QUESTIONS ABOUT THE Rh-NEGATIVE BLOODTYPE.
WHERE DO I COME FROM?
Are certain abilities given to Rh-negative individuals as a condition of their blood factor?
Do people with the Rh-negative bloodtype possess greater psychic abilities?
Are Rh-negative individuals more attuned to psychic awareness?
Do they posses a genetic factor seperate from this world, and that they are, in some way descended from a crossover of humans and a kind of ‘cosmic astronaut.’?
In its barest sense, when an alien life force is merged with human DNA, does it create a human with extra sensory power that can lend itself to greater psychic ability?
Are Rh-positive individuals not as ‘Tuned In’ because they are descended from rhesus monkeys that have only the positive factor and no link to the cosmic influence?
Genetics alone cannot explain the Rh-negative factor, as genes are hereditary, although some theories state that the Rh factor was a ‘mutation’ and was then passed on. That particular theory, however, has no precedent in fact. The one fact we have, is that there is no definitive proof where the negative Rh factor even originated. Of the human blood types, O is the most common. It is a universal blood type. Blood types are further broken down into two groups, negative and positive. This is known as the RH factor.
The RH factor is the Rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) blood factor. If your blood tests positive for this, you have the factor in your blood. If you test negative, you do not have this factor. The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.
When blood type is inherited from your parents, it is known that this factor element of the blood is the most consistent human or animal characteristic passed on to the offspring. There are VERY few aberrations. It rarely, if ever changes. Most people, about 85% of the world’s population, have RH-positive blood. That could and does support the widely-taught theory that humans evolved or were derived from Primates. Yet 15 % of the remainder have Rh-negative blood.(15% of Europeans are Rh Negative , but overall it is nearer 7% of the world’s population).
So does that equally support the theory that they originated elsewhere?
So if a person’s blood type is one of least mutable human characteristics, where did the Rh-negative come from?
This question has puzzled scientists for years. There is some evidence that suggests the Rh-negative blood group may have appeared about 35,000 years ago. The appearance was regional and seemed to, originally, be connected with certain groups/tribes of people. Northern Spain and Southern France is where you can find some of the highest concentration of the Rh-negative factor in the Basque people. Another original group were the Eastern/Oriental Jews. In general terms, about 40 – 45% of Europeans have the Rh-negative group. Only about 3% of African descendent and about 1% of Asian or Native American descendent has the RH-negative group.
Due to the larger European numbers, is that where it was introduced into the human genetic code?
Could this also be where the Caucasian was introduced?
Is the introduction of the Caucasian also related to the Rh-blood factor?
If the Rh-negative factor is a ‘normal’ presentation of blood, then why is there a problem when an Rh-negative mother becomes impregnated with an Rh-positive baby?
Hemolytic disease, is actually an allergic reaction, but it can cause death for the unborn child when the two different blood types are mixed during pregnancy and birth, without medical intervention. When the antigenic substances in the mother’s blood attacks the Rh-positive blood it will attempt to destroy the cells, leading to the ultimate rejection of the ‘alien’ foetus.
So why does the human body produce antigens to a different blood type?
Is the blood group of alien origin?
The only other time this occurs in nature is, as an example, when donkeys and horses are crossbred to produce mules. This is not in any way, a ‘natural act,’ because left alone in the wild, these animals would never cross breed. Only with human intervention would this ever happen.
Was there a cross breeding of two human like beings, similar but genetically different?
People with Rh-negative blood types have certain characteristics that seem to be common among the majority.
Here is a brief list of the most common.
Higher than average IQ
More sensitive vision and other senses
Lower body temperature
Higher/Lower blood pressure
Increased occurrences of psychic/intuitive abilities
Predominately blue, green, or hazel eyes
Red or reddish hair
Increased sensitivity to heat and sunlight
Alien abduction and/or other unexplained phenomena?
So what does this mean and what can be concluded from this?
The appearance of Rh-negative blood did not follow the ‘usual’ evolutionary path. In fact, evolution would seem to be ruled out as a possible cause of the anomaly. It has been proven time and again that blood is the least likely to mutate and there are no other blood mutations in nature. The introduction of the Rh-negative blood type was NOT a naturally occurring part of human evolution. This would also lend credence that the Rh-negative factor was introduced from an outside source.
Could the source be from human-like beings from another solar system?
Or are we just as alien as they are, in that we are a product of their manipulation and interference?
Could they have come here and manipulated life forms already present on earth to create modern man?
Many ancient texts, including the Christian Bible, do support this theory. Many stories in the ancient texts, especially pre-Christian texts, do tell about a race that from the ‘Heavens to the Earth Came’. And they created man in their image. Humans saw them as their ‘Gods’, living exceptionally long lives and performing ‘miracles’. Flying about in their sky ships, shooting fire from strange weapons and creating ear-shattering booms. The humans watched in awe as these gods built massive and glorious houses and created beautiful cities for themselves. From mans primitive point of view, they were gods.
So who were these ‘Gods’?
Ancient stories tell us a lot about them. They obviously had advanced technology capable of space travel. They knew about aviation, metallurgy, the universe, the cosmic progression, medicine and evidently – genetics. They knew about atomic energy and weapons and used them. Evidence of this can be found almost everywhere on Earth. (Though much is suppressed by mainstream historians and archeologists) They knew about agriculture and how to create more nutritious grains and other food staples. All of the basic grains that humans rely on for food have been determined to have all appeared at the same time spanning roughly a 10,000 year period. A very short time, geologically speaking. And no new grain has since been developed.
Our ancient texts tell us they began to take humans for their spouses. The Bible says, “the gods looked upon woman and found her pleasant to behold and took her as their wives.” They then had children, many children. But not all humans were a result of this interbreeding. The first human was a result of scientific research combining primates with the gods’ genes. The first humans were not a product of interbreeding. But small portions of humans are, and their blood type can support this.
In the first part of this article, it described what happens when two species who were physically similar but genetically different interbreed.
They produce hybrids.
Mules are the hybrid, the product of a union between a horse and a donkey. However, mules are born sterile because there is no genetic relationship between the horse and the donkey.
When humans were first created, were they a product of two genetically similar but not related species?
Were they a combination of the DNA of the primates and the gods and produced ‘artificially’ in a laboratory?
If the gods have the technology to create a new species, they would have no problem overcoming the problem of the hybrids being sterile. A little genetic manipulation and it would no longer be an issue. Three prototypes of humans were created. Each one successively more advanced. Two types by design and the last entirely by chance. Nethanderal Man is suspected of being an early humanoid created by the gods but Cro-Magnon was almost definitely a product of their intervention. The next type is whom we call pre-human and then we have modern man.
Was Modern man a result of interbreeding between the gods and pre-humans?
This interbreeding for the most part created no problems in the resulting offspring, except for a line that inherited, from their ‘other’ parents, the Rh-negative blood type. This is also supported by the fact that these humans did not inherit the protein found in the blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey. They did not inherit it because one of their parents did not have the monkey protein. This protein is present only because combining primate DNA with hybrid DNA from the gods created the original human proto-type that carried the monkey protein.
So in conclusion, is it such a leap of faith to suggest that man may be a creation of a highly technological race of human like beings that ‘From the Heavens to the Earth came?’
I could go even further and suggest that these advanced beings are among us today and are still very active in the affairs of man.
But for what reason?