounded the emperor in Byzantium that any utterances from his mouth, or his pen were considered to be divinely inspired.

That particular piece of propaganda came to be a basic belief throughout Christendom, and is still used as a rod to beat homosexuals to this day.

Newton and the Apple

He is known as the ‘Father’ of physics, and during the late 17th century, Issac Newton practically invented science. The discoveries we attribute to him include the laws of motion, the visible spectrum, the speed of sound, the law of cooling, and calculus.

It does make one wonder if anybody in history ever had a thought before Newton.

Probably his most famous discovery, however, is the law of gravity. The story that has always been taught, is that Newton, only a modest mathematician and professor of physics, was sitting under the shade of an apple tree one sunny day, when an apple dropped from a branch and landed on his head.

According to the story, Newton’s first instinct was to formulate the entire set of universal laws governing the motion of gravitating bodies.

A theory that was deemed so sound that it went unchallenged and unmodified for over 200 years!

In Fact:
Newton never spoke about the apple, and in fact it was a John Conduitt who first told the story some 60 years after it supposedly happened. Even then, he was decisively vague about whether Newton actually saw an apple, or whether the apple is a metaphor that he used to illustrate the idea of gravity for people less intelligent than he was.

“Whilst he was musing in a garden it came into his thought that the power of gravity (which brought an apple from the tree to the ground) was not limited to a certain distance from the earth but that this power must extend much further.”

We are taught to think that complex discoveries happen this way, with a sudden light bulb appearing over our head. Creating the illusion it could happen to any of us.

In reality, Newton spent the best part of his life formulating and perfecting his theories.

Months and years of tedious, grinding, silent, lonely work, until he had a nervous breakdown and finally died years later, insane from Mercury poisoning.

Take a walk down any High Street these days, and you will see examples of one of the few growth industries left in this country today.

Bookmakers are probably the fastest growing, and arguably the most destructive arm of the gaming industry.

Their main function is to ravenously fed of their customers, while remaining safe in the knowledge that there will always be demand for their most addictive product – The FOBT.

The FOBT, or the ‘Fixed Odds Betting Terminal’, is a touch-screen twin-screen roulette and casino gaming machine a almost always found in bookmakers shops.

They have ben described as the ‘crack cocaine of gambling’ because of the high stakes and higher speed of play – it is easily possible to bet up to £100 every twenty seconds.

Although a 2004 law has thankfully limited the number of machines that can be installed per shop to four, the 2005 Gambling Act, however, relaxed the rules on the number of shops that bookmakers could open in any given area.

In 2007, licensed betting shops no longer had to demonstrate demand before opening new premises, meaning that you now have an explosion of bookmakers in our High Streets, and usually appearing in places previously occupied by banks and building societies.

Those types of premises are selected due to the relative ease and speed their new use can be approved, and passed by council planning departments, as there is no need to submit a ‘change of use’ application. This is also why they may – as many people have noted – cluster in what are viewed to be ‘run-down’ areas, and its not really surprising when each FOBT can generate more than £900 each week, in pure profit.

But bookmakers are a business, they therefore exist to make a profit, so what, you may ask is wrong with that?

Firstly, if I was to suggest that research has shown there to be more than twice as many betting shops in areas of high unemployment, than elsewhere, would that begin to start making sense?

And, would I be wrong if I was also to suggest, that they are targeting the poorest members of society?

And what I was to say that the FOTB-driven proliferation of bookmakers in some of the most deprived areas are not creating jobs?

Would that make a difference?

In 2010, there were 8,822 betting shops, employing 57, 319 people.

Last year, with 9,128 outlets, the betting industry created just 54, 449 jobs.

Often a magnet for violence and anti-social behaviour, betting shops are an irresponsible industry, proliferating in our most deprived areas, sucking cash out of the local economy, and treating their staff with contempt, many of who are too frightened to speak out, in case they lost their jobs.

There is, no longer, the infrastructure in place to deal with the number of problem gamblers this country is going to have, especially if we see the continued rise in the number of FOBT’s.

It is also been rumoured, that there will not even be a Prevalence Survey carried out this year, as the funding has been cut, and a conservative estimate puts the current number of problem gamblers in this country, to be above 850,000.

According to the evidence, each problem gambler costs the British state around £8,000 each year, yet the industry gives over a paltry £5M, which amounts to just 0.1% of the £5 Billion in profits, to the Responsible Gambling Trust, which at the time of writing,funds just one NHS Clinic for gambling addictions in the entire country.

