Contrary to what I have read in some of the darker corners of the World Wide Web, the owner of this website has little faith in, nor has any allegiance to the mainstream media as a whole.
The MSM has a documented and long history of misleading, distracting and ignoring altogether, many issues which should be, and rightly so in the public interest – a number of which have been highlighted on this very site over the past three years.
I am under no illusions that the mainstream media, since it’s inception, has not only been the mouthpiece of the government of the day, but of the establishment as a whole, and as such, the propaganda and disinformation it churns out on an hourly basis, does almost nothing to serve the interests of those it claims to inform and represent.
That being said, it is an undeniable fact that the mainstream media, in all it’s forms, is without equal in it’s ability to shape not only public opinion on a massive scale, but can, and has, influenced how this countries population votes, how they dress, how and what they eat and drink, what they like and dislike, what and who they publicly support or universally condemn – and whether you like it or not, is still the ‘go to’ news source for millions of people daily, as it has been for generations.
And will continue to be so.
That is not likely to change any time soon, and part of the responsibility for that, has to lie with those who have claimed to offer an ‘alternative‘ to the mainstream, namely the so-called ‘Alternative Media’ and the somewhat ironically titled ‘Truth Movement’.
As is the case with the mainstream news outlets, there are of course those within the confines of the AM, who are genuinely trying to make a difference, and are struggling to compete against a virtual tsunami of misinformation, distraction, meaningless fluff and outright lies spewing from the websites, forums and social media accounts of those in the AM – who’s only purpose appears to be preventing the truth from surfacing.
I am only too aware of the failings of the mainstream media, and as such have no illusions as to the credibility of many news stories that have been implanted into the public psyche, a number of which are worth mentioning here, if only to show that the MSM have never been averse to publishing wholly inaccurate information in order to sell stories, but also to promote certain agendas on behalf of the establishment or certain individuals.
For example, it is difficult to forget what was splashed across the front page of the Sun newspaper following the horrendous Hillsborough football tragedy, where the paper alleged that Liverpool fans ‘robbed the victims and urinated on the police.’
There are many examples of the mainstream media publishing what amount to outright lies and malicious gossip with no foundation on fact, and one of the fairly recent examples, is that of the ‘door stepping’ of Brenda Leyland by Martin Brunt of SkyNews, based almost entirely on a dossier that was compiled by online supporters of Gerry and Kate McCann.
A dossier incidentally, that alleged that Ms Leyland was an online ‘troll‘ who was harassing the McCanns and their supporters.
The dossier is also believed to have been given to Brunt, (following an appeal by Gerry McCann that ‘An example must be made’) by an ex-policeman, who is now a prominent media figure who proports to represent victims of child exploitation and abuse.
There is also little doubt in many people’s minds now, that the unwarranted media exposure and the online fury that followed Brunt’s ‘exposure‘ of an innocent woman, who was only one among thousands who were merely expressing their own doubts and simply asking pertinent questions about a story that simply does not stand up – ultimately contributed to her taking her own life a short time later.
So is the mainstream media entirely to blame?
Are they exclusively responsible for the tragic event that followed that particular incident?
Or should the blame lie with those who contributed to, and presented the dossier of compiled names to the media?
A dossier without which, Brenda Leyland would not have been seen all over the media and the Internet, nor would she have been labelled an online ‘Troll‘ – and certainly would not been driven to a point where she may have possibly been left with little option but to take her own life.
I am not going to illustrate the incidences of phone hacking and other nefarious practices that the mainstream media are certainly responsible for, as enough has been written about that already, and it will serve no purpose in regard to the purpose of this article.
However, as untrustworthy and notoriously inaccurate and controlled the mainstream media undoubtably are, they are paragons of virtue when compared to some of the self-styled spokespersons and ‘investigative journalists’ that exist among the online ‘Alternative Media’ and the ‘Truth Movement’.
