It has been suspected for a number of months, that many of those who are prominent in the Alternative Media and the Truth Movement, especially those who have suddenly 'appeared from nowhere' – are in some way connected to each other.
Questions have also been asked, not only about how many of these 'Truthers' appear to be connected, but why they are also spreading completely bogus and positively harmful stories via their websites and social media accounts.
The still ongoing Hampstead 'Satanic Abuse' story being the most obvious recent example, but there have been others, also featuring alleged instances of Child Abuse incidentally, like the Hollie Greig Hoax and the Elm Guest House 'list' that went viral after appearing on many Alternative Media websites and 'Trending' on social media.
Looking at these events, one could be forgiven for thinking that there may be another reason why these stories manage to gain so much traction, and attract so much online attention, when a few minutes research will soon reveal that all of these stories – have no basis in fact whatsoever.
So what reason could there be for so many allegedly intelligent, open-minded and self appointed 'radical thinkers', to propagate and heavily endorse such obviously fake stories?
Could there be a financial incentive?
Could there even be a group operating within the Alternative Media, who are part of a syndicate, (for want of a better word) which generates cash by creating traffic to each other's websites by placing specific links into their articles, on a sidebar, or even within the comments section of each website?
“The most frequently used type of moneymaking widgets are the ones that display ads. These come in two types: pay-per-click and pay-per-impression. Pay-per-click ads pay out each time a visitor clicks on a link. These can be more profitable, if you can generate the clicks. Pay-per-impression pays less for each instance, but every visitor to your site will generate an instance. A good example of a pay-to-click option is Google ADSENSE.”
Would the following comment I pulled from the David Icke Forums make things any clearer?
Could this comment posted to the above mentioned 'Crimes of Empire' site from 'A and E' have been written by Abraham Christie and Ella Draper, who are without a doubt, key to the whole Hampstead story?
What about this comment from of one of the original architects of the Hampstead Satanic Panic, Sabine McNeill on the Tap Newswire?
“BTW how large is the number of hits/visitors you're getting? Don't you want to put that Widget out and be all proud together?”
Has Sabine suddenly forgotten all about the fact that not only two very young children, but dozens of innocent people in Hampstead have been publicly vilified and also placed in very real danger by her actions?
Was the whole thing all about the amount of hits that can be generated on syndicated websites?
Could it be a case of attempting to generate cash by any means necessary?
Or is it something else entirely?
Regular readers of the Outlaw, should be aware by now that there has been a very pronounced 'Split' within the rank and file of what has come to be known as the 'Alternative' Media.
As was predicted some months ago, not only on this site but also a small number of others, some of the more prominent mouthpieces within the AM, have not only been attacking anyone and everyone who has voiced even the smallest criticism of them – but have also been responsible for spreading what appear to be increasingly bizarre and wholly unbelievable stories.
Which in turn, has had the effect of creating division, confusion and acute mistrust among an increasing number of people online, who through necessity, rely on the AM to narrate, without fear or favour, the truth about what is really happening in the world.
It is difficult to predict with accuracy the reasons for this, or indeed the ultimate objective, but whether this situation has arisen through accident or design, only time will tell.
So with that in mind, the Outlaw has compiled the following in an attempt to redress the balance:
- Always try to adopt a positive attitude, and see it as your personal responsibility to take any opportunity to be as proactive as you can elsewhere, instead of being a spectator of any online dramas.
- Try to arm yourself with pertinent information from as many sources as possible, as to what or who is the root cause of this chaos. Ask yourself also, who it is you believe will benefit from it?
- Try not to unnecessarily waste energy looking for all the answers at once, nor rely entirely on self-appointed online 'experts' in the Alternative Media.
However credible they may appear at first.
- You have the capacity and the means to seek out the truth for yourselves, and from as many sources as you think are necessary.
- Try to stay as detached as you can, and remain calm, level-headed and approach things from a place of rightful indignation as opposed to anger, jealousy and revenge.
- All your actions and interactions with others, should come from a position of educating not only yourselves, but also attempting to help others for the greater good of all concerned.