People have been known to wait for referral to this essential service, for eight months or more, despite the government stating: ‘common sense dictates there is a problem with FOBT’s’, and also, they will, ‘wait for the conclusion of research carried out by the Responsible Gambling Trust before it imposes any restrictions’.

However, when you realise that the chair of the Responsible Gambling Trust is also the chair of the Association of British Bookmakers, is it really such a surprise that this issue has been kicked along the road, and mostly forgotten about?

“Rochdale is home to the most deprived estate in the country, with four out of five children growing up in poverty. But such hardship did not stop residents of the Lancashire former mill town from gambling £72million on high stakes betting machines last year, chasing jackpots of up to £500. The total, the equivalent of £340 for every man, woman and child in the town, will fuel the claim that casino-style fixed odd betting terminals (FOBTs), described as the ‘crack cocaine’ of gambling, risk causing serious addiction among the poor.”

There are many conspiracy theories regarding Christopher Dorner doing the rounds on the Internet.

Some state that he’s an insider for a National Rifle Association plot, or that he is part of an Presidential plot to get Americans to give up their guns, and now a video has surfaced on Youtube which discusses the possible motives for all of this.

One actual ‘fact’ about this whole episode that is odd, is that Christopher Dorner was actually fired in 2008 and yet he waited almost five years to retaliate against the Los Angeles Police?

He has even posted a ‘manifesto’ with his “motives,” (according to the official story).

He was fired from the LAPD for filing a report concerning the conduct of another police officer (who since was promoted) for excessive force.

The LAPD claim this is not the reason he was fired, obviously.

Dorner’s manifesto said that this firing (coupled with LAPD’s racism) is the reason for his actions, and weirdly enough on February 9th the LAPD announced they would reopen the proceedings for what led to Dorner’s termination.

I suppose the ‘official’ story is yet to be written as to why they really fired him?

It has also been reported that the police shot at a vehicle from the rear, not even knowing if Dorner was inside!

Was that in fact because the LAPD need to silence him as quickly as possible?

It is highly unusual for a $1 Million reward to be offered under these circumstances, especially when a quick glimpse of the FBI’s top ten ‘Most Wanted’ shows an average amount of around $110k.

It is only the No:1 Most Wanted who merits that sort of renumeration, but Dormer did not even make the list..

It could have been simply that the LAPD wanted to protect the American public from such a dangerous fugitive, or could here have been an entirely different reason?

Christopher Dorner’s ‘Manifesto’ does appear to make the claim that the LAPD, is an inherently rascist and bullying group of public servants, and he has highlighted several problems which certainly need to be addressed.

Was this the reason he allegedly went on such a ‘murderous’ rampage?

“During the BOR, the department attempted to label me unsuccessfully as a bully. They stated that I had bullied a recruit, XXXX, in the academy when in reality and unfounded disposition from the official 1.28 formal complaint investigation found that I was the one who stood up for XXXX when other recruits sang nazi hitler youth songs about burning Jewish ghettos in WWII Germany where his father was a survivor of a concentration camp.”

How fucking dare you attempt to label me with such a nasty vile word.

I ask that all earnest journalist investigating this story ask Officer. XXXX about the incident when Officer. XXXX began singing a nazi youth song about burning jewish ghettos.

I ask that all journalist investigating this story submit request for FOIA with the LAPD to gain access to the BOR transcripts which occurred from 10/08 to 2/09. There, you will see that a video was played for the BOR members of Mr. XXXX who suffers from Schizophrenia and Dementia stating that he was kicked by a female officer.

That video evidence supports my claim that XXXX kicked him twice in the upper body and once in the face. I would like all journalist to also request copies of all reports that I had written while employed by LAPD. Whether in the academy, or during my 3 years as a police officer. There are DR#’s attached to each report (investigative report) that I have ever written so they all exist. A FOIA request will most likely be needed to access these at Parker center or at the Personnel/Records.

Judge my writin/grammar skills for yourself. The department attempted to paint me as an officer who could not write reports. Even though Sgt. XXXX a training officer who trained me stated for the BOR panel that there was nothing wrong with my report writing and that I was better than all rookie/probationer officers he has ever trained. Officer XXXX stated the same but refused to testify as he did not want to “get involved” with the BOR’s. Contact Sgt. XXXX ,(now a Captain at Lompoc PD), Sgt. XXXX, and Sgt. XXXX. All will state that my report writing was impeccable. I will tell you this, I always type my reports because I have messy handwriting/penmanship. I never had a single kickback/redlined report at Southwest division and Sgt. XXXX and Sgt. XXXX can testify to that.

I never received an UNSATISFACTORY on any day or week. The same can be said within the U.S. Naval Reserves. All commanders will state that my report writing was always clear, concise, and impeccable.