And it’s my own experience with some of those that I would like to focus on now, as to my knowledge, the mainstream media may be many things, but even the most unscrupulous and dishonest of mainstream journalists, have never resorted to the tactics of some of those I am going to highlight here.
The Outlaw attracts on average, around fifty comments a day. A number of those are genuine, some are simple spam and the remainder are mainly extremely offensive, abusive, threatening and almost always accusatory, towards both me and some of those who comment legitimately here.
The greater majority I would never allow to have a platform here, although they are archived in a safe place where I can access them if needed.
I will only focus on the comments posted here and elsewhere that directly address me or are about me, as they all emanate from the same small group of people, who are all connected in some capacity, to the online attacks of those who have spoken out about their experience of Childhood Sexual Abuse.
“Today I have uncovered proof that Jimmy (The Outlaw) Jones, is a real counter intelligence operative. The only one out of all ever accused, that can actually be proven. I’ve uncovered this via a very silly stunt pulled by his henchman. Thanks JJ, KFM & Cahill. I knew something good would come of this”
That comment was posted to the Facebook page of an anonymous entity calling him/herself ‘Fabooka Da Stait’, who is a ‘moderator‘ on the Facebook page and website owned and published by Christopher D. Spivey, who, if one was to look at his website, will see my name mentioned or myself being referred to on almost every article and many of the associated comments – for reasons known only to themselves.
The comment was originally posted by a Danielle Lá Verité George, who has also claimed among other things, that she is descended from an ‘Elite Banking’ bloodline, is an Albino, has a Genius Level IQ and has published the most outlandish allegations one could imagine on her Facebook page, (where she also describes herself as a ‘Public Figure’) as well as her YouTube channel.
What La Verité has consistently failed to provide among the many allegations about the large number of people she has made, however, is any actual evidence or proof of anything she says. I will therefore use this opportunity to invite La Verité to supply whatever evidence she has to back up any of her allegations about me – including the one I have published here.
On October 29th, 2014 I called out Chris Spivey and gave him ample opportunity to provide evidence of any of the lies he has published about me, but as he has so far failed to provide anything other than publishing more lies and false allegations, I remain confident that La Verité will be equally reluctant to back up any of her many crackpot claims about me either.
I apologise beforehand for the content of the following set of comments, but I have decided to publish them here to give the reader a small insight into the mindset of people who operate within the AM, and with whom I deal with on a daily basis on this site.
The comment above is directed at a regular commentator on this site, and is quite vile in itself, but also note the allegation that I apparently ‘stalk kids on Facebook’, which of course there is absolutely no evidence of whatsoever.
Again, the same manner of vile content, and repeating the allegation that I am an ‘abuser of women and children online’, plus the added veiled threat that what was coming was going to ‘come out, in a neighbourhood near you. Soon!!!’
I did wonder why these people would continually make accusations that I was an ‘Abuser of women online’, and you would have to trawl back a few months to January 2015, (Thanks Jane) to find the comment which was posted on Chris Spivey’s site to provide the answer.
The commentator ‘JS2’ is a very familiar name online, mainly on Twitter, where she obsessively Tweets about Childhood Sexual Abuse and attacks various UK politicians, and is a fanatical supporter of Mark Williams-Thomas.
She regularly can be seen posting upwards of 250 tweets per day. JS2 is known to many people online as Janette Scharenborg, who lives on a farm in Beltrum, Holland.
Ms Meachen/Scharenborg has a long and documented history of online stalking, compulsive lying, abusive behaviour and has targeted many people including the Journalist Sonia Poulton, who wrote about her own experiences with Scharenborg here.
The response which comes from ‘Dogman‘, makes a reference to ‘our friend Jimmy’ which leaves the regular patrons of that site in no doubt as to who he is referring, but what is interesting, is that both Scharenborg and ‘Dogman‘ both make references to a ‘Ryan Tanner’.