- Be alert to the many traps that emanate from within some corners of the Alternative Media and the truth movement.
- Remain vigilant to the reality that there are inordinately high levels of infiltrators, paid operatives, shillabers and trolls who are propagating both disinformation and half truths in order to distract and muddy the waters.
- Be especially wary of movements that spring from within the truth movement, as although most people who rightfully protest are of course genuine, their enthusiasm, energy and ideas are being harvested, contained, controlled and ultimately suppressed.
Like fish caught inside a large net.
- Everybody needs to share equal responsibility for being in the position we now find ourselves in. Most people have been kept occupied by endless mainstream media distractions, increasing numbers of ludicrous Alternative Media stories and constant infighting online – while remaining oblivious to a very obvious dark force which has burrowed into your lives.
- Constantly remind yourself that every experience you have had in your lives thus far, no matter how seemingly trivial or mundane they may seem, have provided you with the necessary skills and experience to deal with not only what is happening now, but what is needed in the future.
- Keep reminding yourselves that to bring about any real change, one needs qualities such as tenacity, hardiness, integrity, common sense and of course, life experience.
The majority of you possess all of these and more, even if you doubt yourself at times.
You must realise, and embrace your true potential.
Be assured that if you believe in your own abilities, learn to recognise and trust your instincts – and are able to see through the endless layers of bullshit, then the truth will eventually out….
It always does….
“All men make mistakes, but a good man yields when he knows his course is wrong, and repairs the evil. The only real crime is excessive Pride.”
The Outlaw has been on a quest this week, trying to get to the bottom of a mysterious event that occurred within this very site.
During the evening of the 15th of February, a number of articles and their associated comments were suddenly deleted, the reasons for which, have denied any attempt at a definitive explanation.
I am still at a loss as to how this site was able to be accessed, but as a result, the security has now been upgraded which will, I am assured – prevent a similar event happening again.
There were two articles deleted, one of which, ‘NO PRIDE’ was able to be saved from a backup and republished, but the other, ‘STERCUS LIBER’ which incidentally had something over 170 comments accompanying it, was not able to be retrieved as it was also deleted from the Google Cache.
The article, contained the usernames of a number of anonymous net users, who I had personal experience of them not being who they claimed they were.
The article had been on the Outlaw for more than a year previously, and only started attracting attention during November 2014, when more than one hundred and fifty comments were posted during a 24-hour period.
One of those commentators, ‘Thomas Pride’, who writes a satirical blog which concentrates mainly on ridiculing mainstream media Journalists and figures on the right of the political arena, made an initial comment where he claimed he felt ‘hurt’ as his name was not further up the list of names I had published.
In response, I moved his name closer to the top, but Pride continued posting an inordinate number of decidedly odd comments, which then attracted other comments from readers, one of whom revealed ‘Tom Pride’ as being a Julian Gilbert, who is currently living in Gdynia, Poland.
This had a strange effect on Pride, as he then appeared to descend into a state of complete panic, and began making the most bizarre allegations, one of which, was the claim that readers of this site were ‘trolling a victim of Jimmy Savile’.
Pride continually denied that he was Julian Gilbert, even though he had initially indicated where Gilbert’s’ Facebook account could be located, and he also stubbornly refused to acknowledge the evidence that he had himself, although inadvertently, indicated where his own identity could be revealed.
Ordinarily the Outlaw tries not to publish a large number of images, but in this instance it will make things much clearer and keep the word count down to a manageable level.
This is where Pride makes the initial allegation about Julian Gilbert being a 13-year old victim of Jimmy Savile, and also denies that it is in fact him, who is Julian Gilbert.
This is what you will see if you care to access the WIKIPEDIA entry for the group‘Bourbonese Qualk’.
This is the entry before it was edited, which clearly stated: ‘Gilbert concentrated on writing political satire under the pseudonym Thomas Pride.’
These are the page revision differences, which show along the top that it was edited from the IP location 22.214.171.124 and beneath that it gives the editors web address as *[http://tompride.wordpress.com/Gilbert’s Blog].
This shows exactly what was edited from the entry.