Even search my AAR (after action reports),chits, Memorandum’s, IIR’s (Intelligence Information Reports) which were written in the Navy.

All were pristine.”

A disturbing aspect of this case is the LAPD’s insatiable thirst to shoot first and ask questions later, as there now appears to be two cases of opening fire with mistaken identity:

David Perdue was on his way to sneak in some surfing before starting work on Thursday morning when police flagged him down.

They asked who he was and where he was headed, then sent him on his way.

Seconds later, Perdue’s attorney said, a Torrance police cruiser slammed into his pickup and officers opened fire; fortunately, none of the bullets struck Perdue.

“I don’t want to use the word buffoonery but it really is unbridled police lawlessness,” said Robert Sheahen, Perdue’s attorney.

These people need training and they need restraint.”

His pickup truck, the police later explained, had matched the description of the one belonging to Christopher Jordan Dorner – the ex-cop who had evaded authorities after allegedly killing three and wounding two more.

But the pickups were different makes and colors.

And David Perdue looks nothing like Dorner..

He’s several inches shorter and about a hundred pounds lighter.

More damning is the indisputable fact that Perdue was white..

We now come to where the police pursuit has ended and Christopher Dormer is holed up in a burning cabin in Big Bear.

As they surrounded the burning cabin containing former US Marine Reserve and alleged cop killer Christopher Dorner, the police had called for a worldwide Twitter blackout.

Oddly; they deleted the Tweet afterwards.

There are rumours that the police in San Bernardino County created their own timeline of events, trying at all costs to block journalists’ from accessing the scene to confirm how the real events unfolded.

Many major news outlets complied with the police’s unusual request, the ‘official’ story being that Dorner was following the coverage and watching the police operation.

The LAPD also turned off its police scanners to prevent journalists or other interested parties from listening in, The New York Times reported.

The scanner came back online, sometime later that evening.

The fire was believed to have been started by the LAPD, with them pushing Dorner back into the building in an attempt to burn him alive!

The US Marshal’s Service district chief Kurt Ellingson seemed to confirm this, when he stated on CNN that “a suspect tried to get out of the back door of the cabin, but he was pushed back inside.”

Twitter users drew attention to the allegations that police had left Dorner to burn alive inside the cabin.

“Cops started the fire and now lying about it,” tweeted user @Anon4Justice.

“Heard them on scanner one hour ago ‘Going forward with the burn’. #dorner”.

Hacking group Anonymous also weighed in, calling the police’s requests for silence “shady”.

What I find truly odd is that CNN was reporting on the case for several hours and kept repeating how they couldn’t go into the house yet because of the fire (which had been put out by that point).

That is a ridiculous thing to say, it makes no sense to me whatsoever!

And why the complete media blackout?

Also, why were there only one or two news reporters covering one of the highest trending news stories worldwide?

We are also supposed to believe that the ONLY video recorded of the entire shootout was some poor mobile phone footage.

A video which shows the true feelings of the LAPD, is an interview with one of the police after the shootout where the officer was heard to say, “What I’m thankful for is that we don’t have to sit through 25 years of appeals on death row.”

When did the police stop being supportive of the American legal and judicial system?

It’s also odd they are so blatant about it.

While we are on the subject of anomalies, why has nobody mentioned how inappropriate that comment was?

Before shooting a sheriff’s deputy and barricading himself in a remote cabin, Dorner hijacked a truck from a 61-year-old Boy Scout leader, Richard Heltebrake.

Heltebrake later said Dorner made it clear that he was safe, saying “I don’t want to hurt you.”

Dorner told Heltebrake to start walking up the road.

He stated that Police gunfire erupted “10 seconds later,” as police closed in.

Meanhwile, San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon has said that his deputies did not intentionally burn down the California mountain cabin where Dorner is believed to have died.

Los Angeles police say they will not suspend their manhunt for Dorner until they can positively identify the remains found inside the burned out cabin.

Dorner tweeted in the time leading up to his execution that he had not killed anyone so the question should be “where is the actual proof”?

There will never be any proof of him killing anyone except what the mainstream media will deign to tell you.

The latest reports to emerge have said that they haven’t identified the body to be Dorner, so why did they deliberately burn someone to death who hadn’t even been positively identified?

The ‘official’ story is riddled with inconsistencies, and for whatever reason, has been a cover up from the start.

The only thing that I can be 100% sure of, is that Ex LAPD Police Officer Christopher Jordan Dorner, after blowing the whistle on his ex-employers, was NEVER going to be allowed to remain alive….