Apart from the ridiculous allegation that ‘Ryan Tanner’ is Sonia Poulton’s boyfriend, what both these people fail to disclose is that they are both more than aware that ‘Ryan Tanner’ was the pseudonym given to Darren Laverty who had been previously mentioned on many pages of ‘The Secret Of Bryn Estyn‘ by Richard Webster; which is the definitive account of alleged incidences of child abuse that was said to have occurred at the Bryn Estyn Children’s Home in Wrexham, North Wales.
Incidentally, Darren Laverty is also a regular contributor on Chris Spivey’s website and Facebook page.
The ‘Monkey‘ he refers to is in fact myself, and he appears to be another one who apparently cannot tell the truth about his actions.
The allegation he refers to was that he had stolen a photograph only, which only came to my attention after he posted it online in one of his many ranting YouTube video’s, after visiting my home. His allegation that ‘a chance encounter where he had asked me to “dance” is also a complete fabrication, as he had been spotted a number of times that day in Llandudno, as he appeared to be following us.
The ‘Dance‘ he alleges he asked for, was in reality a physical threat ‘to fight me’ in the street, which he made in front of my children, one of whom was five years old at the time, which had to be reported to the police, because for the previous two years, he had been stalking my family, had taken photographs while sitting outside our house, posted innumerable threats online, and had also got me arrested on a completely false allegation, which at the time of the incident he referred to, I was still on police bail, and I would be re-arrested if I had any contact with him.
He posted an ominous Tweet on the day his 12-month conditional discharge expired, which shows that I have not heard the last from Laverty by any means.
The next comment was posted by the delightfully-named ‘Fuck the State’ who along with the aforementioned ‘Dogman‘ is also a moderator on Chris Spivey’s website. Many people are of the mind that ‘Fuck The State‘, ‘Fabooka Da Stait’ and Chris Spivey are in fact the same person, as the language they use is strikingly similar, and they appear online at separate times.
The threats here are turning somewhat darker, inasmuch as his claim that he is ‘going to fuck me when he catches me’, which I have been informed is a clear threat of male rape.
He also makes references to other commentators on this site, who he alleges would not be able to ‘protect me’ as if that was even necessary.
He/she (as I am not completely certain) does appear to have a number of online identities, which has been admitted to here, there may be more, but I have not really looked that hard, but as everybody leaves a digital trail online, it may not be that difficult a task.
The latest comment, posted yesterday is particularly disturbing, as it not only reiterates the earlier rape threat, but adds something even more sinister and unsavoury, and the people who I have showed the comment to before publishing it here, have expressed alarm at it’s threatening content, which under no circumstances should be ignored.
I shall leave that for the reader to decide.
It has also become obvious, that every one of the people referred to in this article, appear to be connected by at least two things, the first being that they all congregate around the Facebook page and website of Chris Spivey, and the second is that they all appear to be obsessed with all aspects of historical and current childhood abuse.
The common denominator does seem to be that any of these people can be found all over the Internet, issuing various threats and making any number of false allegations, about anyone who even so much as mentions Chris Spivey in anything other than a complimentary or deferential manner.
I have been sent links to a number of websites, forums and social media accounts where ‘Spivey’s Bully Boys’ (and girls) have been posting overtly vile, very intimidating and overly threatening and violent comments, and Chris Spivey himself is due to appear at Chelmsford Magistrates Court on the 6th of August for online harassment.
And as the image that was sent to me earlier this evening shows, his Facebook account has also been reported for harassing other users in a similar manner.
I have many questions as to why these people are so desperately trying to defend a man, who is clearly a nasty piece of work, a compulsive liar, a bully and a fantasist who thinks nothing of harassing and ridiculing innocent people, as well as regularly making spurious allegations about anyone and everyone he chooses to target.
He has even recently accused the Essex Police of being ‘Sexually frustrated deviants’ which is a really strange thing to allege about somebody else, when that allegation is made by someone who has photographed and filmed himself wearing a number of somewhat ‘unusual‘ outfits himself on numerous occasions.