This is the location that is listed for that IP Address.
And this is Julian Gilbert’s Twitter profile which shows his location as ‘Gdynia, Poland’.
As I mentioned earlier, I have not been able to retrieve the complete article that was deleted, so I cannot state exactly how many times Tom Pride/Julian Gilbert commented – but what I was able to do, was access the Outlaw’s administrator log which shows 39 site visits from Poland that day, where ordinarily it gets no more than one or two at the most.
As Prides earlier comment stated that the readers of this site were in fact ‘trolling one of Jimmy Savile’s victims’, namely Julian Gilbert, why would Gilbert not have acknowledged this when he posted this message on his Facebook page the day after Savile died?
Even taking all of the above into account, I will not accuse Tom Pride/Julian Gilbert of being responsible for ‘Hacking’ the Outlaw to delete the posts I have discussed here, as I have no definitive proof of that.
What I can do however, is to highlight and present the evidence of his bizarre behaviour that day and his coincidental editing of a WIKIPEDIA page later that same day, that also happened to reveal his real identity.
I will also add that I do not believe for one minute the Outlaw is seen as any visible threat to British national security, so will not have attracted the attention of the security services, and nobody else who’s username was published in the deleted article has either commented here or contacted the Outlaw to complain, apart from Thomas Pride/Julian Gilbert.
Neither does it answer the questions as to why anyone would behave in such a bizarre manner, altering WIKIPEDIA pages in an attempt to hide his identity, and also making allegations of abuse by Jimmy Savile on a 13-year old child who appeared on his show in 1976.
In all probably, I may never get to the bottom of who was really responsible for nefariously entering this site and deleting the articles mentioned, so I can only speculate at best, and present what information I have been able to obtain for the reader to decide.
There are certain guidelines the Outlaw adheres to, in order to ensure that the articles, and comments published – create an atmosphere of safe, open, intelligent, grown-up and respectful debate for the community that this site attempts to serve.
Regular reader contributions and feedback are vitally important, and participation is encouraged – so please do your bit to ensure that this will remain possible.
The Outlaw has a responsibility to it’s readership and will always ensure that all threats, unwarranted attacks, personal insults, and spurious accusations aimed specifically at other commentators or innocent people – will be deleted immediately.
Feel free to be as animated and/or sweary as you like in discussing the articles published, or the comments of other readers, but deliberate attempts to disrupt or derail any discussion, or ridicule other commentators, will also be deleted.
Always try to reinforce any claims made with searchable facts, or at least present them with a reasoned or balanced argument which will encourage further discussion.
Do not attempt to present unsubstantiated, or imaginary claims, or statistics gleaned from anonymous ‘Alternative Media’ websites, or baseless rumours circulating on social networks like Twitter, YouTube or Facebook.
These will not pass moderation either.
If any claim or accusation made are entirely without basis, and bear little resemblance to actual facts and events, then please don’t include it in a comment, as it saves both my time and also, your credibility.
The Outlaw cannot possibly check the validity of every claim and every link that commenters post, but is ultimately responsible for the overall content – so reserves the right to not implicate itself in anything that it believes may not be strictly accurate.
The recent ‘Buckingham Palace Naked Escapee’, and the ‘Hampstead Satanic Abuse’ allegations being only two recent examples of such claims – that appear to have been taken at face value and spread like wildfire by thousands of Internet users.
Which incidentally, included a number of very well known Alternative Media sites with considerably larger readerships than the Outlaw currently enjoys.
Finally, if anyone still continues to venture beyond the guidelines outlined above, then please do not expect and demand to see your comments here.
THIRTY YEARS ON….
A video is being shared on Social Media and published on various ‘Alternative Media’ websites over the last few days, that claims to show a naked male, wearing one sock, abseiling from an upper window of Buckingham Palace before appearing to fall and subsequently disappear from view.
Will the images below help at all?
Even if you choose to ignore the extra pillars between the windows in the video, and the fact that the actual windows on the upper level of Buckingham Palace are different – the chances of this being anything other than a complete hoax are incalculately small.