Taking what I have published above into consideration, would it come as a complete surprise to hear that despite the obvious failings and duplicitous behaviour of the Mainstream Media, I would take them over the Alternative Media without a moments hesitation, which saddens me to say, but based on my experiences of some of those within the AM, it really is no contest.
There will undoubtably be some readers, who will think that my reasoning is flawed, and that the mainstream media should not be trusted under any circumstances, however, one only has to look at the response to the coverage given to the establishment paedophilia allegations, which SkyNews, Exaro News, a number of mainstream newspapers and of course the Australian 60 MINUTES programme, have aired, to see it’s ability to reach an audience the AM can only dream about.
So why is it so difficult to accept that there are times, when it is better to work with something that has the capacity of doing the very thing that the Alternative Media claims to want above all else – which is to get the truth out there?
There are a small number who work within the AM who are entirely trustworthy and are doing it for the right reasons, which is to get the truth the truth out without fear or favour, and it’s those people that the Outlaw has built up a strong working relationship with over many months – Eddie Boyce and Deborah Williams of the KENT FREEDOM MOVEMENT are among that small group of ‘outsiders’ who have been virtually besieged by dark entities who’s sole purpose is to prevent the truth being told.
Although I am assured that the genuine people prefer the term ‘Reality Analysts’ than Alternative Media or Truther.
I will not elaborate any further on that at this time, but what I will say is that the truth will out when the time is right, and there are some very well-known names involved, who will I am sure be very familiar to the regular readers of this site and indeed to the wider world.
The Outlaw is also in regular contact with a number of people, a number of whom work within the mainstream as well as the alternative media, where a degree of trust has been built up over the last three years, which is based on consistency, mutual respect and although it seems to be in short supply these days – honesty.
There are a number of others who should get a mention here, who have also seen through the garbage peddled by the Mainstream and many Alternative Media sites, and have not only supported both myself and this site, and have been subjected to totally unnecessary levels of online abuse for doing so.
These include Jane Russell, Grouchy Marxist, Bandini, Tom Cahill, Steve Keys, the aforementioned Eddie Boyce and Deborah Williams of the KFM and a number of others who wish to remain anonymous for their own safety.
These people are also my friends, and have done nothing to deserve the abuse and the allegations levelled at them, other than to publicly support both myself and this site.
This site has also built up a strong relationship with a number of genuine CSA survivors, a number of whom have been treated appallingly by both the mainstream media and some who ‘work’ with the alternative scene and claim to represent survivors.
Among that number are men and women who were in the care system in North and South Wales, Islington, the North East, Suffolk, Surrey, the Midlands, Scotland, Northern Ireland, the North West as well as various institutions, including Medmonsley Detention Centre, Ty Mawr School, Glamorgan Farm School, Bryn Estyn, Bryn Alyn, Bersham Hall, Clwyd Hall, Crockton Hall, Usk Borstal, Eastwood Park Detention Centre and others.
They have told their stories to the Outlaw without coercion or prompting, and have also expressed a desire to identify not only their abusers, but also those within the Alternative Media who they approached in good faith to help them tell their story, and who have subsequently lied to them, obtained various amounts of money from them, published totally inaccurate information and felt that they have been treated as badly, if not worse by the very people who have publicly claimed to represent them.
Due to legal restrictions, nothing will be published on the Outlaw in regard to this at the present time, but it has all been collated and safely stored until the time is right to share with the wider world, strictly on the survivors terms, who also have total control over everything that this site decides to publish on their behalf.
Their stories, their words, their choice and their right.
NOTE: I will be exploring in some depth the reasons behind some of the online attacks on CSA survivors, looking at the political and mainstream media connections behind a number of these attacks, and will also explain why only certain CSA survivors are targeted, while a number of ‘fake’ survivors are so heavily promoted by the media. I will also be identifying a number of those who are ultimately culpable in a forthcoming article later this year.